| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Molecular Biology | 79 | 1031 | 542 | 105 | 27280 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Richard M. Lawn between 1977 and 2015, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard M. Lawn published across 39 years, from 1977 to 2015, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 1985. 2 of the 162 publications appeared in the last two years.
162 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1977 | 1 |
| 1978 | 2 |
| 1979 | 2 |
| 1980 | 4 |
| 1981 | 9 |
| 1982 | 6 |
| 1983 | 2 |
| 1984 | 4 |
| 1985 | 13 |
| 1986 | 10 |
| 1987 | 13 |
| 1988 | 6 |
| 1989 | 1 |
| 1990 | 5 |
| 1991 | 5 |
| 1992 | 2 |
| 1993 | 5 |
| 1994 | 8 |
| 1995 | 9 |
| 1996 | 4 |
| 1997 | 8 |
| 1998 | 4 |
| 1999 | 4 |
| 2000 | 10 |
| 2001 | 7 |
| 2002 | 3 |
| 2003 | 2 |
| 2004 | 2 |
| 2005 | 2 |
| 2006 | 1 |
| 2007 | 0 |
| 2008 | 4 |
| 2009 | 1 |
| 2010 | 1 |
| 2011 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0 |
| 2014 | 0 |
| 2015 | 2 |
| Total | 162 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Lawn sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 105 publications — 14th percentile
14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 47–56 | 7 | |
| 57–66 | 17 | |
| 67–76 | 65 | |
| 77–86 | 90 | |
| 87–96 | 125 | |
| 97–106 | 131 | 105 |
| 107–116 | 162 | |
| 117–126 | 177 | |
| 127–136 | 158 | |
| 137–146 | 158 | |
| 147–156 | 146 | |
| 157–166 | 159 | |
| 167–176 | 131 | |
| 177–186 | 110 | |
| 187–196 | 112 | |
| 197–206 | 100 | |
| 207–216 | 89 | |
| 217–226 | 98 | |
| 227–236 | 74 | |
| 237–246 | 72 | |
| 247–256 | 63 | |
| 257–266 | 53 | |
| 267–276 | 54 | |
| 277–286 | 49 | |
| 287–296 | 52 | |
| 297–306 | 43 | |
| 307–316 | 46 | |
| 317–326 | 41 | |
| 327–336 | 42 | |
| 337–346 | 31 | |
| 347–356 | 28 | |
| 357–366 | 29 | |
| 367–376 | 26 | |
| 377–386 | 24 | |
| 387–396 | 24 | |
| 397–406 | 14 | |
| 407–416 | 13 | |
| 417–426 | 20 | |
| 427–436 | 12 | |
| 437–446 | 20 | |
| 447–456 | 11 | |
| 457–466 | 10 | |
| 467–476 | 14 | |
| 477–486 | 14 | |
| 487–496 | 10 | |
| 497–506 | 13 | |
| 507–516 | 13 | |
| 517–526 | 2 | |
| 527–536 | 4 | |
| 537–546 | 6 | |
| 547–556 | 8 | |
| 557–563 | 6 | |
| 564+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Lawn sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 79 D-Index — 67th percentile
67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 40–41 | 36 | |
| 42–43 | 101 | |
| 44–45 | 115 | |
| 46–47 | 121 | |
| 48–49 | 118 | |
| 50–51 | 130 | |
| 52–53 | 106 | |
| 54–55 | 116 | |
| 56–57 | 113 | |
| 58–59 | 129 | |
| 60–61 | 120 | |
| 62–63 | 105 | |
| 64–65 | 131 | |
| 66–67 | 95 | |
| 68–69 | 97 | |
| 70–71 | 106 | |
| 72–73 | 83 | |
| 74–75 | 89 | |
| 76–77 | 77 | |
| 78–79 | 70 | 79 |
| 80–81 | 73 | |
| 82–83 | 60 | |
| 84–85 | 48 | |
| 86–87 | 45 | |
| 88–89 | 50 | |
| 90–91 | 31 | |
| 92–93 | 51 | |
| 94–95 | 43 | |
| 96–97 | 38 | |
| 98–99 | 39 | |
| 100–101 | 41 | |
| 102–103 | 29 | |
| 104–105 | 33 | |
| 106–107 | 35 | |
| 108–109 | 20 | |
| 110–111 | 38 | |
| 112–113 | 19 | |
| 114–115 | 28 | |
| 116–117 | 13 | |
| 118–119 | 23 | |
| 120–121 | 16 | |
| 122–123 | 15 | |
| 124–125 | 11 | |
| 126–127 | 21 | |
| 128–129 | 7 | |
| 130–131 | 13 | |
| 132–133 | 14 | |
| 134–135 | 17 | |
| 136–137 | 9 | |
| 138–139 | 8 | |
| 140–141 | 16 | |
| 142–143 | 7 | |
| 144 | 7 | |
| 145+ | 100 |
Richard M. Lawn is affiliated with Genentech in the United States. Their professional focus is centered within the field of biotechnology and pharmaceutical research as indicated by their association with a leading biopharmaceutical company.
There are no recorded publications, co-authors, or frequent publication venues linked to Richard M. Lawn to provide insight into specific research outputs or collaborative networks. Similarly, there is no available data on their main or subfields of study, topics of research, or book publications that could further elaborate on their academic contributions.
Information on awards or recognitions for Richard M. Lawn is also not present, leaving their professional milestones and distinctions unreported.
Despite the limited detailed academic data, the affiliation with Genentech suggests involvement in areas related to drug development, biotechnology innovation, or related pharmaceutical sciences, areas in which the company is well recognized for its work.
John W. McLean;James E. Tomlinson;Wun-Jing Kuang;Dan L. Eaton
Argiris Efstratiadis;James W. Posakony;Tom Maniatis;Richard M. Lawn
Jane Gitschier;William I. Wood;Therese M. Goralka;Karen L. Wion
Richard M. Lawn;Edward F. Fritsch;Richard C. Parker;Geoffrey Blake
Gordon A. Vehar;Bruce Keyt;Dan Eaton;Henry Rodriguez
William I. Wood;Jane Gitschier;Laurence A. Lasky;Richard M. Lawn
William I. Wood;Daniel J. Capon;Christian C. Simonsen;Dan L. Eaton
David V. Goeddel;David W. Leung;Thomas J. Dull;Mitchell Gross
Karen L. Wion;Todd G. Kirchgessner;Aldons J. Lusis;Michael C. Schotz
Richard M. Lawn;Argiris Efstratiadis;Argiris Efstratiadis;Catherine O'Connell;Tom Maniatis
John F. Oram;Richard M. Lawn
Dan L. Eaton;Gunther M. Fless;William J. Kohr;John W. McLean
Karen Schwartz;Richard M. Lawn;David P. Wade
Edward F. Fritsch;Richard M. Lawn;Tom Maniatis
Dennis Drayna;Alisha Stephens Jarnagin;John McLean;William Henzel
Daniel J. Capon;Richard M. Lawn;Gordon A. Vehar;William I. Wood
Richard M. Lawn;David P. Wade;Robert E. Hammer;Giulia Chiesa
Angelo M. Scanu;Richard M. Lawn;Kåre Berg
Dan L. Eaton;William I. Wood;Debbie Eaton;Philip E. Hass
Karen L. Wion;Deirdre Kelly;John A. Summerfield;Edward G. D. Tuddenham
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Exploring Molecular Biology in the USA can open doors to a variety of related online degrees that blend life sciences with psychology and counseling. Students often pair their interests in biology with fields like forensic psychology, which investigates the link between criminal behavior and biological factors. If you’re curious about similar intersections, you may want to look into what can i do with a masters in forensic psychology to understand career applications that blend biological and psychological expertise.
Those interested in the mental and emotional development of young people may consider a masters in child psychology online. This path is highly relevant for students considering careers in research, healthcare, or education where understanding both molecular and behavioral aspects is key.
Additionally, if you’re thinking about roles in therapy or guidance, an online master's in counseling can provide skills essential for supporting individuals’ mental health, often complementing molecular or clinical perspectives.
For those drawn to treatment, diagnosis, and patient care, exploring online clinical psychology programs can help you bridge scientific knowledge with real-world clinical applications, expanding your career opportunities beyond laboratory research.
