World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Germany
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
73
Citations
37323
World Ranking
1377
National Ranking
94

Stefan Hagemann publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Hagemann sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 259 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Stefan Hagemann D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Hagemann sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Germany Leader Award

Overview

Stefan Hagemann is affiliated with the Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht Centre for Materials and Coastal Research in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a notable focus on Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, and Oceanography. They also contribute to studies in Water Science and Technology as well as Environmental Engineering.

Their work covers a range of topics within Earth system sciences including climate variability and models, cryospheric studies and observations, hydrology and watershed management studies, meteorological phenomena and simulations, climate change and permafrost, flood risk assessment and management, and oceanographic and atmospheric processes.

Stefan Hagemann has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including Tobias Stacke, Johann Jungclaus, Corinna Schrum, Stephan Lorenz, and Tatiana Ilyina.

The scientist has contributed significantly to various publication venues. These include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Nature Climate Change
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Geoscientific model development

Selected recent papers by Stefan Hagemann are:

  • A roadmap for high-resolution satellite soil moisture applications - confronting product characteristics with user requirements, 2020, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Soil moisture-atmosphere feedbacks mitigate declining water availability in drylands, 2021, Nature Climate Change
  • JSBACH 3 - The land component of the MPI Earth System Model: documentation of version 3.2, 2021, Max Planck Digital Library
  • Scientific and Human Errors in a Snow Model Intercomparison, 2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) v2.0 - an extended set of large-scale diagnostics for quasi-operational and comprehensive evaluation of Earth system models in CMIP, 2020, Geoscientific model development

Best Publications

  • The ERA‐40 re‐analysis

    S. M. Uppala;P. W. Kållberg;Adrian J. Simmons;U. Andrae

  • The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM 5. PART I: Model description

    Erich Roeckner;G. Bäuml;L. Bonaventura;Renate Brokopf

  • Vulnerability of Permafrost Carbon to Climate Change: Implications for the Global Carbon Cycle

    Edward A. G. Schuur;James Bockheim;Josep G. Canadell;Eugenie Euskirchen

  • Sensitivity of Simulated Climate to Horizontal and Vertical Resolution in the ECHAM5 Atmosphere Model

    E. Roeckner;R. Brokopf;M. Esch;M. Giorgetta

  • Developments in the MPI-M Earth System Model version 1.2 (MPI-ESM1.2) and Its Response to Increasing CO2.

    Thorsten Mauritsen;Thorsten Mauritsen;Jürgen Bader;Tobias Becker;Jörg Behrens

  • Statistical bias correction of global simulated daily precipitation and temperature for the application of hydrological models

    C. Piani;G. P. Weedon;M. Best;S. M. Gomes

  • Hydrological droughts in the 21st century, hotspots and uncertainties from a global multimodel ensemble experiment

    Christel Prudhomme;Ignazio Giuntoli;Emma L. Robinson;Douglas B. Clark

  • An inter-comparison of regional climate models for Europe: model performance in present-day climate

    Daniela Jacob;Lars Bärring;Ole Bøssing Christensen;Jens Hesselbjerg Christensen

  • Can climate trends be calculated from reanalysis data

    Lennart Bengtsson;Stefan Hagemann;Kevin I. Hodges

  • Large influence of soil moisture on long-term terrestrial carbon uptake

    Julia K. Green;Sonia I. Seneviratne;Alexis M. Berg;Kirsten L. Findell

  • Multimodel Estimate of the Global Terrestrial Water Balance: Setup and First Results

    Ingjerd Haddeland;Douglas B. Clark;Wietse Franssen;Fulco Ludwig

  • Land-atmosphere feedbacks exacerbate concurrent soil drought and atmospheric aridity.

    Sha Zhou;Sha Zhou;A. Park Williams;Alexis M. Berg;Benjamin I. Cook;Benjamin I. Cook

  • Towards process-informed bias correction of climate change simulations

    Douglas Maraun;Theodore G. Shepherd;Martin Widmann;Giuseppe Zappa

  • Impact of a Statistical Bias Correction on the Projected Hydrological Changes Obtained from Three GCMs and Two Hydrology Models

    Stefan Hagemann;Cui Chen;Jan O. Haerter;Jens Heinke

  • Land–atmosphere feedbacks amplify aridity increase over land under global warming

    Alexis Berg;Kirsten Findell;Benjamin Lintner;Alessandra Giannini

  • Climate change impact on available water resources obtained using multiple global climate and hydrology models

    S. Hagemann;Cui Chen;D. B. Clark;S. Folwell

  • A parametrization of the lateral waterflow for the global scale

    S. Hagemann;L. Dümenil

  • Impact of soil moisture-climate feedbacks on CMIP5 projections: First results from the GLACE-CMIP5 experiment

    Sonia I. Seneviratne;Micah Wilhelm;Tanja Stanelle;Bart van den Hurk

  • On interpreting hydrological change from regional climate models

    L. Phil Graham;Stefan Hagemann;Simon Jaun;Martin Beniston

  • Reconstructing, Monitoring, and Predicting Multidecadal-Scale Changes in the North Atlantic Thermohaline Circulation with Sea Surface Temperature

    Mojib Latif;Erich Roeckner;Michael Botzet;Monika Esch

  • The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM5 Part II: Sensitivity of simulated climate to horizontal and vertical resolution

    Erich Roeckner;Renate Brokopf;Monika Esch;Marko Giorgetta

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniela Jacob
Daniela Jacob Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht Centre for Materials and Coastal Research
Victor Brovkin
Victor Brovkin Max Planck Society
Martin Claussen
Martin Claussen Universität Hamburg
Erich Roeckner
Erich Roeckner Max Planck Society
Uwe Mikolajewicz
Uwe Mikolajewicz Max Planck Society
Wolfgang A. Müller
Wolfgang A. Müller Max Planck Society
Pierre Gentine
Pierre Gentine Columbia University
Fulco Ludwig
Fulco Ludwig Wageningen University & Research
Christian Beer
Christian Beer Stockholm University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career options that often benefit from advanced degrees. For those seeking leadership roles or specialized expertise, pursuing a doctorate degree online no dissertation can be an efficient way to enhance qualifications without the traditional dissertation hurdle.

Educators and professionals aiming to transition smoothly into higher academic ranks may consider accredited eds to edd programs. These programs offer seamless progression from Educational Specialist (EdS) degrees to Doctor of Education (EdD), enabling career growth in environmental education and policy-making.

For those interested in social aspects of environmental work, an online dsw programs in social work provide pathways to impact communities and promote sustainable practices. These programs emphasize social justice and community resilience—key components in environmental sustainability.

Alternatively, students looking for flexibility might explore an affordable online general studies degree. This broad approach allows for interdisciplinary study that can complement environmental sciences with courses in policy, communication, or technology, thereby broadening career possibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Stefan Hagemann

Trending Scientists