World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Rory Hachamovitch

Rory Hachamovitch

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
29543
World Ranking
17396
National Ranking
8711

Rory Hachamovitch publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rory Hachamovitch sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 324 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Rory Hachamovitch D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rory Hachamovitch sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rory Hachamovitch is affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic in the United States and conducts research primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work spans several subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's research emphasizes topics such as Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics, Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics, Amyloidosis including its diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments, Sarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity Research, as well as Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Circulation
  • American Heart Journal

Their recent published papers include:

  • Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Stress Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Stable Chest Pain Syndromes, 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
  • Recommendations for Statistical Reporting in Cardiovascular Medicine: A Special Report From the American Heart Association, 2021, Circulation
  • Impact of Complete Revascularization in the ISCHEMIA Trial, 2023, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Performance of diagnostic criteria in patients clinically judged to have cardiac sarcoidosis: Is it time to regroup?, 2020, American Heart Journal
  • Aortic Valve Calcium in Patients With Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis, 2020, Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging

Rory Hachamovitch often collaborates with other researchers in their field. Frequent co-authors include Wael A. Jaber, Paul Cremer, Christine Jellis, Muzna Hussain, and Mazen Hanna.

Best Publications

  • Comparison of the Short-Term Survival Benefit Associated With Revascularization Compared With Medical Therapy in Patients With No Prior Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Stress Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography

    Rory Hachamovitch;Sean W. Hayes;John D. Friedman;Ishac Cohen

  • Myocardial viability testing and impact of revascularization on prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: a meta-analysis.

    Kevin C Allman;Leslee J Shaw;Rory Hachamovitch;James E Udelson

  • Incremental Prognostic Value of Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography for the Prediction of Cardiac Death Differential Stratification for Risk of Cardiac Death and Myocardial Infarction

    Rory Hachamovitch;Daniel S. Berman;Leslee J. Shaw;Hosen Kiat;Hosen Kiat

  • American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association expert consensus document on electron-beam computed tomography for the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease

    Robert A O’Rourke;Bruce H Brundage;Victor F Froelicher;Philip Greenland

  • Angiogenesis Gene Therapy Phase I Assessment of Direct Intramyocardial Administration of an Adenovirus Vector Expressing VEGF121 cDNA to Individuals With Clinically Significant Severe Coronary Artery Disease

    Todd K. Rosengart;Leonard Y. Lee;Shailen R. Patel;Timothy A. Sanborn

  • Exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without known coronary artery disease : Incremental prognostic value and use in risk stratification

    Rory Hachamovitch;Daniel S. Berman;Hosen Kiat;Ishac Cohen

  • Incremental value of prognostic testing in patients with known or suspected ischemic heart disease: a basis for optimal utilization of exercise technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography.

    Daniel S. Berman;Rory Hachamovitch;Hosen Kiat;Ishac Cohen

  • Complications of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for treatment of cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis of 1,866 adult patients.

    Richard Cheng;Rory Hachamovitch;Michelle Kittleson;Jignesh Patel

  • Impact of ischaemia and scar on the therapeutic benefit derived from myocardial revascularization vs. medical therapy among patients undergoing stress-rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.

    Rory Hachamovitch;Alan Rozanski;Leslee J. Shaw;Gregg W. Stone

  • Relationship between stress-induced myocardial ischemia and atherosclerosis measured by coronary calcium tomography.

    Daniel S. Berman;Daniel S. Berman;Nathan D. Wong;Heidi Gransar;Heidi Gransar;Romalisa Miranda-Peats;Romalisa Miranda-Peats

  • Determinants of risk and its temporal variation in patients with normal stress myocardial perfusion scans : What is the warranty period of a normal scan?

    Rory Hachamovitch;Sean Hayes;John D. Friedman;Ishac Cohen

  • Interrelation of Coronary Calcification, Myocardial Ischemia, and Outcomes in Patients With Intermediate Likelihood of Coronary Artery Disease A Combined Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Study

    Matthew P. Schenker;Sharmila Dorbala;Eric Cho Tek Hong;Frank J. Rybicki

  • Impact of Diabetes on the Risk Stratification Using Stress Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Symptoms Suggestive of Coronary Artery Disease

    Satyendra Giri;Leslee J. Shaw;Dakshina R. Murthy;Mark I. Travin

  • The economic consequences of available diagnostic and prognostic strategies for the evaluation of stable angina patients: an observational assessment of the value of precatheterization ischemia

    Leslee J. Shaw;Rory Hachamovitch;Daniel S. Berman;Thomas H. Marwick

  • Global coronary flow reserve is associated with adverse cardiovascular events independently of luminal angiographic severity and modifies the effect of early revascularization.

    Viviany R. Taqueti;Rory Hachamovitch;Venkatesh L. Murthy;Masanao Naya

  • Adenosine myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in women compared with men: Impact of diabetes mellitus on incremental prognostic value and effect on patient management

    Daniel S Berman;Xingping Kang;Sean W Hayes;John D Friedman

  • New Technology for Noninvasive Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease

    Marcelo F. Di Carli;Rory Hachamovitch

  • Prognostic validation of a 17-segment score derived from a 20-segment score for myocardial perfusion SPECT interpretation.

    Daniel S. Berman;Aiden Abidov;Xingping Kang;Sean W. Hayes

  • Identification of severe and extensive coronary artery disease by automatic measurement of transient ischemic dilation of the left ventricle in dual-isotope myocardial perfusion SPECT

    Marco Mazzanti;Guido Germano;Hosen Kiat;Paul B. Kavanagh

  • Aortic Size Assessment by Noncontrast Cardiac Computed Tomography: Normal Limits by Age, Gender, and Body Surface Area

    Arik Wolak;Heidi Gransar;Louise E.J. Thomson;John D. Friedman

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas H. Marwick
Thomas H. Marwick Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute
Daniel S. Berman
Daniel S. Berman Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Leslee J. Shaw
Leslee J. Shaw Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Brian P. Griffin
Brian P. Griffin Cleveland Clinic
Zoran B. Popović
Zoran B. Popović Cleveland Clinic
Marcelo F. Di Carli
Marcelo F. Di Carli Brigham and Women's Hospital
Guido Germano
Guido Germano Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
James K. Min
James K. Min NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital
Milind Y. Desai
Milind Y. Desai Cleveland Clinic
Randall C. Starling
Randall C. Starling Cleveland Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in healthcare but not sure if becoming a doctor is the right fit? The field offers a variety of alternative career pathways and flexible online degrees suited to different interests and timeframes. For example, those who want a leadership role in hospitals or clinics may consider healthcare administration degree programs. These accelerated online options can quickly prepare you for in-demand management roles.

Nurses looking to expand their clinical scope without earning another bachelor's degree can explore adn to fnp programs. These ADN to MSN bridge degrees offer efficient pathways to become a family nurse practitioner, with most coursework completed online.

If your passion lies in diet and wellness, online nutrition degrees allow you to study science-backed approaches to healthy living, qualifying graduates for roles in clinical nutrition, wellness coaching, and more.

Lastly, those seeking high-level healthcare administration credentials should consider cahme accredited mha online programs. These programs carry an industry-respected accreditation, preparing students for healthcare executive positions nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Rory Hachamovitch

Trending Scientists