World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 78 1692 1609 778 733 335 24763

Scott M. Williams publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Scott M. Williams between 1981 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Scott M. Williams published across 46 years, from 1981 to 2026, averaging 10.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2008. 25 of the 484 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2008. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 3 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 3 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 24 publications 2008: 33 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 26 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 24 publications 2026: 1 publication
1981 2026

484 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Scott M. Williams: publications per year, 1981 to 2026
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 3
1986 1
1987 3
1988 0
1989 1
1990 3
1991 0
1992 2
1993 2
1994 2
1995 1
1996 3
1997 4
1998 3
1999 5
2000 2
2001 5
2002 8
2003 5
2004 9
2005 8
2006 16
2007 24
2008 33
2009 18
2010 20
2011 26
2012 21
2013 22
2014 19
2015 17
2016 17
2017 21
2018 12
2019 16
2020 21
2021 18
2022 25
2023 27
2024 15
2025 24
2026 1
Total 484
Download as CSV

Scott M. Williams publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott M. Williams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 335–344 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 335 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52 335
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Scott M. Williams D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott M. Williams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127 78
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Scott M. Williams is affiliated with Case Western Reserve University in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their work spans numerous subfields including Genetics, Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Williams has published research on a range of topics that include:

  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
  • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

The scientist's recent papers include:

  • "Genetic effects on the timing of parturition and links to fetal birth weight," 2023, Nature Genetics
  • "Dissecting maternal and fetal genetic effects underlying the associations between maternal phenotypes, birth outcomes, and adult phenotypes: A mendelian-randomization and haplotype-based genetic score analysis in 10,734 mother-infant pairs," 2020, PLoS Medicine
  • "Interaction between host genes and Mycobacterium tuberculosis lineage can affect tuberculosis severity: Evidence for coevolution?," 2020, PLoS Genetics
  • "Helicobacter pylori infection causes both protective and deleterious effects in human health and disease," 2021, Genes and Immunity
  • "A multi-cohort genome-wide association study in African ancestry individuals reveals risk loci for primary open-angle glaucoma," 2024, Cell

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Williams include:

  • Giorgio Sirugo
  • Jacquelaine Bartlett
  • Catherine M. Stein
  • Harriet Mayanja-Kizza
  • Michael L. McHenry

The scientist has frequently published in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • PLoS Genetics
  • Endocrine Abstracts
  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Best Publications

  • The Genetic Structure and History of Africans and African Americans

    Sarah A. Tishkoff;Floyd A. Reed;Françoise R. Friedlaender;Christopher Ehret

  • The DNA sequence of human chromosome 22

    I. Dunham;N. Shimizu;B. A. Roe;S. Chissoe

  • The Missing Diversity in Human Genetic Studies.

    Giorgio Sirugo;Scott M. Williams;Sarah A. Tishkoff

  • Haplotype Diversity and Linkage Disequilibrium at Human G6PD: Recent Origin of Alleles That Confer Malarial Resistance

    Sarah A. Tishkoff;Robert Varkonyi;Nelie Cahinhinan;Salem Abbes

  • Bioinformatics challenges for genome-wide association studies

    Jason H. Moore;Folkert W. Asselbergs;Scott M. Williams

  • Chloroplast DNA polymorphisms in lodgepole and jack pines and their hybrids.

    D B Wagner;G R Furnier;M A Saghai-Maroof;S M Williams

  • Genome-wide patterns of population structure and admixture in West Africans and African Americans

    Katarzyna Bryc;Adam Auton;Matthew R. Nelson;Jorge R. Oksenberg

  • A High-Density Admixture Map for Disease Gene Discovery in African Americans

    Michael W. Smith;Michael W. Smith;Nick Patterson;James A. Lautenberger;Ann L. Truelove;Ann L. Truelove

  • Genetic analysis of African populations: human evolution and complex disease

    Sarah A. Tishkoff;Scott M. Williams

  • New strategies for identifying gene-gene interactions in hypertension

    Jason H Moore;Scott M Williams

  • Epistasis and Its Implications for Personal Genetics

    Jason H. Moore;Scott M. Williams

  • Traversing the conceptual divide between biological and statistical epistasis: systems biology and a more modern synthesis.

    Jason H. Moore;Scott M. Williams

  • Cardiovascular and metabolic effects of metformin in patients with type 1 diabetes (REMOVAL): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

    John R Petrie;Nishi Chaturvedi;Ian Ford;Martijn C G J Brouwers

  • G protein-coupled receptor kinase 4 gene variants in human essential hypertension

    Robin A. Felder;Hironobu Sanada;Jing Xu;Pei Ying Yu

  • A meta-analysis identifies new loci associated with body mass index in individuals of African ancestry.

    Keri L. Monda;Keri L. Monda;Gary K. Chen;Kira C. Taylor;Kira C. Taylor;Cameron Palmer;Cameron Palmer

  • Cooperative Phosphorylation of the Tumor Suppressor Phosphatase and Tensin Homologue (PTEN) by Casein Kinases and Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3β

    Anna Maria Al-Khouri;Yuliang Ma;Summanuna H. Togo;Scott Williams

  • Failure to Replicate a Genetic Association May Provide Important Clues About Genetic Architecture

    Casey S. Greene;Nadia M. Penrod;Scott M. Williams;Jason H. Moore

  • Human and Helicobacter pylori coevolution shapes the risk of gastric disease.

    Nuri Kodaman;Alvaro Pazos;Barbara G. Schneider;M. Blanca Piazuelo

  • 5′ Flanking Variants of Resistin Are Associated With Obesity

    James C. Engert;Marie-Claude Vohl;Scott M. Williams;Pierre Lepage

  • DC-SIGN (CD209), pentraxin 3 and vitamin D receptor gene variants associate with pulmonary tuberculosis risk in West Africans.

    R Olesen;C Wejse;C Wejse;D R Velez;C Bisseye

Frequent Co-Authors

Jason H. Moore
Jason H. Moore University of Pennsylvania
Ramkumar Menon
Ramkumar Menon The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Giorgio Sirugo
Giorgio Sirugo University of Pennsylvania
Sarah A. Tishkoff
Sarah A. Tishkoff University of Pennsylvania
Louis J. Muglia
Louis J. Muglia Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Pedro A. Jose
Pedro A. Jose George Washington University
Robin A. Felder
Robin A. Felder University of Virginia
Todd L. Edwards
Todd L. Edwards Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Keith T. Wilson
Keith T. Wilson Vanderbilt University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in genetics often means you’ll explore interconnected fields in healthcare and life sciences. Many students pair genetics study with a broader understanding of the medical industry through options like a low cost medical coding and billing online program. This pathway is a practical and affordable introduction to the workings of healthcare data and patient records.

For those attracted to patient care, consider nursing programs with high acceptance rates, which offer more accessible entry points into the nursing profession. This can be a rewarding way to apply genetics in direct clinical contexts.

If you prefer managerial roles, obtaining a degree in healthcare administration can help you oversee operations in hospitals or research centers, blending scientific knowledge with leadership skills.

Many students are also seeking affordable options, such as the cheapest mha programs online. These programs offer flexibility, making it easier to pursue advanced credentials while continuing work or research in genetics.

Best Scientists Citing Scott M. Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles