World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
57
Citations
23063
World Ranking
3736
National Ranking
1785

Cynthia Rudin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cynthia Rudin sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 220 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Cynthia Rudin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cynthia Rudin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Cynthia Rudin is affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research predominantly spans the field of Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Biomedical Engineering, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • HIV Research and Treatment
  • Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference

The scientist has contributed to several recent publications, notable among them are:

  • "Interpretable machine learning: Fundamental principles and 10 grand challenges," 2022, published in Statistics Surveys
  • "Concept whitening for interpretable image recognition," 2020, published in Nature Machine Intelligence
  • "Understanding How Dimension Reduction Tools Work: An Empirical Approach to Deciphering t-SNE, UMAP, TriMAP, and PaCMAP for Data Visualization," 2020, published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "A case-based interpretable deep learning model for classification of mass lesions in digital mammography," 2021, published in Nature Machine Intelligence
  • "Towards a comprehensive evaluation of dimension reduction methods for transcriptomic data visualization," 2022, published in Communications Biology

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Alexander Volfovsky
  • Lesia Semenova
  • Zhicheng Guo
  • Margo Seltzer
  • Marco Morucci

Cynthia Rudin's work appears regularly in several publication venues, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Harvard Data Science Review
  • PubMed
  • Nature Machine Intelligence

In 2019, they were recognized as a Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA).

Best Publications

  • Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead

    Cynthia Rudin

  • All Models are Wrong, but Many are Useful: Learning a Variable's Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneously

    Aaron Fisher;Cynthia Rudin;Francesca Dominici

  • Interpretable classifiers using rules and Bayesian analysis: Building a better stroke prediction model

    Benjamin Letham;Cynthia Rudin;Tyler H. McCormick;David Madigan

  • Interpretable Machine Learning: Fundamental Principles and 10 Grand Challenges

    Cynthia Rudin;Chaofan Chen;Zhi Chen;Haiyang Huang

  • The Big Data Newsvendor: Practical Insights from Machine Learning

    Gah-Yi Ban;Cynthia Rudin

  • This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognition

    Chaofan Chen;Oscar Li;Chaofan Tao;Alina Jade Barnett

  • Deep Learning for Case-Based Reasoning Through Prototypes: A Neural Network That Explains Its Predictions

    Oscar Li;Hao Liu;Chaofan Chen;Cynthia Rudin

  • PULSE: Self-Supervised Photo Upsampling via Latent Space Exploration of Generative Models

    Sachit Menon;Alexandru Damian;Shijia Hu;Nikhil Ravi

  • Supersparse linear integer models for optimized medical scoring systems

    Berk Ustun;Cynthia Rudin

  • Why Are We Using Black Box Models in AI When We Don’t Need To? A Lesson From An Explainable AI Competition

    Cynthia Rudin;Joanna Radin

  • Interpretable classification models for recidivism prediction

    Jiaming Zeng;Berk Ustun;Cynthia Rudin

  • Machine Learning for the New York City Power Grid

    C. Rudin;D. Waltz;R. N. Anderson;A. Boulanger

  • The Bayesian Case Model: A Generative Approach for Case-Based Reasoning and Prototype Classification

    Been Kim;Cynthia Rudin;Julie A Shah

  • This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognition

    Chaofan Chen;Oscar Li;Daniel Tao;Alina Barnett

  • Learning Certifiably Optimal Rule Lists for Categorical Data

    Elaine Angelino;Nicholas Larus-Stone;Daniel Alabi;Margo I. Seltzer

  • Concept whitening for interpretable image recognition

    Zhi Chen;Yijie Bei;Cynthia Rudin

  • Falling Rule Lists

    Fulton Wang;Cynthia Rudin

  • Understanding How Dimension Reduction Tools Work: An Empirical Approach to Deciphering t-SNE, UMAP, TriMap, and PaCMAP for Data Visualization

    Yingfan Wang;Haiyang Huang;Cynthia Rudin;Yaron Shaposhnik

  • A Bayesian framework for learning rule sets for interpretable classification

    Tong Wang;Cynthia Rudin;Finale Doshi-Velez;Yimin Liu

  • The P-Norm Push: A Simple Convex Ranking Algorithm that Concentrates at the Top of the List

    Cynthia Rudin

  • Scalable Bayesian rule lists

    Hongyu Yang;Cynthia Rudin;Margo Seltzer

  • The Big Data Newsvendor: Practical Insights from Machine Learning Analysis

    Cynthia Rudin;Gah-Yi Vahn

Frequent Co-Authors

David Madigan
David Madigan Northeastern University
Rebecca J. Passonneau
Rebecca J. Passonneau Pennsylvania State University
Robert E. Schapire
Robert E. Schapire Microsoft (United States)
Margo Seltzer
Margo Seltzer University of British Columbia
Roger N. Anderson
Roger N. Anderson Columbia University
Tong Wang
Tong Wang University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Ingrid Daubechies
Ingrid Daubechies Duke University
Been Kim
Been Kim Google (United States)
Gail E. Kaiser
Gail E. Kaiser Columbia University
Haym Hirsh
Haym Hirsh Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Computer Science can open up a wealth of flexible options for advancing your education and career. Students seeking a quick path to further qualifications might consider quick masters degrees online, which allow for faster completion and entry into the workforce.

It’s important to choose a program that matches current industry needs. Many learners look for most in demand masters degrees to increase their job prospects and earning potential in fields like artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and software development.

For those at the beginning of their academic journey, an associates degree online can be a practical first step. These programs offer foundational knowledge and often serve as a springboard to further study or entry-level roles.

Cost is another crucial factor. Many institutions now provide cheap online degrees fast, making it easier for students to advance their education without significant financial strain. Consider your goals and research your options to find the best fit for your future.

Best Scientists Citing Cynthia Rudin

Trending Scientists