World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Animal Science and Veterinary 39 1242 364 489 7955

R. H. Harms publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by R. H. Harms between 1955 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. R. H. Harms published across 70 years, from 1955 to 2024, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 1983. 3 of the 495 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1955 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 1983. 1955: 1 publication 1956: 3 publications 1957: 5 publications 1958: 4 publications 1959: 1 publication 1960: 4 publications 1961: 7 publications 1962: 10 publications 1963: 12 publications 1964: 11 publications 1965: 16 publications 1966: 9 publications 1967: 15 publications 1968: 14 publications 1969: 12 publications 1970: 10 publications 1971: 17 publications 1972: 24 publications 1973: 19 publications 1974: 12 publications 1975: 13 publications 1976: 17 publications 1977: 16 publications 1978: 11 publications 1979: 12 publications 1980: 14 publications 1981: 6 publications 1982: 18 publications 1983: 25 publications 1984: 13 publications 1985: 12 publications 1986: 11 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 12 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 3 publications
1955 2024

495 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
R. H. Harms: publications per year, 1955 to 2024
Year Publications
1955 1
1956 3
1957 5
1958 4
1959 1
1960 4
1961 7
1962 10
1963 12
1964 11
1965 16
1966 9
1967 15
1968 14
1969 12
1970 10
1971 17
1972 24
1973 19
1974 12
1975 13
1976 17
1977 16
1978 11
1979 12
1980 14
1981 6
1982 18
1983 25
1984 13
1985 12
1986 11
1987 6
1988 8
1989 6
1990 12
1991 7
1992 10
1993 8
1994 6
1995 9
1996 5
1997 3
1998 8
1999 9
2000 7
2001 2
2002 5
2003 3
2004 4
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 0
2009 0
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 3
Total 495
Download as CSV

R. H. Harms publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. H. Harms sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 84 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 29–33 to 442+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 109. Most scientists, 109, have 119–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 442+ publications, is where this scientist sits. 29–33 publications: 1 scientist 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29–33 publications 442+

This scientist: 489 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
29–33 1
34–38 6
39–43 17
44–48 23
49–53 28
54–58 44
59–63 66
64–68 75
69–73 71
74–78 85
79–83 108
84–88 105
89–93 84
94–98 103
99–103 97
104–108 95
109–113 89
114–118 88
119–123 109
124–128 93
129–133 89
134–138 95
139–143 92
144–148 80
149–153 75
154–158 74
159–163 67
164–168 53
169–173 62
174–178 63
179–183 50
184–188 55
189–193 50
194–198 27
199–203 44
204–208 31
209–213 28
214–218 38
219–223 33
224–228 36
229–233 29
234–238 35
239–243 23
244–248 24
249–253 29
254–258 28
259–263 21
264–268 25
269–273 11
274–278 18
279–283 13
284–288 18
289–293 10
294–298 12
299–303 11
304–308 15
309–313 14
314–318 14
319–323 8
324–328 8
329–333 13
334–338 14
339–343 13
344–348 10
349–353 11
354–358 5
359–363 8
364–368 8
369–373 6
374–378 7
379–383 8
384–388 3
389–393 4
394–398 5
399–403 8
404–408 5
409–413 4
414–418 3
419–423 8
424–428 5
429–433 3
434–438 5
439–441 5
442+ 99 489
Download as CSV

R. H. Harms D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. H. Harms sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 77+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 158. Most scientists, 158, have 31 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 5
21 22
22 31
23 44
24 53
25 66
26 80
27 101
28 106
29 116
30 154
31 158
32 143
33 137
34 126
35 134
36 112
37 115
38 105
39 111 39
40 107
41 87
42 74
43 62
44 61
45 41
46 51
47 43
48 28
49 47
50 40
51 34
52 33
53 43
54 16
55 32
56 21
57 18
58 28
59 33
60 17
61 21
62 18
63 21
64 9
65 20
66 11
67 16
68 12
69 17
70 13
71 15
72 11
73 11
74 14
75 5
76 6
77+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

R. H. Harms was affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research primarily focused on Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a particular emphasis on several subfields including Safety Research, Social Psychology, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, and Agronomy and Crop Science.

Their work covered main research topics such as Youth Development and Social Support, Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports, Diverse Educational Innovations Studies, and Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology.

R. H. Harms authored multiple papers, notably contributing to the Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety. Two recent publications from 2024 are:

  • Social Acceptance Scale-development of an instrument for the differentiated measurement of social acceptance in agricultural livestock farming, 2024, Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety
  • Einflussfaktoren auf die gesellschaftliche Wahrnehmung und Akzeptanz der landwirtschaftlichen Nutztierhaltung aus Sicht des Lebensmitteleinzelhandels, 2024, Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety

Collaboration was a part of their research activities, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Nadine R. Gier-Reinartz
  • Nadine R. Gier-Reinartz
  • Peter Kenning

Their publications were predominantly featured in the Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, where they had at least two papers published.

Best Publications

  • Performance of Four Strains of Commercial Layers With Major Changes in Dietary Energy

    R. H. Harms;G. B. Russell;D. R. Sloan

  • VARIOUS METHODS OF MEASURING SHELL QUALITY IN RELATION TO PERCENTAGE OF CRACKED EGGS

    Abdou G. Abdallah;R. H. Harms;O. El-Husseiny

  • Effect of Wet Litter and Supplemental Biotin and/or Whey on the Production of Foot Pad Dermatitis in Broilers

    R. H. Harms;B. L. Damron;C. F. Simpson

  • Breaking strength of chick bones as an indication of dietary calcium and phosphorus adequacy.

    L. O. Rowland;R. H. Harms;H. R. Wilson;I. J. Ross

  • Susceptibility of various poultry species to dietary aflatoxin.

    A S Arafa;R J Bloomer;H R Wilson;C F Simpson

  • Interrelationship of Lactobacillus and Zinc Bacitracin in the Diets of Turkey Poults

    C. Francis;D. M. Janky;A. S. Arafa;R. H. Harms

  • Biological Assay of Inorganic Manganese for Chicks

    L. T. Watson;C. B. Ammerman;Sarah M. Miller;R. H. Harms

  • Response of Broiler Breeder Females to Feed Restriction Below Recommended Levels. 1. Growth and Reproductive Performance

    T. R. Fattori;H. R. Wilson;R. H. Harms;R. D. Miles

  • The Influence of Dietary Phosphorus Level on Laying Hen Performance, Egg Shell Quality, and Various Blood Parameters

    R. D. Miles;P. T. Costa;R. H. Harms

  • Performance of Broiler Breeders as Affected by Body Weight During the Breeding Season

    H. R. Wilson;R. H. Harms

  • The Ability of Hens to Maintain Calcium Deposition in the Egg Shell and Egg Yolk as the Hen Ages

    D. A. Roland;D. R. Sloan;R. H. Harms

  • Effects of a Living Nonfreeze-Dried Lactobacillus acidophilus Culture on Performance, Egg Quality, and Gut Microflora in Commercial Layers,

    R. D. Miles;A. S. Arafa;R. H. Harms;C. W. Carlson

  • Virginiamycin and Broiler Performance

    R. D. Miles;D. M. Janky;R. H. Harms

  • Effects of excess dietary iodine upon pullets and laying hens.

    L. R. Arrington;R. A. Santa Cruz;R. H. Harms;H. R. Wilson

  • Research Note: Effect of Age on the Yolk to Albumen Ratio in Chicken Eggs

    S. M. Hussein;R. H. Harms;D. M. Janky

  • A Method for Estimating Shell Weight and Correcting Specific Gravity for Egg Weight in Eggshell Quality Studies

    R. H. Harms;A. F. Rossi;D. R. Sloan;R. D. Miles

  • The Relationship of Phosphorus, Calcium, and Vitamin D3 in the Diet of Broiler-Type Chicks

    P. W. Waldroup;C. B. Ammerman;R. H. Harms

  • Evaluation of Nutrient Specifications for Broiler Breeders

    H. R. Wilson;R. H. Harms

  • Daily Feed Intake and Performance of Laying Hens Grouped According to Their Body Weight

    R. H. Harms;P. T. Costa;R. D. Miles

  • A Comparison of Bone Strength of Caged and Floor Layers and Roosters

    L. O. Rowland;H. R. Wilson;Jack L. Fey;R. H. Harms

  • Influence of Various Dietary Factors on Bone Fragility of Caged Layers

    L. O. Rowland;R. H. Harms;H. R. Wilson;E. M. Ahmed

  • Performance of Commercial Layers When Fed Diets with Four Levels of Corn Oil or Poultry Fat

    C. R. Bohnsack;R. H. Harms;W. D. Merkel;G. B. Russell

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard D. Miles
Richard D. Miles University of Florida
C. B. Ammerman
C. B. Ammerman University of Florida
C.J. Wilcox
C.J. Wilcox University of Florida
David R. Ledoux
David R. Ledoux University of Missouri

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Animal Science and Veterinary studies, expanding skills in related fields can open diverse career pathways. Professionals with knowledge in psychology and counseling can effectively contribute to animal welfare and client communication. Pursuing nasp accredited programs offers reputable credentials for those interested in educational and behavioral applications within animal care contexts.

Those aiming to enhance their expertise in mental health support may consider advanced degrees like online apa accredited psyd programs, which provide training for clinical psychologists working with both humans and animals in therapeutic settings. Additionally, addiction counseling degree online courses equip professionals to address substance abuse challenges that can indirectly affect animal care providers and pet owners.

For those interested in family dynamics and counseling, enrolling in online marriage and family therapy masters programs offers valuable insights into improving relationships, stress management, and emotional support—all crucial for holistic veterinary practice.

Best Scientists Citing R. H. Harms

Recently Published Articles