World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Nadine Van Roy

Nadine Van Roy

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
58
Citations
34116
World Ranking
12872
National Ranking
236

Nadine Van Roy publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadine Van Roy sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 274 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Nadine Van Roy D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadine Van Roy sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nadine Van Roy is affiliated with Ghent University in Belgium, contributing extensively to the fields of medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their research spans multiple subfields including molecular biology, neurology, cancer research, oncology, and genetics.

Their work focuses on several main topics, notably neuroblastoma research and treatments, cancer genomics and diagnostics, sarcoma diagnosis and treatment, renal and related cancers, epigenetics and DNA methylation, glioma diagnosis and treatment, and peptidase inhibition and analysis.

Van Roy has published frequently in various scientific venues. The most common publication outlets include:

  • Nature Medicine
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • European Journal of Pediatrics
  • Blood
  • Pathology - Research and Practice

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Van Roy include:

  • Clinical evolution, genetic landscape and trajectories of clonal hematopoiesis in SAMD9/SAMD9L syndromes (2021, Nature Medicine)
  • Frequency and Prognostic Impact of ALK Amplifications and Mutations in the European Neuroblastoma Study Group (SIOPEN) High-Risk Neuroblastoma Trial (HR-NBL1) (2021, Journal of Clinical Oncology)
  • The pitfalls and promise of liquid biopsies for diagnosing and treating solid tumors in children: a review (2020, European Journal of Pediatrics)
  • Minimally invasive classification of paediatric solid tumours using reduced representation bisulphite sequencing of cell-free DNA: a proof-of-principle study (2020, Epigenetics)
  • Extrauterine Mesonephric-like Neoplasms (2021, The American Journal of Surgical Pathology)

Van Roy frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Jo Van Dorpe
  • Katleen De Preter
  • Bram De Wilde
  • Barbara De Moerloose
  • Frank Speleman

Best Publications

  • Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes

    Jo Vandesompele;Katleen De Preter;Filip Pattyn;Bruce Poppe

  • EV-TRACK: transparent reporting and centralizing knowledge in extracellular vesicle research

    Jan Van Deun;Pieter Mestdagh;Patrizia Agostinis;Özden Akay

  • Exhaustive mutation analysis of the NF1 gene allows identification of 95% of mutations and reveals a high frequency of unusual splicing defects.

    Ludwine M. Messiaen;Tom Callens;Geert Mortier;Diane Beysen

  • Genome dynamics of the human embryonic kidney 293 lineage in response to cell biology manipulations.

    Yao-Cheng Lin;Morgane Boone;Leander Meuris;Irma Lemmens

  • Loss-of-function mutations in LEMD3 result in osteopoikilosis, Buschke-Ollendorff syndrome and melorheostosis.

    Jan Hellemans;Olena Preobrazhenska;Andy Willaert;Philippe Debeer

  • PHF6 mutations in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    Pieter van Vlierberghe;Pieter van Vlierberghe;Pieter van Vlierberghe;Teresa Palomero;Hossein Khiabanian;Joni van der Meulen

  • Meta-analysis of Neuroblastomas Reveals a Skewed ALK Mutation Spectrum in Tumors with MYCN Amplification

    Sara De Brouwer;Katleen De Preter;Candy Kumps;Piotr Zabrocki

  • The need for transparency and good practices in the qPCR literature

    Stephen A. Bustin;Vladimir Benes;Jeremy A. Garson;Jan Hellemans

  • The H3K27me3 demethylase UTX is a gender-specific tumor suppressor in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    Joni Van der Meulen;Viraj Sanghvi;Konstantinos Mavrakis;Kaat Durinck

  • Predicting outcomes for children with neuroblastoma using a multigene-expression signature: a retrospective SIOPEN/COG/GPOH study

    Joëlle Vermeulen;Katleen De Preter;Arlene Naranjo;Liesbeth Vercruysse

  • Unequivocal Delineation of Clinicogenetic Subgroups and Development of a New Model for Improved Outcome Prediction in Neuroblastoma

    Jo Vandesompele;Michael Baudis;Katleen De Preter;Nadine Van Roy

  • Quantification of MYCN, DDX1, and NAG Gene Copy Number in Neuroblastoma Using a Real-Time Quantitative PCR Assay

    Katleen De Preter;Frank Speleman;Valérie Combaret;John Lunec

  • A Novel Gene Family NBPF: Intricate Structure Generated by Gene Duplications During Primate Evolution

    Karl Vandepoele;Nadine Van Roy;Katrien Staes;Franki Speleman

  • Genetic heterogeneity of neuroblastoma studied by comparative genomic hybridization

    Jo Vandesompele;Nadine Van Roy;Mireille Van Gele;Geneviève Laureys

  • A new recurrent inversion, inv(7)(p15q34), leads to transcriptional activation of HOXA10 and HOXA11 in a subset of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemias

    F Speleman;B Cauwelier;N Dastugue;J Cools;J Cools

  • Mutation analysis of P73 and TP53 in Merkel cell carcinoma.

    M Van Gele;M Kaghad;J H Leonard;N Van Roy

  • Detection of Staphylococcus Aureus in Nasal Tissue with Peptide Nucleic Acid–Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization:

    Marie-Noëlle Corriveau;Nan Zhang;Gabriele Holtappels;Nadine Van Roy

  • MYCN/c-MYC-induced microRNAs repress coding gene networks associated with poor outcome in MYCN/c-MYC-activated tumors

    P Mestdagh;E Fredlund;F Pattyn;J H Schulte

  • MYC-containing double minutes in hematologic malignancies: evidence in favor of the episome model and exclusion of MYC as the target gene

    Clelia Tiziana Storlazzi;Thoas Fioretos;Cecilia Surace;Angelo Lonoce

  • Novel biological insights in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    Kaat Durinck;Steven Goossens;Steven Goossens;Sofie Peirs;Annelynn Wallaert

Frequent Co-Authors

Franki Speleman
Franki Speleman Ghent University
Jo Vandesompele
Jo Vandesompele Ghent University
Katleen De Preter
Katleen De Preter Ghent University
Genevieve Laureys
Genevieve Laureys Ghent University Hospital
Anne De Paepe
Anne De Paepe Ghent University Hospital
Bruce Poppe
Bruce Poppe Ghent University Hospital
Björn Menten
Björn Menten Ghent University Hospital
Pieter Mestdagh
Pieter Mestdagh Ghent University
Rogier Versteeg
Rogier Versteeg University of Amsterdam
Tom Taghon
Tom Taghon Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry can open the door to many rewarding careers. If you're looking for flexible or accelerated education options, there are several online programs that align with these fields. Nurses interested in advancing their credentials may consider rn to bsn programs, which offer a convenient route to higher qualifications and broader career options.

For those drawn toward healthcare administration, many universities now offer 1 year mha programs online. These fast-tracked degrees prepare graduates for leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and research institutions.

Mental health is another growing field. Registered nurses with a biology or biochemistry background often pursue advanced practice roles through psych np programs, enabling them to specialize in psychiatric and mental health care.

Finally, if nutrition science interests you, explore accelerated dietitian programs. These online degrees can qualify you to become a registered dietitian quickly, combining your biology knowledge with a focus on health and wellness.

Best Scientists Citing Nadine Van Roy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles