World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Deborah R. Azrael

Deborah R. Azrael

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 60 1484 1327 708 623 167 12170

Deborah R. Azrael publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Deborah R. Azrael between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Deborah R. Azrael published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2019. 7 of the 177 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2019. 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 3 publications
1994 2025

177 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Deborah R. Azrael: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 2
1995 3
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 6
2001 3
2002 8
2003 0
2004 6
2005 2
2006 4
2007 4
2008 2
2009 6
2010 4
2011 6
2012 5
2013 5
2014 7
2015 5
2016 9
2017 8
2018 9
2019 16
2020 14
2021 15
2022 16
2023 5
2024 4
2025 3
Total 177
Download as CSV

Deborah R. Azrael publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah R. Azrael sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 164–173 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 167 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391 167
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Deborah R. Azrael D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah R. Azrael sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106 60
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Deborah R. Azrael is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research spans several interconnected fields predominantly within the social sciences, psychology, and medicine. Azrael's contributions focus extensively on health and clinical psychology, with notable work relating to injury prevention and sociopolitical aspects of health behavior.

The scientist's principal areas of study include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology
  • Medicine

Azrael's work further delves into specialized subfields covering health, clinical psychology, ophthalmology, sociology and political science, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging. The concentration of publications shows a strong emphasis on health and clinical psychology components.

Among the main research topics explored by Azrael are:

  • Gun Ownership and Violence Research
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries
  • Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
  • Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
  • Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

The scientist has frequently published in several academic venues, including:

  • JAMA Network Open
  • Preventive Medicine
  • Injury Prevention
  • Annals of Internal Medicine
  • Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior

Recent publications provide a snapshot of their research focus, particularly concerning firearm ownership, storage practices, and associated public health implications. Representative papers include:

  • Firearm Purchasing During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results From the 2021 National Firearms Survey (2021, Annals of Internal Medicine)
  • Firearm Storage in US Households With Children (2022, JAMA Network Open)
  • Firearm purchasing and storage during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020, Injury Prevention)
  • Changes in Firearm and Medication Storage Practices in Homes of Youths at Risk for Suicide: Results of the SAFETY Study, a Clustered, Emergency Department-Based, Multisite, Stepped-Wedge Trial (2020, Annals of Emergency Medicine)
  • Parent and Adolescent Reports of Adolescent Access to Household Firearms in the United States (2021, JAMA Network Open)

Collaboration is a consistent aspect of Azrael's research output, often working with co-authors such as Matthew Miller, Catherine Barber, John Berrigan, and Matthew J. Miller. These partnerships contribute to a robust publication record spanning multiple public health and social science topics related to firearm violence and injury prevention.

Best Publications

  • Emotional Distress Among LGBT Youth: The Influence of Perceived Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation

    Joanna Almeida;Renee M. Johnson;Heather L. Corliss;Beth E. Molnar

  • Household firearm ownership and rates of suicide across the 50 United States.

    Margaret Miller;Steven J. Lippmann;Deborah R. Azrael;David A. Hemenway

  • State and Local Prevalence of Firearms Ownership Measurement, Structure, and Trends

    Deborah R. Azrael;Philip J. Cook;Margaret Miller

  • Firearm availability and unintentional firearm deaths, suicide, and homicide among 5-14 year olds.

    Margaret Miller;Deborah R. Azrael;David A. Hemenway

  • Firearm Purchasing During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results From the 2021 National Firearms Survey

    Unknown

  • Opioid Analgesics and the Risk of Fractures in Older Adults with Arthritis

    Matthew Miller;Til Stürmer;Deborah Azrael;Raisa Levin

  • Firearm Storage in Gun-Owning Households with Children: Results of a 2015 National Survey.

    Deborah Azrael;Joanna Cohen;Carmel Salhi;Matthew Miller;Matthew Miller

  • Suicide mortality in the United States: the importance of attending to method in understanding population-level disparities in the burden of suicide.

    Matthew C. Miller;Deborah R. Azrael;Catherine Barber

  • Suicide Case-Fatality Rates in the United States, 2007 to 2014: A Nationwide Population-Based Study

    Andrew Conner;Deborah Azrael;Matthew Miller

  • The epidemiology of case fatality rates for suicide in the northeast

    Margaret Miller;Deborah R. Azrael;David A. Hemenway

  • Household firearm ownership and suicide rates in the United States.

    Margaret Miller;Deborah R. Azrael;David A. Hemenway

  • Rates of Household Firearm Ownership and Homicide Across US Regions and States, 1988–1997

    Margaret Miller;Deborah R. Azrael;David A. Hemenway

  • The US gun stock: results from the 2004 national firearms survey.

    L. Hepburn;Margaret Miller;Deborah R. Azrael;David A. Hemenway

  • Association of Increased Safe Household Firearm Storage With Firearm Suicide and Unintentional Death Among US Youths.

    Michael C. Monuteaux;Deborah Azrael;Matthew Miller

  • The Stock and Flow of U.S. Firearms: Results from the 2015 National Firearms Survey

    Deborah Azrael;Lisa Hepburn;David Hemenway;Matthew Miller

  • Firearms and Suicide in the United States: Is Risk Independent of Underlying Suicidal Behavior?

    Matthew C. Miller;Catherine Barber;Richard A. White;Deborah R. Azrael

  • The association between changes in household firearm ownership and rates of suicide in the United States, 1981–2002

    Margaret Miller;Deborah R. Azrael;L. Hepburn;David A. Hemenway

  • Neighborhood Predictors of Concealed Firearm Carrying Among Children and Adolescents: Results From the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods

    Beth E. Molnar;Matthew J. Miller;Deborah Azrael;Stephen L. Buka

  • Cancer and the Risk of Suicide in Older Americans

    Matthew Miller;Helen Mogun;Deborah Azrael;Katherine Hempstead

  • Bullying and Suicidal Behaviors Among Urban High School Youth

    Lisa Hepburn;Deborah R. Azrael;Beth Molnar;Matthew C. Miller

  • Firearm training and storage.

    David Hemenway;Sara J. Solnick;Deborah R. Azrael

Frequent Co-Authors

David Hemenway
David Hemenway Harvard University
Matthew C. Miller
Matthew C. Miller Northeastern University
Beth E. Molnar
Beth E. Molnar Northeastern University
Renee M. Johnson
Renee M. Johnson Johns Hopkins University
Sonja A. Swanson
Sonja A. Swanson Erasmus University Rotterdam
Til Stürmer
Til Stürmer University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Garen J. Wintemute
Garen J. Wintemute University of California, Davis
Kenneth J. Mukamal
Kenneth J. Mukamal Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Emily F. Rothman
Emily F. Rothman Boston University
Dustin T. Duncan
Dustin T. Duncan Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities can open diverse and flexible career pathways. Many students are interested in how long it takes to earn a degree online. For those with time constraints, there are accelerated online degree programs that allow you to complete coursework faster than traditional timelines. Similarly, you can find 1 year master's programs that let you gain advanced credentials and skills in a short period.

Aspiring educators can benefit from 1 year edd programs online, which help fast-track a career in educational leadership. Cost is also a major concern. If you’re considering psychology, it’s important to understand how much does a masters in psychology cost so you can plan your education investment wisely.

In summary, online degrees offer great flexibility and choice—whether you want to finish your program quickly, specialize further, or manage costs. Explore these various pathways to take the next step in your Social Sciences or Humanities career.

Best Scientists Citing Deborah R. Azrael

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles