World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stephen B. Fawcett

Stephen B. Fawcett

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 37 6139 5700 2938 2677 157 8671

Stephen B. Fawcett publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stephen B. Fawcett between 1975 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stephen B. Fawcett published across 51 years, from 1975 to 2025, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2000. 3 of the 162 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2000. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 3 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 6 publications 1982: 6 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 4 publications 1988: 9 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 3 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 5 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 2 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 7 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 7 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
1975 2025

162 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stephen B. Fawcett: publications per year, 1975 to 2025
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 0
1977 4
1978 1
1979 3
1980 4
1981 6
1982 6
1983 0
1984 6
1985 1
1986 1
1987 4
1988 9
1989 1
1990 3
1991 5
1992 2
1993 1
1994 5
1995 4
1996 4
1997 9
1998 2
1999 3
2000 12
2001 3
2002 1
2003 2
2004 1
2005 0
2006 0
2007 7
2008 3
2009 4
2010 5
2011 1
2012 2
2013 5
2014 1
2015 7
2016 1
2017 1
2018 7
2019 2
2020 2
2021 3
2022 2
2023 2
2024 1
2025 2
Total 162
Download as CSV

Stephen B. Fawcett publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen B. Fawcett sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 154–163 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 157 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411 157
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Stephen B. Fawcett D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen B. Fawcett sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272 37
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Stephen B. Fawcett is affiliated with the University of Kansas in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on health professions, with significant work in general health professions, modeling and simulation, infectious diseases, clinical psychology, and health more broadly.

Their recent publications highlight several key areas of study, including community health, health policy implementation, and infectious diseases. Notable papers authored by or involving Stephen B. Fawcett include:

  • A Reflection on Community Research and Action as an Evolving Practice, 2021, published in Behavior and Social Issues
  • Behavioral Interventions Contributing to Reducing Poverty and Inequities, 2022, Behavior and Social Issues
  • Kenya's Experience: Factors Enabling and Impeding the COVID-19 Response, 2023, Health Promotion Practice
  • Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation of the COVID-19 Response in a Local Public Health System, 2021, Health Promotion Practice
  • Strengthening Collaborative Action for Community Health and Development, 2020, American journal of health studies

Their work spans a variety of topics, such as:

  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Viral infections and outbreaks research
  • Community health and development
  • Health policy implementation science
  • COVID-19 and mental health
  • Vaccine coverage and hesitancy
  • Evaluation and performance assessment

Stephen B. Fawcett frequently publishes in venues like Health Promotion Practice, Behavior and Social Issues, American journal of health studies, and Preventing Chronic Disease. The most common publication venues for their work are:

  • Health Promotion Practice
  • Behavior and Social Issues
  • American journal of health studies
  • Preventing Chronic Disease

Coauthorship collaborations are part of their research activities, with repeated partnerships involving:

  • Peter Malekele Phori
  • Noemie Nikiema Nidjergou
  • Jemimah Mwakisha
  • Cleph Silouakadila
  • Christina Holt

Overall, Stephen B. Fawcett's research contributes to advancing knowledge in community health and infectious disease dynamics, with emphasis on evaluating and improving health system responses during the COVID-19 pandemic and broader infectious outbreaks.

Best Publications

  • A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health

    Stergios Tsai Roussos;Stephen B. Fawcett

  • Identifying and Defining the Dimensions of Community Capacity to Provide a Basis for Measurement

    Robert M. Goodman;Marjorie A. Speers;Kenneth Mcleroy;Stephen Fawcett

  • Using empowerment theory in collaborative partnerships for community health and development

    Stephen B. Fawcett;Adrienne Paine-Andrews;Vincent T. Francisco;Jerry A. Schultz

  • A contextual-behavioral model of empowerment: Case studies involving people with physical disabilities

    Stephen B. Fawcett;Glen W. White;Fabricio E. Balcazar;Yolanda Suarez-Balcazar

  • SOME VALUES GUIDING COMMUNITY RESEARCH AND ACTION

    Stephen B. Fawcett

  • Evaluating Community Coalitions for Prevention of Substance Abuse: The Case of Project Freedom

    Stephen B. Fawcett;Rhonda K. Lewis;Adrienne Paine-Andrews;Vincent T. Francisco

  • A methodology for monitoring and evaluating community health coalitions

    Vincent T. Francisco;Adrienne L. Paine;Stephen B. Fawcett

  • Social validity: a note on methodology.

    Stephen B. Fawcett

  • Rapid Assessment Procedures: A Review and Critique

    Karij Harris;Norge Jerome;Stephen Fawcett

  • Peer Reviewed: Building Multisectoral Partnerships for Population Health and Health Equity

    Stephen Fawcett;Jerry Schultz;Jomella Watson-Thompson;Michael Fox

  • Some promising dimensions for behavioral community technology.

    Stephen B. Fawcett;R. Mark Mathews;R. Kay Fletcher

  • Building multisectoral partnerships for population health and health equity.

    Stephen Fawcett;Jerry Schultz;Jomella Watson-Thompson;Michael Fox

  • Empowering people with physical disabilities through advocacy skills training.

    Fabricio E. Balcazar;Tom Seekins;Stephen B. Fawcett;Bill L. Hopkins

  • A model memorandum of collaboration: a proposal.

    Stephen B. Fawcett;Vincent T. Francisco;Adrienne Paine-Andrews;Jerry A. Schultz

  • Empowering Community Health Initiatives Through Evaluation

    Stephen B. Fawcett;Adrienne Paine-Andrews;Vincent T. Francisco;Jerry A. Schultz

  • Measuring the Health Environment for Physical Activity and Nutrition among Youth: A Review of the Literature and Applications for Community Initiatives☆

    Kimber P. Richter;Kari Jo Harris;Adrienne Paine-Andrews;Stephen B. Fawcett

  • Evaluating the effects of a community coalition's efforts to reduce illegal sales of alcohol and tobacco products to minors.

    Rhonda K. Lewis;Adrienne Paine-Andrews;Stephen B. Fawcett;Vincent T. Francisco

  • Training public-speaking behavior: an experimental analysis and social validation.

    Stephen B. Fawcett;L. Keith Miller

  • Building Capacity for Participatory Evaluation Within Community Initiatives

    Stephen B. Fawcett;Renée Boothroyd;Jerry A. Schultz;Vincent T. Francisco

  • Conference report: community-based health promotion--state of the art and recommendations for the future.

    Allen Cheadle;William Beery;Edward Wagner;Stephen Fawcett

  • Reducing Elementary School Children's Risks for Chronic Diseases through School Lunch Modifications, Nutrition Education, and Physical Activity Interventions

    Kari Jo Harris;Adrienne Paine-Andrews;Kimber P. Richter;Rhonda K. Lewis

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward A. Frongillo
Edward A. Frongillo University of South Carolina
Russell R. Pate
Russell R. Pate University of South Carolina
Leonard A. Jason
Leonard A. Jason DePaul University
Richard A. Winett
Richard A. Winett Virginia Tech
Brian A. Iwata
Brian A. Iwata University of Florida
Kenneth R. McLeroy
Kenneth R. McLeroy Texas A&M University
Edith A. Parker
Edith A. Parker University of Iowa
Blake Poland
Blake Poland University of Toronto
Abraham Wandersman
Abraham Wandersman University of South Carolina
Dawn K. Wilson
Dawn K. Wilson University of South Carolina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The Social Sciences and Humanities offer a wide range of online study options, allowing students to balance education with work or other commitments. For those interested in making a difference through direct support roles, a social work accelerated program enables you to earn your degree quickly and start serving individuals and communities sooner.

If you’re drawn to understanding human behavior and mental health, pursuing an accelerated psychology degree online can open doors to various career paths, including research, counseling, and organizational consulting. Meanwhile, those who want to specialize in counseling should consider programs with recognized standards, like the cacrep accredited programs, which ensure rigorous training and can enhance employment opportunities.

For students passionate about helping couples and families, there are also online marriage and family therapy masters programs that offer flexibility and focused expertise. These degree pathways not only advance knowledge but also prepare graduates for rewarding roles in social, educational, and healthcare settings.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen B. Fawcett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles