World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
7157
World Ranking
8028
National Ranking
3450

David M. Durham publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Durham sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 226 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

David M. Durham D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Durham sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

David M. Durham is affiliated with Intel in the United States and has contributed to the field of computer science with a focus on cryptographic implementations and security. Their research covers a range of topics within computer science, including artificial intelligence and signal processing.

The scientist's work specifically addresses themes such as:

  • Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Cryptography and Data Security
  • Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
  • Security and Verification in Computing
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques

Durham has published research across several journals and venues, including:

  • Computer Communications
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Cystic Fibrosis

Some of the notable papers by this scientist are:

  • "Security definitions, entropy measures and constructions for implicitly detecting data corruption" (2020) in Computer Communications
  • "EC-CFI: Control-Flow Integrity via Code Encryption Counteracting Fault Attacks" (2023) in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "681 Collecting and addressing social determinants of health information in an adult cystic fibrosis clinic through quality improvement" (2023) in Journal of Cystic Fibrosis

Frequent collaborators include several researchers with whom Durham has coauthored publications, such as:

  • Michael E. Kounavis
  • Sergej Deutsch
  • Ken Grewal
  • Pascal Nasahl
  • Salmin Sultana

Their main field of study is computer science, with the majority of their work focusing on artificial intelligence. A smaller portion of their research also involves signal processing.

Best Publications

  • The COPS (Common Open Policy Service) Protocol

    J. Boyle;R. Cohen;S. Herzog;R. Rajan

  • COPS Usage for Policy Provisioning (COPS-PR)

    K. Chan;J. Seligson;D. Durham;S. Gai

  • Techniques for self-isolation of networked devices

    David M. Durham;Ravi Sahita;Priya Rajagopal;James Kardach

  • COPS usage for RSVP

    J. Boyle;R. Cohen;D. Durham;R. Rajan

  • Distributing policy information in a communication network

    Russell J. Fenger;David M. Durham

  • Grouping targets of management policies

    Hugh F Mahon;David M Durham;Puqi Tang

  • Method and apparatus for high accuracy distributed time synchronization using processor tick counters

    Priya Rajagopal;David M. Durham

  • Providing protected access to critical memory regions

    Uday Savagaonkar;Travis T. Schluessler;Hormuzd Khosravi;Ravi Sahita

  • Prevention of denial of service attacks

    Priya Govindarajan;David M. Durham

  • Hierarchical Trust Based Posture Reporting and Policy Enforcement

    Hormuzd Khosravi;David Durham;Karanvir Grewal

  • Method and apparatus to provide secure application execution

    Francis X. McKeen;Carlos V. Rozas;Uday R. Savagaonkar;Simon P. Johnson

  • Identifying network management policies

    Pankaj N. Parmar;David M. Durham

  • Secure vault service for software components within an execution environment

    David M. Durham;Hormuzd M. Khosravi;Uri Blumenthal;Men Long

  • A hypervisor-based system for protecting software runtime memory and persistent storage

    Prashant Dewan;David Durham;Hormuzd Khosravi;Men Long

  • System and method for managing actions provided by a network using a policy tree

    David M. Durham;Russell J. Fenger;Rajendra S. Yavatkar

  • Low latency virtual machine page table management

    Ravi L. Sahita;David M. Durham;Gilbert Neiger;Andrew V. Anderson

  • Method and apparatus for run-time in-memory patching of code from a service processor

    David M. Durham;Travis Schluessler;Uday R. Savagaonkar;Hormuzd M. Khosravi

  • Providing policy information to a remote device

    Rajendra S. Yavatkar;David M. Durham;Russell J. Fenger

  • SWITCHING BETWEEN MULTIPLE OPERATING SYSTEMS (OSes) USING SLEEP STATE MANAGEMENT AND SEQUESTERED RE-BASEABLE MEMORY

    David Durham

  • Intra-partitioning of software components within an execution environment

    David Durham;Hormuzd Khosravi;Ravi Sahita;Uday Savagaonkar

Frequent Co-Authors

Gilbert Neiger
Gilbert Neiger Intel (United States)
Vincent J. Zimmer
Vincent J. Zimmer Intel (United States)
Richard Uhlig
Richard Uhlig Intel (United States)
Ned M. Smith
Ned M. Smith Intel (United States)
James P. Kardach
James P. Kardach FINsix Corporation
Shay Gueron
Shay Gueron University of Haifa
Keith McCloghrie
Keith McCloghrie Cisco Systems (United States)
Ruby B. Lee
Ruby B. Lee Princeton University
Ravi Rajwar
Ravi Rajwar Google (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens diverse career opportunities, both within tech and across interdisciplinary fields. For students interested in technology’s impact on our world, exploring jobs for environmental science majors can reveal how computing and data analysis are driving sustainability solutions.

Many learners seek flexible study options. Accelerated programs, like those featured in the accelerated computer science degree guide, enable you to earn your degree faster without compromising quality. These programs often fit the needs of working professionals or those wanting a quicker entry into the workforce.

If you’re interested in engineering, consider closely related fields you can study online. The online environmental engineering degree and the cheapest mechanical engineering degree online are two attractive and affordable options. Both programs offer strong job prospects in rapidly evolving industries.

By researching these alternative online pathways, students can tailor their educational journey to suit their career aspirations and lifestyle, while benefiting from the flexibility of online learning.

Best Scientists Citing David M. Durham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles