World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
76
Citations
18665
World Ranking
1941
National Ranking
204

Dorothee P. Auer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dorothee P. Auer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 405 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Dorothee P. Auer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dorothee P. Auer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The endogenous cannabinoid system affects energy balance via central orexigenic drive and peripheral lipogenesis

    Daniela Cota;Giovanni Marsicano;Matthias Tschöp;Yvonne Grübler

  • Reduced glutamate in the anterior cingulate cortex in depression: an in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study.

    Dorothee P Auer;Benno Pütz;Eduard Kraft;Bernadette Lipinski

  • Disconnection as a mechanism for cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis.

    R. A. Dineen;J. Vilisaar;J. Hlinka;C. M. Bradshaw

  • Brain structures mediating cardiovascular arousal and interoceptive awareness

    Olga Pollatos;Rainer Schandry;Dorothee P. Auer;Christian Kaufmann

  • The 'swallow tail' appearance of the healthy nigrosome - a new accurate test of Parkinson's disease: a case-control and retrospective cross-sectional MRI study at 3T

    Stefan T. Schwarz;Mohammed Afzal;Paul S. Morgan;Nin Bajaj

  • Detection of intraplaque hemorrhage by magnetic resonance imaging in symptomatic patients with mild to moderate carotid stenosis predicts recurrent neurological events.

    Nishath Altaf;Lucy Daniels;Paul S. Morgan;Dorothee Auer

  • Visualization of nigrosome 1 and its loss in PD Pathoanatomical correlation and in vivo 7 T MRI

    Anna I. Blazejewska;Stefan T. Schwarz;Alain Pitiot;Mary C. Stephenson

  • Brain activation and hypothalamic functional connectivity during human non-rapid eye movement sleep: an EEG/fMRI study.

    C. Kaufmann;R. Wehrle;T. C. Wetter;F. Holsboer

  • Differential lesion patterns in CADASIL and sporadic subcortical arteriosclerotic encephalopathy: MR imaging study with statistical parametric group comparison.

    Dorothee P. Auer;Benno Pütz;Christoff Gössl;Gregor-Konstantin Elbel

  • Functional microstates within human REM sleep: first evidence from fMRI of a thalamocortical network specific for phasic REM periods

    Renate Wehrle;Christian Kaufmann;Thomas C. Wetter;Florian Holsboer

  • Carotid Intraplaque Hemorrhage Predicts Recurrent Symptoms in Patients With High-Grade Carotid Stenosis

    Nishath Altaf;Shane T. MacSweeney;John Gladman;Dorothee P. Auer

  • Spontaneous low-frequency blood oxygenation level-dependent fluctuations and functional connectivity analysis of the ‘resting’ brain

    Dorothee P. Auer

  • High resolution magnetic susceptibility mapping of the substantia nigra in Parkinson's disease.

    Ashley K. Lotfipour;Samuel Wharton;Stefan T. Schwarz;V. Gontu

  • Localized connectivity in depression: A meta-analysis of resting state functional imaging studies

    Sarina J. Iwabuchi;Rajeev Krishnadas;Chunbo Li;Dorothee P. Auer

  • Altered processing of acoustic stimuli during sleep: reduced auditory activation and visual deactivation detected by a combined fMRI/EEG study.

    Michael Czisch;Thomas C. Wetter;Christian Kaufmann;Thomas Pollmächer

  • Carotid plaque hemorrhage on magnetic resonance imaging strongly predicts recurrent ischemia and stroke

    Akram A. Hosseini;Neghal Kandiyil;Shane T. S. MacSweeney;Nishath Altaf

  • Multi-centre reproducibility of diffusion MRI parameters for clinical sequences in the brain.

    Matthew Grech-Sollars;Patrick W Hales;Keiko Miyazaki;Felix Raschke

  • Prediction of Stroke Risk by Detection of Hemorrhage in Carotid Plaques: Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data

    Andreas Schindler;Regina Schinner;Nishaf Altaf;Akram A. Hosseini

  • T1‐Weighted MRI shows stage‐dependent substantia nigra signal loss in Parkinson's disease

    Stefan T. Schwarz;Timothy Rittman;Vamsi Gontu;Paul S. Morgan;Paul S. Morgan

  • Functional MRI during sleep: BOLD signal decreases and their electrophysiological correlates

    Michael Czisch;Renate Wehrle;Christian Kaufmann;Thomas C. Wetter

  • On the reliability of quantitative clinical magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the human brain.

    Timo Schirmer;Dorothee P. Auer

  • Visualization of nigrosome 1 and its loss in PD: Pathoanatomical correlation and in vivo 7T MRIAuthor Response

    Christoph Mueller;Anna I. Blazejewska;Bernadette Pinter;Eva Reiter

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian Kaufmann
Christian Kaufmann Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Michael Czisch
Michael Czisch Max Planck Society
Florian Holsboer
Florian Holsboer Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry
Axel Wismüller
Axel Wismüller University of Rochester
Penny A. Gowland
Penny A. Gowland University of Nottingham
Peter F. Liddle
Peter F. Liddle University of Nottingham
Simon Bailey
Simon Bailey Royal Victoria Infirmary
Li Bai
Li Bai University of Nottingham
Paul M. Matthews
Paul M. Matthews Imperial College London
Thomas Klopstock
Thomas Klopstock Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open the door to diverse career options and specializations. For those interested in flexible learning, many accredited online colleges that accept fafsa offer affordable avenues to start or continue your studies. These programs allow students to balance education with work or family commitments.

If you’re aiming for a lucrative career, you might research interesting majors that pay well to identify fields related to neuroscience with strong earning potential. Furthermore, earning certificates online can quickly build specialized skills that are highly valued in health science, research, and technology sectors.

For those seeking a faster or less demanding educational path, there are easy degrees to get online that can complement your neuroscience interests or serve as a stepping stone into advanced study. Whichever path you choose, online options make acquiring knowledge and credentials in neuroscience more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Dorothee P. Auer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles