World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 44 5189 161 154 5087

Daria N. Love publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daria N. Love between 1971 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daria N. Love published across 49 years, from 1971 to 2019, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 1999. 1 of the 173 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 1999. 1971: 1 publication 1972: 3 publications 1973: 3 publications 1974: 4 publications 1975: 4 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 6 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 7 publications 1980: 7 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 18 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication
1971 2019

173 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daria N. Love: publications per year, 1971 to 2019
Year Publications
1971 1
1972 3
1973 3
1974 4
1975 4
1976 1
1977 6
1978 1
1979 7
1980 7
1981 4
1982 3
1983 5
1984 4
1985 2
1986 3
1987 3
1988 2
1989 2
1990 4
1991 5
1992 6
1993 5
1994 10
1995 8
1996 6
1997 4
1998 9
1999 18
2000 12
2001 5
2002 4
2003 3
2004 1
2005 1
2006 2
2007 0
2008 1
2009 0
2010 2
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 1
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 1
Total 173
Download as CSV

Daria N. Love publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daria N. Love sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 145–154 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 154 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265 154
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Daria N. Love D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daria N. Love sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122 44
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Daria N. Love was affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia during their academic career. Their work contributed to the scientific community, although specific details about their recent research papers, including titles and publication venues, are not recorded in the available data.

Their collaborative network and frequent co-authors are also not documented in the accessible records. There is no listed information about recurring venues where they published or specific book publications attributed to them.

The scientist's research fields, subfields, and main topics of study are not detailed, limiting insight into their precise areas of focus within academia. Similarly, there is no data regarding awards or honors received throughout their career.

The lack of detailed publication, collaboration, and topic data restricts a comprehensive understanding of Daria N. Love's scientific contributions and impacts. However, the affiliation with a major institution such as the University of Sydney suggests engagement with advanced research environments.

Best Publications

  • Cryptococcosis in cats: clinical and mycological assessment of 29 cases and evaluation of treatment using orally administered fluconazole

    R. Malik;D.I. Wigney;D.B. Muir;D.J. Gregory

  • Epidemiology of EHV-1 and EHV-4 in the mare and foal populations on a Hunter Valley stud farm: are mares the source of EHV-1 for unweaned foals

    J.R Gilkerson;J.M Whalley;H.E Drummer;M.J Studdert

  • Epidemiological studies of equine herpesvirus 1 (EHV-1) in Thoroughbred foals: a review of studies conducted in the Hunter Valley of New South Wales between 1995 and 1997

    J.R Gilkerson;J.M Whalley;H.E Drummer;M.J Studdert

  • Cryptococcosis in dogs: a retrospective study of 20 consecutive cases.

    R. Malik;E. Dill-Macky;P. Martin;D.I. Wigney

  • Prevalences of feline leukaemia virus and feline immunodeficiency virus infections in cats in Sydney

    R Malik;K Kendall;J Cridland;S Coulston

  • Asymptomatic carriage of Cryptococcus neoformans in the nasal cavity of dogs and cats

    R. Malik;D.I. Wigney;D.B. Muir;D.N. Love

  • Combination chemotherapy of canine and feline cryptococcosis using subcutaneously administered amphotericin B

    R Malik;A J Craig;D I Wigney;P Martin

  • Infection of the subcutis and skin of cats with rapidly growing mycobacteria: a review of microbiological and clinical findings.

    R. Malik;D. I. Wigney;D. Dawson;P. Martin

  • The obligate and facultatively anaerobic bacterial flora of the normal feline gingival margin.

    Daria N. Love;Roman Vekselstein;Susan Collings

  • A latex cryptococcal antigen agglutination test for diagnosis and monitoring of therapy for cryptococcosis.

    R Malik;R McPetrie;D I Wigney;A J Craig

  • Feline immunodeficiency virus status of Australian cats with lymphosarcoma.

    L J Gabor;D N Love;R Malik;P J Canfield

  • Rapid, single-step differentiation of equid herpesviruses 1 and 4 from clinical material using the polymerase chain reaction and virus-specific primers

    G.L. Lawrence;J. Gilkerson;D.N. Love;M. Sabine

  • Oral associated bacterial infection in horses: studies on the normal anaerobic flora from the pharyngeal tonsillar surface and its association with lower respiratory tract and paraoral infections.

    G.D. Bailey;Daria N. Love

  • Detection of EHV-1 and EHV-4 DNA in unweaned Thoroughbred foals from vaccinated mares on a large stud farm.

    C. E. Foote;D. N. Love;J. R. Gilkerson;J. M. Whalley

  • Proliferative haemorrhagic enteropathy in pigs.

    R J Love;D N Love;M J Edwards

  • Inflammation and increased numbers of bacteria in the lower respiratory tract of horses within 6 to 12 hours of confinement with the head elevated

    Sharanne L. Raidal;Daria N. Love;Gd Bailey

  • Disseminated Mycobacterium genavense infection in a FIV-positive cat

    M S Hughes;N W Ball;D N Love;P J Canfield

  • Mycobacterium genavense infection in two aged ferrets with conjunctival lesions.

    A. Lucas;H. Furber;G. James;Hughes

  • Characterization of coagulase-positive Staphylococcus intermedius and Staphylococcus aureus isolated from veterinary clinical specimens.

    J Raus;D N Love

  • Bacteroides species from the oral cavity and oral-associated diseases of cats

    D.N. Love;J.L. Johnson;L.V.H. Moore

  • Identification by 16S rRNA gene analyses of a potential novel mycobacterial species as an etiological agent of canine leproid granuloma syndrome.

    M. S. Hughes;G. James;N. Ball;M. Scally

  • Virus envelope markers in mammalian tropism of avian RNA tumor viruses.

    D Boettiger;D N Love;R A Weiss

  • Description of Porphyromonas circumdentaria sp. nov. and reassignment of Bacteroides salivosus (Love, Johnson, Jones, and Calverley 1987) as Porphyromonas (Shah and Collins 1988) salivosa comb. nov.

    Daria N. Love;G. D. Bailey;Susan Collings;D. A. Briscoe

  • Genetic structure of populations of β-haemolytic Lancefield group C streptococci from horses and their association with disease

    L.R. Jorm;D.N. Love;G.D. Bailey;G.M. McKay

Frequent Co-Authors

James R. Gilkerson
James R. Gilkerson University of Melbourne
Richard Malik
Richard Malik University of Sydney
R. J. Rose
R. J. Rose University of Sydney
Hannele Jousimies-Somer
Hannele Jousimies-Somer Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare
Gregory J. Seymour
Gregory J. Seymour University of Queensland
Michael J. Studdert
Michael J. Studdert University of Melbourne
Heidi E. Drummer
Heidi E. Drummer Burnet Institute
Linda L. Blackall
Linda L. Blackall University of Melbourne
Wieland Meyer
Wieland Meyer Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute
Vivek Kapur
Vivek Kapur Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in microbiology, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Many online programs offer flexible paths in medical fields, and understanding which medical degrees online that pay well can help align education with financial goals.

If public health interests you, consider pursuing an online Master of Public Health (MPH) degree. Some of the online public health masters programs easy to get into provide accessible pathways for professionals looking to advance their knowledge with minimal barriers.

Additionally, careers such as a child life specialist can be pursued with a bachelor’s degree, offering meaningful work with competitive pay. Learn more about a child life specialist salary with bachelor degree and the steps to enter this field.

For those facing unique challenges, including individuals with criminal records, understanding what can a felon go to college for is crucial. Many online degrees offer second chances, making education and career advancement accessible to a wider audience.

Best Scientists Citing Daria N. Love

Recently Published Articles