World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Santiago Rodríguez de Córdoba

Santiago Rodríguez de Córdoba

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
76
Citations
37066
World Ranking
1793
National Ranking
21

Santiago Rodríguez de Córdoba publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Santiago Rodríguez de Córdoba sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 216 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Santiago Rodríguez de Córdoba D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Santiago Rodríguez de Córdoba sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Santiago Rodríguez de Córdoba is affiliated with the Spanish National Research Council in Spain and specializes in research primarily within the fields of Medicine and Immunology and Microbiology. Their scholarly work spans a range of topics related to the immune system and renal health, with a distinct focus on the complement system in diseases and renal pathologies.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Complement system in diseases
  • Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
  • Blood groups and transfusion
  • Platelet Disorders and Treatments
  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema

Their key subfields of study are:

  • Immunology
  • Hematology
  • Nephrology
  • Genetics
  • Transplantation

Several frequent publication venues for Santiago Rodríguez de Córdoba include:

  • Frontiers in Immunology
  • Immunobiology
  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • Blood
  • Kidney International

Among recent published papers are:

  • "The role of complement in kidney disease: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference," 2024, Kidney International
  • "Mycophenolate Mofetil in C3 Glomerulopathy and Pathogenic Drivers of the Disease," 2020, Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • "Complement C5 Protein as a Marker of Subclinical Atherosclerosis," 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • "Functional characterization of 105 factor H variants associated with aHUS: lessons for variant classification," 2021, Blood
  • "Thrombotic microangiopathy in patients with malignant hypertension," 2022, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

The scientist frequently collaborates with a group of co-authors, including:

  • Emilia Arjona
  • Elena Goicoechea de Jorge
  • Ana Huerta
  • Héctor Martín Merinero
  • Manuel Praga

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Fabio C. Abdalla;Hagai Abeliovich;Robert T. Abraham

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Genomic sequence of the pathogenic and allergenic filamentous fungus Aspergillus fumigatus

    William C. Nierman;William C. Nierman;Arnab Pain;Michael J. Anderson;Jennifer R. Wortman;Jennifer R. Wortman

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • The human complement factor H: functional roles, genetic variations and disease associations.

    Santiago Rodrı́guez de Córdoba;Jorge Esparza-Gordillo;Elena Goicoechea de Jorge;Margarita Lopez-Trascasa

  • Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and C3 glomerulopathy: conclusions from a “Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes” (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

    Timothy H.J. Goodship;H. Terence Cook;Fadi Fakhouri;Fernando C. Fervenza

  • C3 glomerulopathy: consensus report

    Matthew C. Pickering;Vivette D. D'agati;Carla M. Nester;Richard J. Smith

  • Intracellular Complement Activation Sustains T Cell Homeostasis and Mediates Effector Differentiation

    M. Kathryn Liszewski;Martin Kolev;Gaelle Le Friec;Marilyn Leung

  • Gain-of-function mutations in complement factor B are associated with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome.

    Elena Goicoechea de Jorge;Claire L. Harris;Jorge Esparza-Gordillo;Luis Carreras

  • Mechanism suppressing glycogen synthesis in neurons and its demise in progressive myoclonus epilepsy.

    David Vilchez;Susana Ros;Daniel Cifuentes;Lluís Pujadas

  • Combined Complement Gene Mutations in Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Influence Clinical Phenotype

    Elena Bresin;Erica Rurali;Jessica Caprioli;Pilar Sanchez-Corral

  • C3 glomerulopathy — understanding a rare complement-driven renal disease

    Richard J.H. Smith;Gerald B. Appel;Anna M. Blom;H. Terence Cook

  • Identification of a mutation in complement factor H-related protein 5 in patients of Cypriot origin with glomerulonephritis

    Daniel P Gale;Daniel P Gale;Elena Goicoechea de Jorge;H Terence Cook;Rubén Martinez-Barricarte

  • Differences in reactive oxygen species production explain the phenotypes associated with common mouse mitochondrial DNA variants.

    Raquel Moreno-Loshuertos;Rebeca Acín-Pérez;Patricio Fernández-Silva;Nieves Movilla

  • Spontaneous hemolytic uremic syndrome triggered by complement factor H lacking surface recognition domains

    Matthew C. Pickering;Elena Goicoechea de Jorge;Rubén Martinez-Barricarte;Sergio Recalde

  • Clustering of Missense Mutations in the C-Terminal Region of Factor H in Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome

    David Pérez-Caballero;Carolina González-Rubio;M.Esther Gallardo;Mariá Vera

  • Predisposition to atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome involves the concurrence of different susceptibility alleles in the regulators of complement activation gene cluster in 1q32

    Jorge Esparza-Gordillo;Elena Goicoechea de Jorge;Alfonso Buil;Luis Carreras Berges

  • New Approaches to the Treatment of Dense Deposit Disease

    Richard J.H. Smith;Jessy Alexander;Paul N. Barlow;Marina Botto

  • Erratum to: Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition) (Autophagy, 12, 1, 1-222, 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • ATYPICAL HEMOLYTIC UREMIC SYNDROME AND C3 GLOMERULOPATHY: CONCLUSIONS FROM A «KIDNEY DISEASE: IMPROVING GLOBAL OUTCOMES» (KDIGO) CONTROVERSIES CONFERENCE

    Timothy H.J. Goodship;H. Terence Cook;Fadi Fakhouri;Fernando C. Fervenza

Frequent Co-Authors

Margarita López-Trascasa
Margarita López-Trascasa Autonomous University of Madrid
Claire L. Harris
Claire L. Harris Newcastle University
B. Paul Morgan
B. Paul Morgan Cardiff University
Oscar Llorca
Oscar Llorca Spanish National Research Council
Marina Noris
Marina Noris Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research
Pascual Sanz
Pascual Sanz Spanish National Research Council
Erwin Knecht
Erwin Knecht University of Valencia
Timothy H.J. Goodship
Timothy H.J. Goodship Newcastle University
Giuseppe Remuzzi
Giuseppe Remuzzi Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Genetics is closely linked to various healthcare professions, many of which offer flexible online study options. Those interested in applying genetic concepts to patient care can consider nursing and advanced practice roles.

For example, an online nursing degree provides foundational knowledge in biology and healthcare, helping students prepare for roles where genetic literacy is increasingly important. Used in combination with specialized nurse practitioner courses online, graduates can transition into advanced practice positions that often include genetics-based patient counseling and care.

Those already licensed as RNs may choose to advance their education through the best online rn to bsn programs. This path emphasizes leadership, research, and expanded clinical skills—important for integrating genetics into daily nursing practice.

For a deeper dive into clinical research and leadership, the best online dnp programs offer advanced study. These programs often include coursework in genetics, policy, and evidence-based practice, enabling graduates to shape the future of genetic healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Santiago Rodríguez de Córdoba

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles