World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Rory Hachamovitch

Rory Hachamovitch

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 79 17395 16345 8710 8046 324 29543

Rory Hachamovitch publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rory Hachamovitch between 1987 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rory Hachamovitch published across 38 years, from 1987 to 2024, averaging 8.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2012. 2 of the 322 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2012. 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 14 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 20 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 25 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication
1987 2024

322 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rory Hachamovitch: publications per year, 1987 to 2024
Year Publications
1987 2
1988 0
1989 1
1990 0
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 7
1996 9
1997 10
1998 9
1999 14
2000 11
2001 4
2002 7
2003 13
2004 20
2005 4
2006 11
2007 9
2008 9
2009 9
2010 8
2011 12
2012 25
2013 24
2014 19
2015 9
2016 15
2017 15
2018 15
2019 10
2020 10
2021 8
2022 0
2023 1
2024 1
Total 322
Download as CSV

Rory Hachamovitch publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rory Hachamovitch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 324 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895 324
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Rory Hachamovitch D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rory Hachamovitch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891 79
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Rory Hachamovitch is affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic in the United States and conducts research primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work spans several subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's research emphasizes topics such as Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics, Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics, Amyloidosis including its diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments, Sarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity Research, as well as Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Circulation
  • American Heart Journal

Their recent published papers include:

  • Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Stress Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Stable Chest Pain Syndromes, 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
  • Recommendations for Statistical Reporting in Cardiovascular Medicine: A Special Report From the American Heart Association, 2021, Circulation
  • Impact of Complete Revascularization in the ISCHEMIA Trial, 2023, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Performance of diagnostic criteria in patients clinically judged to have cardiac sarcoidosis: Is it time to regroup?, 2020, American Heart Journal
  • Aortic Valve Calcium in Patients With Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis, 2020, Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging

Rory Hachamovitch often collaborates with other researchers in their field. Frequent co-authors include Wael A. Jaber, Paul Cremer, Christine Jellis, Muzna Hussain, and Mazen Hanna.

Best Publications

  • Comparison of the Short-Term Survival Benefit Associated With Revascularization Compared With Medical Therapy in Patients With No Prior Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Stress Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography

    Rory Hachamovitch;Sean W. Hayes;John D. Friedman;Ishac Cohen

  • Myocardial viability testing and impact of revascularization on prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: a meta-analysis.

    Kevin C Allman;Leslee J Shaw;Rory Hachamovitch;James E Udelson

  • Incremental Prognostic Value of Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography for the Prediction of Cardiac Death Differential Stratification for Risk of Cardiac Death and Myocardial Infarction

    Rory Hachamovitch;Daniel S. Berman;Leslee J. Shaw;Hosen Kiat;Hosen Kiat

  • American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association expert consensus document on electron-beam computed tomography for the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease

    Robert A O’Rourke;Bruce H Brundage;Victor F Froelicher;Philip Greenland

  • Angiogenesis Gene Therapy Phase I Assessment of Direct Intramyocardial Administration of an Adenovirus Vector Expressing VEGF121 cDNA to Individuals With Clinically Significant Severe Coronary Artery Disease

    Todd K. Rosengart;Leonard Y. Lee;Shailen R. Patel;Timothy A. Sanborn

  • Exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without known coronary artery disease : Incremental prognostic value and use in risk stratification

    Rory Hachamovitch;Daniel S. Berman;Hosen Kiat;Ishac Cohen

  • Incremental value of prognostic testing in patients with known or suspected ischemic heart disease: a basis for optimal utilization of exercise technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography.

    Daniel S. Berman;Rory Hachamovitch;Hosen Kiat;Ishac Cohen

  • Complications of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for treatment of cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis of 1,866 adult patients.

    Richard Cheng;Rory Hachamovitch;Michelle Kittleson;Jignesh Patel

  • Impact of ischaemia and scar on the therapeutic benefit derived from myocardial revascularization vs. medical therapy among patients undergoing stress-rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.

    Rory Hachamovitch;Alan Rozanski;Leslee J. Shaw;Gregg W. Stone

  • Relationship between stress-induced myocardial ischemia and atherosclerosis measured by coronary calcium tomography.

    Daniel S. Berman;Daniel S. Berman;Nathan D. Wong;Heidi Gransar;Heidi Gransar;Romalisa Miranda-Peats;Romalisa Miranda-Peats

  • Determinants of risk and its temporal variation in patients with normal stress myocardial perfusion scans : What is the warranty period of a normal scan?

    Rory Hachamovitch;Sean Hayes;John D. Friedman;Ishac Cohen

  • Interrelation of Coronary Calcification, Myocardial Ischemia, and Outcomes in Patients With Intermediate Likelihood of Coronary Artery Disease A Combined Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Study

    Matthew P. Schenker;Sharmila Dorbala;Eric Cho Tek Hong;Frank J. Rybicki

  • Impact of Diabetes on the Risk Stratification Using Stress Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Symptoms Suggestive of Coronary Artery Disease

    Satyendra Giri;Leslee J. Shaw;Dakshina R. Murthy;Mark I. Travin

  • The economic consequences of available diagnostic and prognostic strategies for the evaluation of stable angina patients: an observational assessment of the value of precatheterization ischemia

    Leslee J. Shaw;Rory Hachamovitch;Daniel S. Berman;Thomas H. Marwick

  • Global coronary flow reserve is associated with adverse cardiovascular events independently of luminal angiographic severity and modifies the effect of early revascularization.

    Viviany R. Taqueti;Rory Hachamovitch;Venkatesh L. Murthy;Masanao Naya

  • Adenosine myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in women compared with men: Impact of diabetes mellitus on incremental prognostic value and effect on patient management

    Daniel S Berman;Xingping Kang;Sean W Hayes;John D Friedman

  • New Technology for Noninvasive Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease

    Marcelo F. Di Carli;Rory Hachamovitch

  • Prognostic validation of a 17-segment score derived from a 20-segment score for myocardial perfusion SPECT interpretation.

    Daniel S. Berman;Aiden Abidov;Xingping Kang;Sean W. Hayes

  • Identification of severe and extensive coronary artery disease by automatic measurement of transient ischemic dilation of the left ventricle in dual-isotope myocardial perfusion SPECT

    Marco Mazzanti;Guido Germano;Hosen Kiat;Paul B. Kavanagh

  • Aortic Size Assessment by Noncontrast Cardiac Computed Tomography: Normal Limits by Age, Gender, and Body Surface Area

    Arik Wolak;Heidi Gransar;Louise E.J. Thomson;John D. Friedman

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas H. Marwick
Thomas H. Marwick Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute
Daniel S. Berman
Daniel S. Berman Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Leslee J. Shaw
Leslee J. Shaw Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Brian P. Griffin
Brian P. Griffin Cleveland Clinic
Zoran B. Popović
Zoran B. Popović Cleveland Clinic
Marcelo F. Di Carli
Marcelo F. Di Carli Brigham and Women's Hospital
Guido Germano
Guido Germano Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
James K. Min
James K. Min NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital
Milind Y. Desai
Milind Y. Desai Cleveland Clinic
Randall C. Starling
Randall C. Starling Cleveland Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in healthcare but not sure if becoming a doctor is the right fit? The field offers a variety of alternative career pathways and flexible online degrees suited to different interests and timeframes. For example, those who want a leadership role in hospitals or clinics may consider healthcare administration degree programs. These accelerated online options can quickly prepare you for in-demand management roles.

Nurses looking to expand their clinical scope without earning another bachelor's degree can explore adn to fnp programs. These ADN to MSN bridge degrees offer efficient pathways to become a family nurse practitioner, with most coursework completed online.

If your passion lies in diet and wellness, online nutrition degrees allow you to study science-backed approaches to healthy living, qualifying graduates for roles in clinical nutrition, wellness coaching, and more.

Lastly, those seeking high-level healthcare administration credentials should consider cahme accredited mha online programs. These programs carry an industry-respected accreditation, preparing students for healthcare executive positions nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Rory Hachamovitch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles