World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Natalie Enright Jerger

Natalie Enright Jerger

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
5798
World Ranking
12984
National Ranking
498

Natalie Enright Jerger publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natalie Enright Jerger sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 85 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Natalie Enright Jerger D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natalie Enright Jerger sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - ACM Distinguished Member
  • 2015 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • 2014 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Natalie Enright Jerger is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their research is situated primarily within the field of Computer Science, focusing on specific subfields such as Computer Networks and Communications, Hardware and Architecture, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Information Systems, and Artificial Intelligence.

Their recent publications span a variety of venues and topics, reflecting an emphasis on parallel computing, interconnection networks, and hardware design. Notable papers include:

  • Exploiting Errors for Efficiency, 2020, ACM Computing Surveys
  • Interconnects for DNA, Quantum, In-Memory, and Optical Computing: Insights From a Panel Discussion, 2022, IEEE Micro
  • SEEC: stochastic escape express channel, 2021, IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing, Data, and Analytics
  • BlackJack: Secure machine learning on IoT devices through hardware-based shuffling, 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Masthead, 2020, IEEE Micro

The research topics covered by Natalie Enright Jerger include:

  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Interconnection Networks and Systems
  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
  • Radiation Effects in Electronics
  • Low-power high-performance VLSI design
  • Quantum-Dot Cellular Automata

Frequent co-authors in their work consist of:

  • Jiechen Zhao
  • Thomas Anderson
  • Ran Shu
  • Katie Lim
  • Zewen Fan

Natalie Enright Jerger's publications appear regularly in several scientific venues, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Micro
  • ACM Computing Surveys
  • IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing, Data, and Analytics
  • Communications of the ACM

The scientist has been recognized with various distinctions over the years, including:

  • ACM Distinguished Member (2018)
  • Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (2015)
  • ACM Senior Member (2014)

Best Publications

  • Outstanding Research Problems in NoC Design: System, Microarchitecture, and Circuit Perspectives

    R. Marculescu;U.Y. Ogras;Li-Shiuan Peh;N.E. Jerger

  • Cnvlutin: ineffectual-neuron-free deep neural network computing

    Jorge Albericio;Patrick Judd;Tayler Hetherington;Tor Aamodt

  • Virtual Circuit Tree Multicasting: A Case for On-Chip Hardware Multicast Support

    Natalie Enright Jerger;Li-Shiuan Peh;Mikko Lipasti

  • DBAR: an efficient routing algorithm to support multiple concurrent applications in networks-on-chip

    Sheng Ma;Natalie Enright Jerger;Zhiying Wang

  • Load Value Approximation

    Joshua San Miguel;Mario Badr;Natalie Enright Jerger

  • Achieving predictable performance through better memory controller placement in many-core CMPs

    Dennis Abts;Natalie D. Enright Jerger;John Kim;Dan Gibson

  • SCARAB: a single cycle adaptive routing and bufferless network

    Mitchell Hayenga;Natalie Enright Jerger;Mikko Lipasti

  • Circuit-Switched Coherence

    N. Enright Jerger;Li-Shiuan Peh;M. Lipasti

  • Enabling interposer-based disintegration of multi-core processors

    Ajaykumar Kannan;Natalie Enright Jerger;Gabriel H. Loh

  • On-Chip Networks

    Li-Shiuan Peh;Natalie Enright Jerger

  • Doppelgänger: a cache for approximate computing

    Joshua San Miguel;Jorge Albericio;Andreas Moshovos;Natalie Enright Jerger

  • SynFull: synthetic traffic models capturing cache coherent behaviour

    Mario Badr;Natalie Enright Jerger

  • Modular routing design for chiplet-based systems

    Jieming Yin;Zhifeng Lin;Onur Kayiran;Matthew Poremba

  • Reduced-Precision Strategies for Bounded Memory in Deep Neural Nets

    Patrick Judd;Jorge Albericio;Tayler H. Hetherington;Tor M. Aamodt

  • Virtual tree coherence: Leveraging regions and in-network multicast trees for scalable cache coherence

    N.D. Enright Jerger;Li-Shiuan Peh;M.H. Lipasti

  • Whole packet forwarding: Efficient design of fully adaptive routing algorithms for networks-on-chip

    Sheng Ma;Natalie Enright Jerger;Zhiying Wang

  • NoC Architectures for Silicon Interposer Systems: Why Pay for more Wires when you Can Get them (from your interposer) for Free?

    Natalie Enright Jerger;Ajaykumar Kannan;Zimo Li;Gabriel H. Loh

  • Proteus: Exploiting Numerical Precision Variability in Deep Neural Networks

    Patrick Judd;Jorge Albericio;Tayler Hetherington;Tor M. Aamodt

  • DART: A Programmable Architecture for NoC Simulation on FPGAs

    Danyao Wang;Charles Lo;Jasmina Vasiljevic;Natalie Enright Jerger

  • DART: a programmable architecture for NoC simulation on FPGAs

    Danyao Wang;Natalie Enright Jerger;J. Gregory Steffan

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas Moshovos
Andreas Moshovos University of Toronto
Tor M. Aamodt
Tor M. Aamodt University of British Columbia
Gabriel H. Loh
Gabriel H. Loh Advanced Micro Devices (United States)
Mikko H. Lipasti
Mikko H. Lipasti University of Wisconsin–Madison
Li-Shiuan Peh
Li-Shiuan Peh National University of Singapore
Tushar Krishna
Tushar Krishna Georgia Institute of Technology
Babak Falsafi
Babak Falsafi École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Jason H. Anderson
Jason H. Anderson University of Toronto
Andreas Gerstlauer
Andreas Gerstlauer The University of Texas at Austin
Raquel Urtasun
Raquel Urtasun University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of Computer Science offers a wide range of flexible learning and career opportunities, particularly through online study options. Many students begin their journey with associates degrees online. These programs can provide foundational knowledge and are a great entry point for tech careers or further study.

Cost is often a major concern when pursuing higher education. Fortunately, there are numerous most affordable online colleges that deliver quality education without breaking the bank. These schools can make computer science degrees more accessible for a broader range of students.

For those worried about past academic performance, various online schools that accept low gpa offer a chance to pursue a technology degree without stringent GPA requirements. This helps open the door for motivated learners from all backgrounds.

Graduates often wonder about career options following their degree. For inspiration, you can look at jobs with elementary education and environmental science degree to better understand how interdisciplinary pathways expand possibilities across sectors, including tech-focused roles in sustainability and education.

Best Scientists Citing Natalie Enright Jerger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles