World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michelle C. Kegler

Michelle C. Kegler

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 48 3148 2892 1523 1377 256 9473

Michelle C. Kegler publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michelle C. Kegler between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michelle C. Kegler published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 8.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2016. 26 of the 284 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2016. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 28 publications 2016: 29 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 10 publications
1993 2025

284 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michelle C. Kegler: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 2
1999 3
2000 4
2001 3
2002 2
2003 8
2004 7
2005 5
2006 4
2007 4
2008 6
2009 4
2010 7
2011 7
2012 11
2013 9
2014 17
2015 28
2016 29
2017 14
2018 12
2019 16
2020 17
2021 7
2022 14
2023 15
2024 16
2025 10
Total 284
Download as CSV

Michelle C. Kegler publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michelle C. Kegler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 254–263 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 256 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162 256
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Michelle C. Kegler D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michelle C. Kegler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203 48
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Michelle C. Kegler is affiliated with Emory University in the United States and has a research focus predominantly within Health Professions and Medicine. Their scholarly output spans multiple subfields including General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Health, and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management.

Their research topics cover a range of public health themes such as Health Policy Implementation Science, Smoking Behavior and Cessation, Community Health and Development, Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet, Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations, Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology, and Public Health Policies and Education.

Recent papers authored by Michelle C. Kegler include:

  • Evaluation Methods Commonly Used to Assess Effectiveness of Community Coalitions in Public Health: Results From a Scoping Review, 2020, New Directions for Evaluation
  • Home gardening and associations with fruit and vegetable intake and BMI, 2020, Public Health Nutrition
  • Inequities in Physical Activity Environments and Leisure-Time Physical Activity in Rural Communities, 2022, Preventing Chronic Disease
  • Inner and outer setting factors that influence the implementation of the National Diabetes Prevention Program (National DPP) using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): a qualitative study, 2022, Implementation Science Communications
  • Home food environment and associations with weight and diet among U.S. adults: a cross-sectional study, 2021, BMC Public Health

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Michelle C. Kegler include Regine Haardörfer, Carla J. Berg, Arevik Torosyan, Zhanna Sargsyan, and Varduhi Hayrumyan.

Key publication venues for their work comprise Tobacco Prevention & Cessation, UNC Libraries, Frontiers in Health Services, Public Health Nutrition, and the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Michelle C. Kegler has contributed to academic literature through book publications as well, including titles published by Cambridge University Press and Rutgers University Press. These include The Cambridge Handbook of Community Empowerment (2024) and Community Organizing and Community Building for Health and Social Equity, 4th edition (2022).

Best Publications

  • Community-based interventions.

    Kenneth R. McLeroy;Barbara L. Norton;Michelle C. Kegler;James N. Burdine

  • Effects of self-care, self-efficacy, social support on glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes

    Junling Gao;Jingli Wang;Pinpin Zheng;Regine Haardörfer

  • Perceived harm, addictiveness, and social acceptability of tobacco products and marijuana among young adults: marijuana, hookah, and electronic cigarettes win.

    Carla J. Berg;Erin Stratton;Gillian L. Schauer;Michael Lewis

  • Factors That Contribute to Effective Community Health Promotion Coalitions: A Study of 10 Project ASSIST Coalitions in North Carolina:

    Michelle Crozier Kegler;Allan Steckler;Kenneth Mcleroy;Sally Herndon Malek

  • Assessing the overlap between tobacco and marijuana: Trends in patterns of co-use of tobacco and marijuana in adults from 2003-2012.

    Gillian L. Schauer;Carla J. Berg;Michelle C. Kegler;Dennis M. Donovan

  • Developing measures to assess constructs from the Inner Setting domain of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

    Maria E. Fernandez;Timothy J. Walker;Bryan J. Weiner;William A. Calo

  • A Review of Qualitative Data Analysis Practices in Health Education and Health Behavior Research.

    Ilana G. Raskind;Rachel C. Shelton;Dawn L. Comeau;Hannah L. F. Cooper

  • The potential protective effects of youth assets from adolescent sexual risk behaviors

    Sara K Vesely;Vicki H Wyatt;Roy F Oman;Cheryl B Aspy

  • Proceedings from the 9th annual conference on the science of dissemination and implementation

    David Chambers;Lisa Simpson;Felicia Hill-Briggs;Gila Neta

  • The potential of computers in patient education

    Celette Sugg Skinner;Juliette C. Siegfried;Michelle C. Kegler;Victor J. Strecher

  • Attitudes toward E-Cigarettes, Reasons for Initiating E-Cigarette Use, and Changes in Smoking Behavior after Initiation: A Pilot Longitudinal Study of Regular Cigarette Smokers

    Carla J. Berg;Dana Boyd Barr;Erin Stratton;Cam Escoffery

  • An Initial Attempt at Operationalizing and Testing the Community Coalition Action Theory

    Michelle C. Kegler;Deanne W. Swan

  • Relationships Among Youth Assets and Neighborhood and Community Resources

    Michelle Crozier Kegler;Roy F. Oman;Sara K. Vesely;Kenneth R. McLeroy

  • Community coalitions for health promotion: summary and further reflections

    Kenneth R. McLeroy;Michelle Kegler;Allan Steckler;James M. Burdine

  • A multiple case study of implementation in 10 local Project ASSIST coalitions in North Carolina

    Michelle Crozier Kegler;Allan Steckler;Sally Herndon Malek;Kenneth McLeroy

  • Differences in tobacco product use among past month adult marijuana users and nonusers: Findings from the 2003–2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health.

    Gillian L. Schauer;Carla J. Berg;Michelle C. Kegler;Dennis M. Donovan

  • Balancing fidelity and adaptation: implementing evidence-based chronic disease prevention programs.

    Michelle L. Carvalho;Sally Honeycutt;Cam Escoffery;Karen Glanz

  • How does community context influence coalitions in the formation stage? a multiple case study based on the Community Coalition Action Theory

    Michelle C Kegler;Jessica Rigler;Sally Honeycutt

  • Rules regarding Marijuana and Its Use in Personal Residences: Findings from Marijuana Users and Nonusers Recruited through Social Media

    Carla J. Berg;David B. Buller;Gillian L. Schauer;Michael Windle

  • Defining “smoker”: College student attitudes and related smoking characteristics

    Carla J. Berg;Pratibha P. Parelkar;Laura Lessard;Cam Escoffery

  • Cigarette Users’ Interest in Using or Switching to Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems for Smokeless Tobacco for Harm Reduction, Cessation, or Novelty: A Cross-Sectional Survey of US Adults

    Carla J. Berg;Regine Haardoerfer;Cam Escoffery;Pinpin Zheng

Frequent Co-Authors

Carla J. Berg
Carla J. Berg George Washington University
Karen Glanz
Karen Glanz University of Pennsylvania
Maria E. Fernandez
Maria E. Fernandez The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Kenneth R. McLeroy
Kenneth R. McLeroy Texas A&M University
Matthew W. Kreuter
Matthew W. Kreuter Washington University in St. Louis
Michael Windle
Michael Windle Emory University
Daniela B. Friedman
Daniela B. Friedman University of South Carolina
Bryan J. Weiner
Bryan J. Weiner University of Washington
Cara C. Lewis
Cara C. Lewis Kaiser Permanente
Derek M. Griffith
Derek M. Griffith University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to diverse academic and career options, especially with the flexibility of online learning. Many students are choosing to pursue an online bachelor's degree to start their journey—these programs often allow for a quicker and more affordable path to graduation compared to traditional on-campus options.

For those seeking to advance their qualifications, online masters degrees in fields like psychology, sociology, or education provide specialized knowledge and immediate career benefits. If your interests lie in social work, there are numerous online msw programs designed for those aiming to make a direct impact in communities or clinical settings.

Graduates may also explore more focused pathways, such as behavior analysis. The bcba degree is ideal for individuals interested in working with children and adults with behavioral challenges. Each of these degrees helps pave the way for rewarding professional roles in education, counseling, advocacy, or research.

Best Scientists Citing Michelle C. Kegler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles