World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 89 12473 11734 6390 5909 154 40467

Miles Herkenham publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Miles Herkenham between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Miles Herkenham published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 1991. 3 of the 158 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 1991. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 2 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 7 publications 1982: 6 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 8 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 7 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 5 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 6 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 3 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
1972 2025

158 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Miles Herkenham: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 1
1978 1
1979 2
1980 3
1981 7
1982 6
1983 2
1984 8
1985 4
1986 7
1987 5
1988 3
1989 3
1990 5
1991 9
1992 7
1993 2
1994 6
1995 2
1996 2
1997 2
1998 5
1999 9
2000 6
2001 1
2002 5
2003 2
2004 2
2005 5
2006 1
2007 1
2008 0
2009 2
2010 2
2011 2
2012 1
2013 6
2014 0
2015 1
2016 3
2017 4
2018 2
2019 2
2020 1
2021 1
2022 1
2023 2
2024 1
2025 2
Total 158
Download as CSV

Miles Herkenham publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miles Herkenham sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 154 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73 154
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Miles Herkenham D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miles Herkenham sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970 89
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Miles Herkenham is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with a significant emphasis on neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms. They have contributed extensively to understanding the molecular and cellular processes underlying neurological disorders and the immune system's role in brain function and pathology.

The main fields of study for Herkenham include:

  • Neuroscience

Subfields of study connected to their research are:

  • Neurology
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Immunology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Molecular Biology

Herkenham's work covers various topics within neuroscience, such as:

  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Immune Response and Inflammation
  • Immune cells in cancer
  • Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • S100 Proteins and Annexins

Their publications have appeared predominantly in these venues:

  • Brain Behavior and Immunity
  • IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology CITE
  • Journal of Neuroinflammation
  • Nature Communications
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Miles Herkenham include:

  • Analysis of cerebrovascular dysfunction caused by chronic social defeat in mice, 2020, Brain Behavior and Immunity
  • CCR2 monocytes repair cerebrovascular damage caused by chronic social defeat stress, 2022, Brain Behavior and Immunity
  • B-cells are abnormal in psychosocial stress and regulate meningeal myeloid cell activation, 2021, Brain Behavior and Immunity
  • Chronic social defeat alters brain vascular-associated cell gene expression patterns leading to vascular dysfunction and immune system activation, 2023, Journal of Neuroinflammation
  • Cannabinoid receptors in GtoPdb v.2023.1, 2023, IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology CITE

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Michael L. Lehmann
  • Chelsie N. Poffenberger
  • Joshua D. Samuels
  • Stacey L. Kigar
  • Abdel G. Elkahloun

Best Publications

  • International Union of Pharmacology. XXVII. Classification of Cannabinoid Receptors

    A C Howlett;F Barth;T I Bonner;G Cabral

  • Characterization and localization of cannabinoid receptors in rat brain: a quantitative in vitro autoradiographic study

    M Herkenham;A B Lynn;M R Johnson;L S Melvin

  • Cannabinoid receptor localization in brain

    M Herkenham;A B Lynn;M D Little;M R Johnson

  • Increased mortality, hypoactivity, and hypoalgesia in cannabinoid CB1 receptor knockout mice

    Andreas Zimmer;Anne M. Zimmer;Andrea G. Hohmann;Miles Herkenham

  • Efferent connections of the habenular nuclei in the rat

    Miles Herkenham;Walle J. H. Nauta

  • Afferent connections of the habenular nuclei in the rat. A horseradish peroxidase study, with a note on the fiber‐of‐passage problem

    Miles Herkenham;Walle J. H. Nauta

  • Intraneuronal generation of a pyridinium metabolite may cause drug-induced parkinsonism.

    S P Markey;J N Johannessen;C C Chiueh;R S Burns

  • The neostriatal mosaic: II. Patch- and matrix-directed mesostriatal dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic systems

    CR Gerfen;M Herkenham;J Thibault

  • Laminar organization of thalamic projections to the rat neocortex

    Miles Herkenham

  • Mosaic distribution of opiate receptors, parafascicular projections and acetylcholinesterase in rat striatum.

    Miles Herkenham;Candace B. Pert

  • Altered expression of hypothalamic neuropeptide mRNAs in food-restricted and food-deprived rats.

    Linda S. Brady;Mark A. Smith;Philip W. Gold;Miles Herkenham

  • Mismatches between neurotransmitter and receptor localizations in brain: observations and implications.

    M. Herkenham

  • Light microscopic localization of brain opiate receptors: a general autoradiographic method which preserves tissue quality

    M Herkenham;CB Pert

  • The afferent and efferent connections of the ventromedial thalamic nucleus in the rat.

    Miles Herkenham

  • The connections of the nucleus reuniens thalami: Evidence for a direct thalamo-hippocampal pathway in the rat†

    Miles Herkenham

  • Neuronal localization of cannabinoid receptors in the basal ganglia of the rat

    M Herkenham;A B Lynn;B R de Costa;E K Richfield

  • Thalamoamygdaloid projections in the rat: A test of the amygdala's role in sensory processing

    Blair H. Turner;Miles Herkenham

  • Neostriatal projections from individual cortical fields conform to histochemically distinct striatal compartments in the rat

    John P. Donoghue;Miles Herkenham

  • Toll-like receptor 4 on nonhematopoietic cells sustains CNS inflammation during endotoxemia, independent of systemic cytokines.

    Sumana Chakravarty;Miles Herkenham

  • Long-term antidepressant administration alters corticotropin-releasing hormone, tyrosine hydroxylase, and mineralocorticoid receptor gene expression in rat brain. Therapeutic implications.

    L S Brady;H J Whitfield;R J Fox;P W Gold

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenner C. Rice
Kenner C. Rice National Institutes of Health
Candace B. Pert
Candace B. Pert National Institutes of Health
Candace B. Pert
Candace B. Pert Georgetown University
Allyn C. Howlett
Allyn C. Howlett Wake Forest University
Richard B. Rothman
Richard B. Rothman National Institute on Drug Abuse
Arthur E. Jacobson
Arthur E. Jacobson National Institutes of Health
Abdel G. Elkahloun
Abdel G. Elkahloun National Human Genome Research Institute
Rémi Quirion
Rémi Quirion Douglas Mental Health University Institute
Philip W. Gold
Philip W. Gold National Institutes of Health
Tom I. Bonner
Tom I. Bonner National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine does not have to mean a traditional path. Today, there are diverse online education options that can lead to rewarding roles in healthcare. One popular choice is enrolling in rhia certification programs online, which prepare students for management positions in health information. These programs emphasize data accuracy, patient privacy, and compliance.

Another growing field is medical coding and billing. Through a medical coding certification online, you can acquire the skills needed to organize and process crucial medical records—all from home, on your own schedule.

For those aiming to provide direct patient care, there are flexible online nurse practitioner programs. These degrees allow registered nurses to advance their practice and take on more responsibility, even without interrupting their careers.

If becoming a nurse is your goal, affordable nursing programs are available online, providing a practical and accessible way to start your journey in healthcare. Each of these pathways offers unique career prospects to join the medical field beyond the traditional MD route.

Best Scientists Citing Miles Herkenham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles