World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 36 11143 10826 4622 4425 91 6412

Lingjia Tang publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lingjia Tang between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lingjia Tang published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2016. 11 of the 103 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2016. 2007: 2 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 6 publications
2007 2025

103 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lingjia Tang: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 2
2008 0
2009 0
2010 0
2011 6
2012 3
2013 8
2014 4
2015 11
2016 12
2017 11
2018 12
2019 7
2020 6
2021 2
2022 2
2023 6
2024 5
2025 6
Total 103
Download as CSV

Lingjia Tang publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lingjia Tang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 82–91 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 91 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324 91
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Lingjia Tang D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lingjia Tang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990 36
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Lingjia Tang is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research contributions lie primarily within the field of computer science, with a significant focus on subfields such as artificial intelligence, information systems, computer networks and communications, information systems and management, and computer vision and pattern recognition.

Their scholarly output includes a range of topics, notably:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Lingjia Tang has contributed to various research venues, frequently publishing in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Computer Architecture Letters
  • Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Lingjia Tang include:

  • "Towards Personalized Intelligence at Scale," 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "The Jaseci Programming Paradigm and Runtime Stack: Building Scale-Out Production Applications Easy and Fast," 2023, IEEE Computer Architecture Letters
  • "Scaling Down to Scale Up: A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Replacing OpenAI's LLM with Open Source SLMs in Production," 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "One Agent Too Many: User Perspectives on Approaches to Multi-agent Conversational AI," 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "A Benchmarking Framework for Interactive 3D Applications in the Cloud," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent collaborators of Lingjia Tang include:

  • Jason Mars
  • Yiping Kang
  • Krisztián Flautner
  • Christopher Clarke
  • Ashish Mahendra

Best Publications

  • Bubble-Up: increasing utilization in modern warehouse scale computers via sensible co-locations

    Jason Mars;Lingjia Tang;Robert Hundt;Kevin Skadron

  • Neurosurgeon: Collaborative Intelligence Between the Cloud and Mobile Edge

    Yiping Kang;Johann Hauswald;Cao Gao;Austin Rovinski

  • Bubble-flux: precise online QoS management for increased utilization in warehouse scale computers

    Hailong Yang;Alex Breslow;Jason Mars;Lingjia Tang

  • The Architectural Implications of Autonomous Driving: Constraints and Acceleration

    Shih-Chieh Lin;Yunqi Zhang;Chang-Hong Hsu;Matt Skach

  • An Evaluation Dataset for Intent Classification and Out-of-Scope Prediction

    Stefan Larson;Anish Mahendran;Joseph J. Peper;Christopher Clarke

  • Sirius: An Open End-to-End Voice and Vision Personal Assistant and Its Implications for Future Warehouse Scale Computers

    Johann Hauswald;Michael A. Laurenzano;Yunqi Zhang;Cheng Li

  • The impact of memory subsystem resource sharing on datacenter applications

    Lingjia Tang;Jason Mars;Neil Vachharajani;Robert Hundt

  • DjiNN and Tonic: DNN as a service and its implications for future warehouse scale computers

    Johann Hauswald;Yiping Kang;Michael A. Laurenzano;Quan Chen

  • Whare-map: heterogeneity in "homogeneous" warehouse-scale computers

    Jason Mars;Lingjia Tang

  • SMiTe: Precise QoS Prediction on Real-System SMT Processors to Improve Utilization in Warehouse Scale Computers

    Yunqi Zhang;Michael A. Laurenzano;Jason Mars;Lingjia Tang

  • Gist: efficient data encoding for deep neural network training

    Animesh Jain;Amar Phanishayee;Jason Mars;Lingjia Tang

  • GrandSLAm: Guaranteeing SLAs for Jobs in Microservices Execution Frameworks

    Ram Srivatsa Kannan;Lavanya Subramanian;Ashwin Raju;Jeongseob Ahn

  • Prophet: Precise QoS Prediction on Non-Preemptive Accelerators to Improve Utilization in Warehouse-Scale Computers

    Quan Chen;Hailong Yang;Minyi Guo;Ram Srivatsa Kannan

  • Adrenaline: Pinpointing and reining in tail queries with quick voltage boosting

    Chang-Hong Hsu;Yunqi Zhang;Michael A. Laurenzano;David Meisner

  • Baymax: QoS Awareness and Increased Utilization for Non-Preemptive Accelerators in Warehouse Scale Computers

    Quan Chen;Hailong Yang;Jason Mars;Lingjia Tang

  • Heterogeneity in “Homogeneous” Warehouse-Scale Computers: A Performance Opportunity

    J. Mars;Lingjia Tang;R. Hundt

  • Octopus-Man: QoS-driven task management for heterogeneous multicores in warehouse-scale computers

    Vinicius Petrucci;Michael A. Laurenzano;John Doherty;Yunqi Zhang

  • Compiling for niceness: mitigating contention for QoS in warehouse scale computers

    Lingjia Tang;Jason Mars;Mary Lou Soffa

  • Directly characterizing cross core interference through contention synthesis

    Jason Mars;Lingjia Tang;Mary Lou Soffa

  • Treadmill: attributing the source of tail latency through precise load testing and statistical inference

    Yunqi Zhang;David Meisner;Jason Mars;Lingjia Tang

  • Proceedings of the 2017 International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization

    Vijay Janapa Reddi;Aaron Smith;Lingjia Tang

Frequent Co-Authors

Jason Mars
Jason Mars University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mary Lou Soffa
Mary Lou Soffa University of Virginia
Ronald G. Dreslinski
Ronald G. Dreslinski University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Trevor Mudge
Trevor Mudge University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Scott Mahlke
Scott Mahlke University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Dean M. Tullsen
Dean M. Tullsen University of California, San Diego
Thomas F. Wenisch
Thomas F. Wenisch University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Kevin Skadron
Kevin Skadron University of Virginia
Martin Schulz
Martin Schulz Technical University of Munich
Danny H. K. Tsang
Danny H. K. Tsang Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Computer Science degree in the USA opens many doors, but there are also alternative and accelerated pathways to launch or advance your tech career. Many students pursue easy certifications to get as a way to quickly show practical skills and boost their employability in fields like IT support, cloud computing, or cybersecurity.

Looking for a shorter timeline? Check out 1 year associate degree programs online, which can jumpstart your career fast—sometimes in less than 12 months—especially in roles like web development, networking, or computer programming.

If you have a bachelor’s already, you can advance with a graduate degree. Some of the quickest cheapest masters degree options online allow you to gain marketable expertise at a reduced cost and timeframe.

Finally, consider programs ranked among the most useful graduate degrees for tech and in-demand sectors, which often lead to higher-paying and more stable jobs.

Best Scientists Citing Lingjia Tang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles