World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
8432
World Ranking
8461
National Ranking
4527

Miriam Liss publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miriam Liss sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 72 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Miriam Liss D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miriam Liss sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Miriam Liss is affiliated with the University of Mary Washington in the United States and conducts research primarily in the fields of psychology and social sciences. Their work spans multiple subfields, including clinical psychology, sociology and political science, social psychology, applied psychology, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The main topics of study for Miriam Liss focus on areas related to mental health and social identity. These include:

  • LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Child Therapy and Development

Their recent publications reflect these themes and contribute to several academic journals. Notable papers include:

  • "Mindfulness as a mediator in the relationship between social media engagement and depression in young adults," 2021, published in Personality and Individual Differences
  • "Safety and belonging as explanations for mental health disparities among sexual minority college students," 2020, Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity
  • "Mindfulness as a mediator and moderator in the relationship between adverse childhood experiences and depression," 2021, Current Psychology
  • "Belonging and loneliness as mechanisms in the psychological impact of discrimination among transgender college students," 2022, Journal of LGBT Youth
  • "Mental health and general psychological processes among asexual, bisexual, and gay/lesbian college students in the United States," 2021, Psychology and Sexuality

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Miriam Liss include:

  • Laura C. Wilson
  • Amelia Jones
  • Megan Hook
  • Purnaja Podduturi
  • Haley McKeen

Their research appears in specialized publication venues such as Personality and Individual Differences, Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, Current Psychology, Journal of LGBT Youth, and Psychology and Sexuality. This distribution reflects diverse interdisciplinary interests within psychological research related to social identity and mental health.

Best Publications

  • Extraversion, neuroticism, attachment style and fear of missing out as predictors of social media use and addiction

    David Blackwell;Carrie Leaman;Rose Tramposch;Ciera Osborne

  • Helping or Hovering? The Effects of Helicopter Parenting on College Students’ Well-Being

    Holly H. Schiffrin;Miriam Liss;Haley Miles-McLean;Katherine A. Geary

  • Sensory and attention abnormalities in autistic spectrum disorders

    Miriam Liss;Celine Saulnier;Deborah Fein;Marcel Kinsbourne

  • Predictors and Correlates of Adaptive Functioning in Children with Developmental Disorders

    Miriam Liss;Brian Harel;Deborah Fein;Doris Allen

  • The relationships between sensory processing sensitivity, alexithymia, autism, depression, and anxiety

    Miriam Liss;Jennifer Mailloux;Mindy J. Erchull

  • Executive Functioning in High‐functioning Children with Autism

    Miriam Liss;Deborah Fein;Doris Allen;Michelle Dunn

  • Insight into the Parenthood Paradox: Mental Health Outcomes of Intensive Mothering

    Kathryn M. Rizzo;Holly H. Schiffrin;Miriam Liss

  • Sensory processing sensitivity and its relation to parental bonding, anxiety, and depression

    Miriam Liss;Laura Timmel;Kelin Baxley;Patrick Killingsworth

  • Empowering or Oppressing? Development and Exploration of the Enjoyment of Sexualization Scale

    Miriam Liss;Mindy J. Erchull;Laura R. Ramsey

  • Maternal Guilt and Shame: The Role of Self-discrepancy and Fear of Negative Evaluation

    Miriam Liss;Holly H. Schiffrin;Kathryn M. Rizzo

  • What Makes a Feminist? Predictors and Correlates of Feminist Social Identity in College Women

    Miriam Liss;Christy O'Connor;Elena Morosky;Mary Crawford

  • Predictors and correlates of collective action

    Miriam Liss;Mary Crawford;Danielle Popp

  • Development and Validation of a Quantitative Measure of Intensive Parenting Attitudes

    Miriam Liss;Holly H. Schiffrin;Virginia H. Mackintosh;Haley Miles-McLean

  • Relationships between sensory processing style, adult attachment, and coping

    Elisabeth M. Jerome;Miriam Liss

  • The Effects of Helicopter Parenting on Academic Motivation

    Holly H. Schiffrin;Miriam Liss

  • Feminism: What is it Good For? Feminine Norms and Objectification as the Link between Feminist Identity and Clinically Relevant Outcomes

    Molly M. Hurt;Jaclyn A. Nelson;Dixie L. Turner;Megan E. Haines

  • MEN WANT EQUALITY, BUT WOMEN DON'T EXPECT IT: YOUNG ADULTS' EXPECTATIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN HOUSEHOLD AND CHILD CARE CHORES

    Sabrina F. Askari;Miriam Liss;Mindy J. Erchull;Samantha E. Staebell

  • Identity in Action: Predictors of Feminist Self-Identification and Collective Action

    Jaclyn A. Nelson;Miriam Liss;Mindy J. Erchull;Molly M. Hurt

  • Not hating what you see: Self-compassion may protect against negative mental health variables connected to self-objectification in college women

    Miriam Liss;Mindy J. Erchull

  • Psychological characteristics of self-injurious behavior

    Erin Polk;Miriam Liss

Frequent Co-Authors

Mindy J. Erchull
Mindy J. Erchull University of Mary Washington
Deborah Fein
Deborah Fein University of Connecticut
Mary Crawford
Mary Crawford University of Connecticut
Carl Feinstein
Carl Feinstein Stanford University
Robin G. Morris
Robin G. Morris King's College London
Diana L. Robins
Diana L. Robins Drexel University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in psychology opens the door to a wide array of online degree programs and professional opportunities. Many students pursue degrees in psychology before specializing further, often choosing to become licensed counselors or therapists.

Requirements for credentialing and practice vary by state and city. For instance, the Madison mental health counselor certification requirements outline specific educational prerequisites and supervised experience for prospective counselors in Wisconsin. Meanwhile, those interested in the South can review the process on how to become a mental health counselor in Memphis to understand Tennessee’s regulations.

If you plan to practice in Arizona, it’s important to stay informed about the mental health counselor requirements in Mesa. Similarly, future professionals aiming to work in Florida can learn how to become a mental health counselor in Miami.

Exploring these career pathways not only helps you choose the right online degree but also ensures you meet the local requirements to build a successful psychology career wherever you choose to practice.

Best Scientists Citing Miriam Liss

Trending Scientists