World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
5755
World Ranking
10765
National Ranking
4489

Ned M. Smith publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ned M. Smith sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 353 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ned M. Smith D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ned M. Smith sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ned M. Smith is affiliated with Intel in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Computer Science and Engineering, with a focus on several specialized subfields and topics.

The scientist's recent publications cover areas related to blockchain networks, cybersecurity, and edge computing. Key papers include:

  • Towards an attestation architecture for blockchain networks (2021, World Wide Web)
  • An Attestation Architecture for Blockchain Networks (2020, arXiv (Cornell University))
  • Edge Computing Cybersecurity standards: protecting infrastructure and applications (2024, IEEE Access)

Ned M. Smith collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Thomas Hardjono
  • Dario Sabella
  • Kishen Maloor
  • Michaela Vanderveen
  • Akis Kourtis

Their publication venues reflect contributions to journals and archives known for computer science and engineering topics, such as:

  • World Wide Web
  • IEEE Access
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

The main fields of study for Ned M. Smith are:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering

Within these, the subfields of study include:

  • Information Systems
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Signal Processing

The research topics they focus on cover a broad range of contemporary computing and security issues, notably:

  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Information and Cyber Security
  • Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Smart Grid Security and Resilience
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques

Best Publications

  • Hardware-based device authentication

    Vincent Edward Von Bokern;Purushottam Goel;Sven Schrecker;Ned McArthur Smith

  • Cloud-Based Commissioning of Constrained Devices using Permissioned Blockchains

    Thomas Hardjono;Ned Smith

  • Providing Integrity Verification And Attestation In A Hidden Execution Environment

    Ned M. Smith;Vedvyas Shanbhogue;Arvind Kumar;Purushottam Goel

  • System and method for combining user and platform authentication in negotiated channel security protocols

    Ned M. Smith

  • Protected device management

    Ned M. Smith;Victoria C. Moore;Steven L. Grobman

  • Extensible pre-boot authentication

    Ned Smith;Vincent J. Zimmer

  • Originator authentication using platform attestation

    Ned McArthur Smith;Selim Aissi;Willard M. Wiseman

  • Methods and apparatus to perform secure boot

    Ned Smith

  • Methods and apparatus to identify privacy relevant correlations between data values

    Ned M Smith;Nathan Heldt-Sheller

  • Virtual TPM key migration using hardware keys

    Ned M. Smith;Willard M. Wiseman;Alok Kumar;Tasneem Brutch

  • Methods And Apparatus For Creating An Isolated Partition For A Virtual Trusted Platform Module

    Ned M. Smith;Willard M. (Monty) Wiseman;Faraz A. Siddiqi;Tasneem Brutch

  • Authentication and Access Protection of Computer Boot Modules in Run-Time Environments

    Ned Smith

  • Multi-authentication for a computing device connecting to a network

    Selim Aissi;David Wheeler;Krishnamurthy Srinivasan;Randy E Hall

  • Virtual TPM keys rooted in a hardware TPM

    Tasneem Brutch;Alok Kumar;Vincent Scarlata;Faraz A. Siddiqi

  • Systems and methods for distributed trust computing and key management

    Ned M. Smith

  • Technologies for secure storage and use of biometric authentication information

    Ned M. Smith;Conor P. Cahill;Micah J. Sheller;Jason Martin

  • Privacy enhanced key management for a web service provider using a converged security engine

    Ned M. Smith;Conor P. Cahill;Victoria C. Moore;Jason Martin

  • Providing access to encrypted data

    Ned M. Smith;George W. Cox;David Johnston

  • Technologies for enhanced user authentication using advanced sensor monitoring

    Jasmeet Chhabra;Ned M. Smith;Micah J. Sheller;Nathan Heldt-Sheller

  • Using a proxy for endpoint access control

    Ned Smith;Rajan Palanivel;Carl Klotz

Frequent Co-Authors

Vincent J. Zimmer
Vincent J. Zimmer Intel (United States)
Selim Aissi
Selim Aissi ICE Mortgage Technology
Glen J. Anderson
Glen J. Anderson Intel (United States)
David M. Durham
David M. Durham Intel (United States)
Jessica Fridrich
Jessica Fridrich Binghamton University
Ravi Iyer
Ravi Iyer Intel (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Computer Science online opens up many flexible options. Today, there are affordable online courses from recognized colleges across the USA, making it possible to get a quality education without breaking the bank.

Worried about your academic history? Many online colleges that accept low GPA provide a second chance for students to pursue their ambitions. They offer supportive pathways to both undergraduate and graduate degrees.

Computer Science graduates enjoy strong career prospects, but related fields are also worth exploring. For example, there are high-paying jobs with environmental science degree, including roles in data analysis, environmental technology, and research.

For those eager to fast-track their careers, consider a 1 year computer science degree online. Accelerated programs can help you enter the tech workforce rapidly, often with flexible class schedules for busy adults.

Best Scientists Citing Ned M. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles