World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stephen B. Fawcett

Stephen B. Fawcett

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
37
Citations
8671
World Ranking
6139
National Ranking
2938

Stephen B. Fawcett publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen B. Fawcett sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 157 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Stephen B. Fawcett D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen B. Fawcett sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen B. Fawcett is affiliated with the University of Kansas in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on health professions, with significant work in general health professions, modeling and simulation, infectious diseases, clinical psychology, and health more broadly.

Their recent publications highlight several key areas of study, including community health, health policy implementation, and infectious diseases. Notable papers authored by or involving Stephen B. Fawcett include:

  • A Reflection on Community Research and Action as an Evolving Practice, 2021, published in Behavior and Social Issues
  • Behavioral Interventions Contributing to Reducing Poverty and Inequities, 2022, Behavior and Social Issues
  • Kenya's Experience: Factors Enabling and Impeding the COVID-19 Response, 2023, Health Promotion Practice
  • Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation of the COVID-19 Response in a Local Public Health System, 2021, Health Promotion Practice
  • Strengthening Collaborative Action for Community Health and Development, 2020, American journal of health studies

Their work spans a variety of topics, such as:

  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Viral infections and outbreaks research
  • Community health and development
  • Health policy implementation science
  • COVID-19 and mental health
  • Vaccine coverage and hesitancy
  • Evaluation and performance assessment

Stephen B. Fawcett frequently publishes in venues like Health Promotion Practice, Behavior and Social Issues, American journal of health studies, and Preventing Chronic Disease. The most common publication venues for their work are:

  • Health Promotion Practice
  • Behavior and Social Issues
  • American journal of health studies
  • Preventing Chronic Disease

Coauthorship collaborations are part of their research activities, with repeated partnerships involving:

  • Peter Malekele Phori
  • Noemie Nikiema Nidjergou
  • Jemimah Mwakisha
  • Cleph Silouakadila
  • Christina Holt

Overall, Stephen B. Fawcett's research contributes to advancing knowledge in community health and infectious disease dynamics, with emphasis on evaluating and improving health system responses during the COVID-19 pandemic and broader infectious outbreaks.

Best Publications

  • A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health

    Stergios Tsai Roussos;Stephen B. Fawcett

  • Identifying and Defining the Dimensions of Community Capacity to Provide a Basis for Measurement

    Robert M. Goodman;Marjorie A. Speers;Kenneth Mcleroy;Stephen Fawcett

  • Using empowerment theory in collaborative partnerships for community health and development

    Stephen B. Fawcett;Adrienne Paine-Andrews;Vincent T. Francisco;Jerry A. Schultz

  • A contextual-behavioral model of empowerment: Case studies involving people with physical disabilities

    Stephen B. Fawcett;Glen W. White;Fabricio E. Balcazar;Yolanda Suarez-Balcazar

  • SOME VALUES GUIDING COMMUNITY RESEARCH AND ACTION

    Stephen B. Fawcett

  • Evaluating Community Coalitions for Prevention of Substance Abuse: The Case of Project Freedom

    Stephen B. Fawcett;Rhonda K. Lewis;Adrienne Paine-Andrews;Vincent T. Francisco

  • A methodology for monitoring and evaluating community health coalitions

    Vincent T. Francisco;Adrienne L. Paine;Stephen B. Fawcett

  • Social validity: a note on methodology.

    Stephen B. Fawcett

  • Rapid Assessment Procedures: A Review and Critique

    Karij Harris;Norge Jerome;Stephen Fawcett

  • Peer Reviewed: Building Multisectoral Partnerships for Population Health and Health Equity

    Stephen Fawcett;Jerry Schultz;Jomella Watson-Thompson;Michael Fox

  • Some promising dimensions for behavioral community technology.

    Stephen B. Fawcett;R. Mark Mathews;R. Kay Fletcher

  • Building multisectoral partnerships for population health and health equity.

    Stephen Fawcett;Jerry Schultz;Jomella Watson-Thompson;Michael Fox

  • Empowering people with physical disabilities through advocacy skills training.

    Fabricio E. Balcazar;Tom Seekins;Stephen B. Fawcett;Bill L. Hopkins

  • A model memorandum of collaboration: a proposal.

    Stephen B. Fawcett;Vincent T. Francisco;Adrienne Paine-Andrews;Jerry A. Schultz

  • Empowering Community Health Initiatives Through Evaluation

    Stephen B. Fawcett;Adrienne Paine-Andrews;Vincent T. Francisco;Jerry A. Schultz

  • Measuring the Health Environment for Physical Activity and Nutrition among Youth: A Review of the Literature and Applications for Community Initiatives☆

    Kimber P. Richter;Kari Jo Harris;Adrienne Paine-Andrews;Stephen B. Fawcett

  • Evaluating the effects of a community coalition's efforts to reduce illegal sales of alcohol and tobacco products to minors.

    Rhonda K. Lewis;Adrienne Paine-Andrews;Stephen B. Fawcett;Vincent T. Francisco

  • Training public-speaking behavior: an experimental analysis and social validation.

    Stephen B. Fawcett;L. Keith Miller

  • Building Capacity for Participatory Evaluation Within Community Initiatives

    Stephen B. Fawcett;Renée Boothroyd;Jerry A. Schultz;Vincent T. Francisco

  • Conference report: community-based health promotion--state of the art and recommendations for the future.

    Allen Cheadle;William Beery;Edward Wagner;Stephen Fawcett

  • Reducing Elementary School Children's Risks for Chronic Diseases through School Lunch Modifications, Nutrition Education, and Physical Activity Interventions

    Kari Jo Harris;Adrienne Paine-Andrews;Kimber P. Richter;Rhonda K. Lewis

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward A. Frongillo
Edward A. Frongillo University of South Carolina
Russell R. Pate
Russell R. Pate University of South Carolina
Leonard A. Jason
Leonard A. Jason DePaul University
Richard A. Winett
Richard A. Winett Virginia Tech
Brian A. Iwata
Brian A. Iwata University of Florida
Kenneth R. McLeroy
Kenneth R. McLeroy Texas A&M University
Edith A. Parker
Edith A. Parker University of Iowa
Blake Poland
Blake Poland University of Toronto
Abraham Wandersman
Abraham Wandersman University of South Carolina
Dawn K. Wilson
Dawn K. Wilson University of South Carolina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The Social Sciences and Humanities offer a wide range of online study options, allowing students to balance education with work or other commitments. For those interested in making a difference through direct support roles, a social work accelerated program enables you to earn your degree quickly and start serving individuals and communities sooner.

If you’re drawn to understanding human behavior and mental health, pursuing an accelerated psychology degree online can open doors to various career paths, including research, counseling, and organizational consulting. Meanwhile, those who want to specialize in counseling should consider programs with recognized standards, like the cacrep accredited programs, which ensure rigorous training and can enhance employment opportunities.

For students passionate about helping couples and families, there are also online marriage and family therapy masters programs that offer flexibility and focused expertise. These degree pathways not only advance knowledge but also prepare graduates for rewarding roles in social, educational, and healthcare settings.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen B. Fawcett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles