World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Renée Schroeder

Renée Schroeder

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 45 2859 2598 18 16 94 8452

Renée Schroeder publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Renée Schroeder between 1981 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Renée Schroeder published across 40 years, from 1981 to 2020, averaging 2.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2007. 2 of the 97 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2007. 1981: 2 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 2 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication
1981 2020

97 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Renée Schroeder: publications per year, 1981 to 2020
Year Publications
1981 2
1982 1
1983 2
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 1
1990 0
1991 1
1992 2
1993 3
1994 1
1995 1
1996 3
1997 1
1998 4
1999 5
2000 3
2001 2
2002 4
2003 3
2004 3
2005 3
2006 8
2007 9
2008 6
2009 2
2010 4
2011 2
2012 2
2013 4
2014 4
2015 1
2016 2
2017 4
2018 1
2019 1
2020 1
Total 97
Download as CSV

Renée Schroeder publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Renée Schroeder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 87–96 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 94 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125 94
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Renée Schroeder D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Renée Schroeder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115 45
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Renée Schroeder is affiliated with the Max F. Perutz Laboratories in Austria. Their research spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on Molecular Biology as a key subfield.

The scientific work primarily covers topics related to RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, RNA research and splicing, and RNA interference and gene delivery.

Recent publications include the paper titled RNA polymerase II-binding aptamers in human ACRO1 satellites disrupt transcription in cis, published in 2020 in the journal Transcription. This paper has been cited multiple times since its publication.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Renée Schroeder include:

  • Jennifer L. Boots
  • Frederike von Pelchrzim
  • Adam Weiss
  • Bob Zimmermann
  • Theres Friesacher

Publications have mainly appeared in the venue Transcription, reflecting a focused engagement with this journal for disseminating research findings.

Best Publications

  • Characterization of HULC, a novel gene with striking up-regulation in hepatocellular carcinoma, as noncoding RNA.

    Katrin Panzitt;Marisa M.O. Tschernatsch;Christian Guelly;Tarek Moustafa

  • Molecular basis for target RNA recognition and cleavage by human RISC.

    Stefan Ludwig Ameres;Javier Martinez;Renée Schroeder

  • RNA chaperones, RNA annealers and RNA helicases.

    Lukas Rajkowitsch;Doris Chen;Sabine Stampfl;Katharina Semrad

  • Strategies for RNA folding and assembly

    Renée Schroeder;Andrea Barta;Katharina Semrad

  • The impact of target site accessibility on the design of effective siRNAs.

    Hakim Tafer;Stefan L Ameres;Stefan L Ameres;Gregor Obernosterer;Christoph A Gebeshuber

  • A tetracycline-binding RNA aptamer.

    Christian Berens;Alison Thain;Renée Schroeder

  • Conditional gene expression by controlling translation with tetracycline-binding aptamers.

    Beatrix Suess;Shane Hanson;Christian Berens;Barbara Fink

  • Screening for engineered neomycin riboswitches that control translation initiation

    Julia E. Weigand;Martin Sanchez;Ewald Bernd Gunnesch;Sabrina Zeiher

  • sRNA-Mediated Control of Transcription Termination in E. coli

    Nadezda Sedlyarova;Nadezda Sedlyarova;Ilya Shamovsky;Binod K. Bharati;Vitaly Epshtein

  • In vitro selection and characterization of streptomycin-binding RNAs: recognition discrimination between antibiotics.

    Scot T. Wallace;Renée Schroeder

  • Dissecting RNA chaperone activity.

    Lukas Rajkowitsch;Renée Schroeder

  • Non-competitive inhibition of group I intron RNA self-splicing by aminoglycoside antibiotics

    Uwe von Ahsen;Julian Davies;Renée Schroeder

  • The C-terminal domain of Escherichia coli Hfq is required for regulation

    Branislav Večerek;Lukas Rajkowitsch;Elisabeth Sonnleitner;Renée Schroeder

  • Assaying RNA chaperone activity in vivo using a novel RNA folding trap.

    Elisabeth Clodi;Katharina Semrad;Renée Schroeder

  • The double-stranded transcriptome of Escherichia coli

    Meghan Lybecker;Bob Zimmermann;Ivana Bilusic;Nadezda Tukhtubaeva

  • RNA chaperone StpA loosens interactions of the tertiary structure in the td group I intron in vivo

    Christina Waldsich;Rupert Grossberger;Renée Schroeder

  • RNA chaperone activity of large ribosomal subunit proteins from Escherichia coli.

    Katharina Semrad;Rachel Green;Renée Schroeder

  • Genomic SELEX for Hfq-binding RNAs identifies genomic aptamers predominantly in antisense transcripts

    C. Lorenz;T. Gesell;B. Zimmermann;U. Schoeberl

  • A ribosomal function is necessary for efficient splicing of the T4 phage thymidylate synthase intron in vivo.

    Katharina Semrad;Renée Schroeder

  • Monitoring Genomic Sequences during SELEX Using High-Throughput Sequencing: Neutral SELEX

    Bob Zimmermann;Tanja Gesell;Tanja Gesell;Doris Chen;Christina Lorenz

Frequent Co-Authors

Evgeny Nudler
Evgeny Nudler New York University
Andrea Barta
Andrea Barta Medical University of Vienna
Eric Westhof
Eric Westhof University of Strasbourg
Sovan Sarkar
Sovan Sarkar University of Birmingham
Susan L. Forsburg
Susan L. Forsburg University of Southern California
Peter Tompa
Peter Tompa Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Udo Bläsi
Udo Bläsi University of Vienna
Beatrix Suess
Beatrix Suess Technical University of Darmstadt
Susan Gottesman
Susan Gottesman National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Molecular Biology, diverse online degree options can pave the way to rewarding careers in healthcare, research, or academia. Many students start with a foundational science degree, but programs like capella vs wgu rn to bsn highlight how online nursing tracks—especially RN to BSN pathways—may complement molecular biology expertise and open doors to clinical research roles.

Advancing further, affordable graduate options are available, such as the programs listed in cheapest bsn to msn online. These bridge programs are particularly valuable for those seeking cost-effective ways to expand credentials and broaden their impact in the biomedical field.

Reputation also matters. Choosing from the non profit online universities ensures quality education and recognized accreditation—important factors for graduate school applications and employers alike.

Lastly, those in the armed forces can benefit from the flexible programs highlighted by online colleges for military. These institutions provide tailored support for military personnel seeking a career in molecular biology or a related STEM field.

Best Scientists Citing Renée Schroeder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles