World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Per Tunestål

Per Tunestål

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 52 3697 3543 29 28 253 8586

Per Tunestål publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Per Tunestål between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Per Tunestål published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 8.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2010. 7 of the 259 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2010. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 3 publications
1997 2025

259 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Per Tunestål: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 0
1999 1
2000 0
2001 7
2002 3
2003 6
2004 12
2005 5
2006 7
2007 14
2008 15
2009 19
2010 20
2011 8
2012 15
2013 8
2014 7
2015 7
2016 15
2017 20
2018 18
2019 18
2020 10
2021 9
2022 2
2023 5
2024 4
2025 3
Total 259
Download as CSV

Per Tunestål publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Per Tunestål sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 248–257 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 253 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280 253
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Per Tunestål D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Per Tunestål sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213 52
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Per Tunestål is affiliated with Lund University in Sweden and works primarily in the fields of Engineering and Chemical Engineering. Their research focus encompasses several subfields, including Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Computational Mechanics, Automotive Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, and Control and Systems Engineering.

The scientist's research interests cover diverse topics primarily related to combustion and energy systems. Key topics associated with their work include:

  • Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
  • Combustion and flame dynamics
  • Biodiesel Production and Applications
  • Vehicle emissions and performance
  • Combustion and Detonation Processes
  • Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Chaos control and synchronization

Per Tunestål has contributed to a variety of publication venues, with the most frequent being the SAE Technical Papers on CD-ROM/SAE Technical Paper Series. Other common outlets include IFAC-PapersOnLine, Applied Thermal Engineering, Control Engineering Practice, and the International Journal of Energy Research.

The scientist has co-authored research with several frequent collaborators, notably:

  • Ola Stenlåås
  • Carlo Beatrice
  • Carlos Jorques Moreno
  • Öivind Andersson
  • Gessica Onofrio

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Per Tunestål demonstrate research intensity in combustion and engine technologies:

  • Effect of piston bowl geometry and compression ratio on in-cylinder combustion and engine performance in a gasoline direct-injection compression ignition engine under different injection conditions, 2020, Applied Energy
  • Combustion sensitivity to the nozzle hole size in an active pre-chamber ultra-lean heavy-duty natural gas engine, 2021, Energy
  • Model Predictive Control of an Advanced Multiple Cylinder Engine With Partially Premixed Combustion Concept, 2020, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics
  • A 3D-CFD Methodology for Combustion Modeling in Active Prechamber SI Engines Operating with Natural Gas, 2022, SAE Technical Papers on CD-ROM/SAE Technical Paper Series
  • Partially premixed combustion optimization using double injection strategy in transient operation, 2020, Applied Thermal Engineering

This body of work reflects a concentration on optimizing combustion processes and engine performance through both experimental and modeling approaches. The scientist's contributions involve aspects of engine design, control strategies, and computational fluid dynamics simulations in the context of advanced combustion engines.

Best Publications

  • Closed-Loop Control of an HCCI Engine

    Jan-Ola Olsson;Per Tunestål;Bengt Johansson

  • Partially Premixed Combustion at High Load using Gasoline and Ethanol, a Comparison with Diesel

    Vittorio Manente;Bengt Johansson;Per Tunestal

  • An advanced internal combustion engine concept for low emissions and high efficiency from idle to max load using gasoline partially premixed combustion

    Vittorio Manente;Claes Goeran Zander;Bengt Johansson;Per Tunestal

  • Compression Ratio Influence on Maximum Load of a Natural Gas Fueled HCCI Engine

    Jan-Ola Olsson;Per Tunestål;Bengt Johansson;Scott Fiveland

  • A Turbocharged Dual-Fuel HCCI Engine

    Jan-Ola Olsson;Per Tunestål;Göran Haraldsson;Bengt Johansson

  • Effects of Different Type of Gasoline Fuels on Heavy Duty Partially Premixed Combustion

    Vittorio Manente;Bengt Johansson;Per Tunestal;William Cannella

  • HCCI Combustion Phasing in a Multi Cylinder Engine Using Variable Compression Ratio

    Göran Haraldsson;Jari Hyvönen;Per Tunestål;Bengt Johansson

  • Effects of ethanol and different type of gasoline fuels on partially premixed combustion from low to high load

    Vittorio Manente;Per Tunestal;Bengt Johansson;William J. Cannella

  • Boosting for High Load HCCI

    Jan-Ola Olsson;Per Tunestål;Bengt Johansson

  • Effect of Pre-Chamber Volume and Nozzle Diameter on Pre-Chamber Ignition in Heavy Duty Natural Gas Engines

    Ashish Shah;Per Tunestal;Bengt Johansson

  • The Effect of Cooled EGR on Emissions and Performance of a Turbocharged HCCI Engine

    Jan-Ola Olsson;Per Tunestål;Jonas Ulfvik;Bengt Johansson

  • HCCI Combustion Phasing with Closed-Loop Combustion Control Using Variable Compression Ratio in a Multi Cylinder Engine

    Göran Haraldsson;Per Tunestål;Bengt Johansson;Jari Hyvönen

  • Lean Burn Natural Gas Operation vs. Stoichiometric Operation with EGR and a Three Way Catalyst

    Patrik Einewall;Per Tunestål;Bengt Johansson

  • HCCI Closed-Loop Combustion Control Using Fast Thermal Management

    Göran Haraldsson;Per Tunestål;Bengt Johansson;Jari Hyvönen

  • Hydrogen Addition For Improved Lean Burn Capability of Slow and Fast Burning Natural Gas Combustion Chambers

    Per Tunestål;Magnus Christensen;Patrik Einewall;Tobias Andersson

  • Cycle-to-cycle Control of a Dual-Fuel HCCI Engine

    Petter Strandh;Johan Bengtsson;Rolf Johansson;Per Tunestål

  • Influence of inlet pressure, EGR, combustion phasing, speed and pilot ratio on high load gasoline partially premixed combustion

    Vittorio Manente;Bengt Johansson;Per Tunestal;William J. Cannella

  • Closed‐loop combustion control of homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) engine dynamics

    Johan Bengtsson;Petter Strandh;Rolf Johansson;Per Tunestål

  • Performance and emissions of diesel-biodiesel-ethanol blends in a light duty compression ignition engine

    Sam Shamun;Giacomo Belgiorno;Gabriele Di Blasio;Carlo Beatrice

  • Detailed numerical simulation of transient mixing and combustion of premixed methane/air mixtures in a pre-chamber/main-chamber system relevant to internal combustion engines

    Fei Qin;Fei Qin;Ashish Shah;Zhi wei Huang;Li-na Peng;Li-na Peng

  • Control of homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) engine dynamics

    J. Bengtsson;F. Strandh;R. Johansson;P. Tunestal

Frequent Co-Authors

Bengt Johansson
Bengt Johansson Technical University of Denmark
Rolf Johansson
Rolf Johansson Lund University
Martin Tuner
Martin Tuner Lund University
Joakim Pagels
Joakim Pagels Lund University
Carlo Beatrice
Carlo Beatrice National Research Council (CNR)
Xue-Song Bai
Xue-Song Bai Lund University
J. Karl Hedrick
J. Karl Hedrick University of California, Berkeley
Thomas Johansson
Thomas Johansson Lund University
Antonio García
Antonio García Universitat Politècnica de València
Javier Monsalve-Serrano
Javier Monsalve-Serrano Universitat Politècnica de València

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The world of Engineering and Technology is rapidly evolving, making flexible learning options more important than ever. Many students are exploring best degrees for stay at home moms, which can also benefit adults looking to balance work, family, and education. These programs provide the chance to advance your skills without sacrificing personal responsibilities.

For those who want to complete qualifications faster, you can find college classes online that fit condensed formats and busy schedules. Students interested in finance or management roles may consider a fast track finance degree or even pursue fast track mba programs to enhance their leadership credentials in a shorter time frame.

Exploring these options can help you craft a unique education and career strategy—whether you are just starting out, changing careers, or looking to advance in a technical field. Online degrees make it possible to learn at your own pace and adapt your studies to meet your personal and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Per Tunestål

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles