World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
7239
World Ranking
8410
National Ranking
3602

Ravi Iyer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ravi Iyer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 154 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ravi Iyer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ravi Iyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to computer architecture and cache/memory systems
  • 2005 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2001 - ACM Fellow For outstanding contributions to the design, measurement and evaluation of reliable computing systems.

Overview

Ravi Iyer is affiliated with Intel in the United States, contributing to areas at the intersection of computer science and engineering. Their research spans several interconnected fields, emphasizing computational theory, mathematics, and electrical and electronic engineering.

Their academic work focuses extensively on graph theory and its applications, with particular attention to advanced graph theory research and graph labeling and dimension problems. Other notable research topics include graph theory and CDMA systems, limits and structures in graph theory, interconnection networks and systems, and biological computing related to DNA.

Ravi Iyer has published papers in multiple venues, reflecting a diverse engagement with the academic community. These venues include:

  • 2022 Second International Conference on Computer Science, Engineering and Applications (ICCSEA)
  • Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography
  • Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems
  • Discrete Applied Mathematics

The scientist's recent papers illustrate a pattern of research focused on irregular colorings and chromatic numbers within graph theory contexts:

  • "Irregular coloring of Join of two graphs and Platonic graphs," 2022, published in the 2022 Second International Conference on Computer Science, Engineering and Applications (ICCSEA)
  • "Irregular colorings of certain classes of corona product and Sierpiński graphs," 2022, published in the Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography
  • "Irregular chromatic number for hypercube graph and its variants," 2023, published in the Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems
  • "Unraveling the enigmatic irregular coloring of Honeycomb Networks," 2024, published in Discrete Applied Mathematics

Collaborative efforts are noted with coauthors including S. Shyama and K. Somamsundaram, with multiple joint publications particularly with S. Shyama.

Ravi Iyer's research contributions have been recognized through several awards. They were named an IEEE Fellow in 2015 for work related to computer architecture and cache/memory systems. Moreover, they were made a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2005. Earlier, in 2001, they became an ACM Fellow for contributions to the design, measurement, and evaluation of reliable computing systems.

Best Publications

  • CQoS: a framework for enabling QoS in shared caches of CMP platforms

    Ravi Iyer

  • Neural cache: bit-serial in-cache acceleration of deep neural networks

    Charles Eckert;Xiaowei Wang;Jingcheng Wang;Arun Subramaniyan

  • OWL: cooperative thread array aware scheduling techniques for improving GPGPU performance

    Adwait Jog;Onur Kayiran;Nachiappan Chidambaram Nachiappan;Asit K. Mishra

  • Cache revive: architecting volatile STT-RAM caches for enhanced performance in CMPs

    Adwait Jog;Asit K. Mishra;Cong Xu;Yuan Xie

  • QoS policies and architecture for cache/memory in CMP platforms

    Ravi Iyer;Li Zhao;Fei Guo;Ramesh Illikkal

  • TCP onloading for data center servers

    G. Regnier;S. Makineni;I. Illikkal;R. Iyer

  • Communist, utilitarian, and capitalist cache policies on CMPs: caches as a shared resource

    Lisa R. Hsu;Steven K. Reinhardt;Ravishankar Iyer;Srihari Makineni

  • Orchestrated scheduling and prefetching for GPGPUs

    Adwait Jog;Onur Kayiran;Asit K. Mishra;Mahmut T. Kandemir

  • Direct Cache Access for High Bandwidth Network I/O

    Ram Huggahalli;Ravi Iyer;Scott Tetrick

  • Modeling virtual machine performance: challenges and approaches

    Omesh Tickoo;Ravi Iyer;Ramesh Illikkal;Don Newell

  • Cache QoS: From concept to reality in the Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2600 v3 product family

    Andrew Herdrich;Edwin Verplanke;Priya Autee;Ramesh Illikkal

  • A Framework for Providing Quality of Service in Chip Multi-Processors

    Fei Guo;Yan Solihin;Li Zhao;Ravishankar Iyer

  • A case for dynamic frequency tuning in on-chip networks

    Asit K. Mishra;Reetuparna Das;Soumya Eachempati;Ravi Iyer

  • CoQoS: Coordinating QoS-aware shared resources in NoC-based SoCs

    Bin Li;Li Zhao;Ravi Iyer;Li-Shiuan Peh

  • Exploring DRAM cache architectures for CMP server platforms

    Li Zhao;R. Iyer;R. Illikkal;D. Newell

  • Characterization & analysis of a server consolidation benchmark

    Padma Apparao;Ravi Iyer;Xiaomin Zhang;Don Newell

  • Performance and power optimization through data compression in Network-on-Chip architectures

    R. Das;A.K. Mishra;C. Nicopoulos;Dongkook Park

  • CacheScouts: Fine-Grain Monitoring of Shared Caches in CMP Platforms

    Li Zhao;R. Iyer;R. Illikkal;J. Moses

  • VM3: Measuring, modeling and managing VM shared resources

    Ravi Iyer;Ramesh Illikkal;Omesh Tickoo;Li Zhao

  • QuickIA: Exploring heterogeneous architectures on real prototypes

    Nagabhushan Chitlur;Ganapati Srinivasa;Scott Hahn;P K Gupta

  • Neural Cache: Bit-Serial In-Cache Acceleration of Deep Neural Networks

    Charles Eckert;Xiaowei Wang;Jingcheng Wang;Arun Subramaniyan

Frequent Co-Authors

Laxmi N. Bhuyan
Laxmi N. Bhuyan University of California, Riverside
Donald Newell
Donald Newell Intel (United States)
Reetuparna Das
Reetuparna Das University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Chita R. Das
Chita R. Das Pennsylvania State University
Yan Solihin
Yan Solihin University of Central Florida
Asit K. Mishra
Asit K. Mishra University College Cork
Mahmut Kandemir
Mahmut Kandemir Pennsylvania State University
Dennis Sylvester
Dennis Sylvester University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
N. Vijaykrishnan
N. Vijaykrishnan Pennsylvania State University
Jiang Xu
Jiang Xu Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education opens up diverse opportunities in Computer Science, whether you’re just starting or looking to advance your career. Many students choose 2 year online degrees to quickly gain foundational skills or switch careers with minimal commitment. These programs can be a strong stepping stone toward more advanced studies or immediate entry-level jobs in tech.

Students seeking affordability have access to some of the cheapest online degrees, which ensure quality education without significant financial strain. If academic history is a concern, there are online colleges that accept 2.0 gpa, making Computer Science more accessible to a wider range of learners.

For those aiming to accelerate their careers, pursuing masters degrees that are worth it can provide specialized knowledge and boost employability in competitive tech fields. Ultimately, the flexible pathways available today make it easier than ever to find an online Computer Science degree that matches your goals and background.

Best Scientists Citing Ravi Iyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles