World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
53
Citations
22588
World Ranking
3207
National Ranking
1135

Neo D. Martinez publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neo D. Martinez sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 90 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Neo D. Martinez D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neo D. Martinez sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Neo D. Martinez is affiliated with the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Environmental Science, with a focus on multiple interrelated subfields such as Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Sociology and Political Science, and Global and Planetary Change.

Martinez's work addresses a range of topics central to ecological and biological interactions. These topics include:

  • Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Plant and Animal Studies
  • Plant Parasitism and Resistance
  • Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
  • Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
  • Organic Food and Agriculture
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services

Their publication record highlights contributions to both ecological theory and applied environmental biology. Selected recent papers include:

  • Mutualism increases diversity, stability, and function of multiplex networks that integrate pollinators into food webs, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Allometric Trophic Networks From Individuals to Socio-Ecosystems: Consumer-Resource Theory of the Ecological Elephant in the Room, 2020, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
  • Sustaining Economic Exploitation of Complex Ecosystems in Computational Models of Coupled Human-Natural Networks, 2021, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Predicting ecosystem metaphenome from community metagenome: A grand challenge for environmental biology, 2023, Ecology and Evolution
  • From networks to networking, 2023, Nature Physics

The venues publishing Martinez's research reflect a diversity of interdisciplinary scientific outlets including Nature Communications, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Ecology and Evolution, and Nature Physics. This distribution indicates a focus on both ecological complexity and computational approaches to environmental systems.

Frequent collaborators with Martinez include Kayla R. S. Hale, Fernanda S. Valdovinos, Perrine Tonnin, Barbara Bauer, and Rosalyn Rael. These coauthors contribute to a network of scientific work across ecology, network theory, and environmental modeling.

Best Publications

  • Approaching a state shift in Earth’s biosphere

    Anthony D. Barnosky;Elizabeth A. Hadly;Jordi Bascompte;Eric L. Berlow

  • Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: robustness increases with connectance

    Jennifer A. Dunne;Jennifer A. Dunne;Richard J. Williams;Neo D. Martinez

  • Food-web structure and network theory: The role of connectance and size.

    Jennifer A. Dunne;Richard J. Williams;Neo D. Martinez

  • Simple rules yield complex food webs

    Richard J. Williams;Neo D. Martinez

  • Parasites in food webs: the ultimate missing links

    Kevin D. Lafferty;Stefano Allesina;Matias Arim;Cherie J. Briggs

  • Artifacts or Attributes? Effects of Resolution on the Little Rock Lake Food Web

    Neo D. Martinez

  • Food webs: reconciling the structure and function of biodiversity

    Ross M. Thompson;Ulrich Brose;Jennifer A. Dunne;Robert O. Hall

  • CONSUMER–RESOURCE BODY-SIZE RELATIONSHIPS IN NATURAL FOOD WEBS

    Ulrich Brose;Tomas Jonsson;Eric L. Berlow;Eric L. Berlow;Philip Warren

  • Allometric scaling enhances stability in complex food webs

    Ulrich Brose;Richard J. Williams;Neo D. Martinez

  • TROPHIC RANK AND THE SPECIES-AREA RELATIONSHIP

    Robert D. Holt;John H. Lawton;Gary A. Polis;Neo D. Martinez

  • Two degrees of separation in complex food webs.

    Richard J. Williams;Eric L. Berlow;Jennifer A. Dunne;Jennifer A. Dunne;Albert László Barabási

  • ESTIMATING SPECIES RICHNESS: SENSITIVITY TO SAMPLE COVERAGE AND INSENSITIVITY TO SPATIAL PATTERNS

    Ulrich Brose;Neo D. Martinez;Richard J. Williams

  • Network structure and robustness of marine food webs

    Jennifer A. Dunne;Jennifer A. Dunne;Richard J. Williams;Richard J. Williams;Neo D. Martinez;Neo D. Martinez

  • Constant Connectance in Community Food Webs

    Neo D. Martinez

  • More than a meal… integrating non-feeding interactions into food webs.

    Sonia Kéfi;Sonia Kéfi;Eric L. Berlow;Eric L. Berlow;Evie A. Wieters;Evie A. Wieters;Sergio A. Navarrete

  • Limits to trophic levels and omnivory in complex food webs: theory and data.

    Richard J. Williams;Neo D. Martinez

  • Simple prediction of interaction strengths in complex food webs.

    Eric L. Berlow;Jennifer A. Dunne;Neo D. Martinez;Philip B. Stark

  • Improving Food Webs

    J. E. Cohen;R. A. Beaver;S. H. Cousins;D. L. DeAngelis

  • Predators, parasitoids and pathogens: species richness, trophic generality and body sizes in a natural food web

    Jane Memmott;ND Martinez;JE Cohen

  • Parasites affect food web structure primarily through increased diversity and complexity.

    Jennifer A. Dunne;Kevin D. Lafferty;Andrew P. Dobson;Ryan F. Hechinger

  • EFFECTS OF SAMPLING EFFORT ON CHARACTERIZATION OF FOOD-WEB STRUCTURE

    Neo D. Martinez;Bradford A. Hawkins;Hassan Ali Dawah;Brian P. Feifarek

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard J. Williams
Richard J. Williams Vibrant Data Labs
Jennifer A. Dunne
Jennifer A. Dunne Santa Fe Institute
Ulrich Brose
Ulrich Brose Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Eric L. Berlow
Eric L. Berlow University of California, Merced
Jane Memmott
Jane Memmott University of Bristol
Kevin D. Lafferty
Kevin D. Lafferty United States Geological Survey
Joel E. Cohen
Joel E. Cohen Rockefeller University
Pablo A. Marquet
Pablo A. Marquet Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Owen L. Petchey
Owen L. Petchey University of Zurich
Sonia Kéfi
Sonia Kéfi University of Montpellier

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Ecology and Evolution can benefit from a flexible, accredited education. Many students consider distance learning, but choosing the right university is crucial. It's important to compare the program quality and curriculum, much like those evaluating capella university vs wgu rn to bsn programs. This type of comparison helps ensure your degree will be respected and valued in the job market.

For those seeking to advance, bridge programs like the bsn to msn online programs offer a model for seamless transitions between degree levels. Although these are healthcare examples, similar progressions exist in science and environmental fields, supporting continued learning and specialized research.

Prospective students are encouraged to search for non profit universities to ensure high-quality instruction without excessive tuition costs. Additionally, if you have military experience or obligations, you may want to review the best online colleges for military to find an institution tailored to your unique needs.

Best Scientists Citing Neo D. Martinez

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles