World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
41
Citations
7036
World Ranking
7671
National Ranking
2738

Matthew S. Landis publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew S. Landis sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 100 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Matthew S. Landis D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew S. Landis sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthew S. Landis is affiliated with the Environmental Protection Agency in the United States, contributing extensively to environmental science and earth and planetary sciences. Their research focuses primarily on atmospheric science, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, global and planetary change, environmental engineering, and environmental chemistry.

Their work covers several main topics, including atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, air quality and health impacts, air quality monitoring and forecasting, fire effects on ecosystems, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, mercury impact and mitigation studies, and toxic organic pollutants impact.

Recent significant publications by Matthew S. Landis include:

  • Comparison of ozone measurement methods in biomass burning smoke: an evaluation under field and laboratory conditions, 2021, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • The U.S. EPA wildland fire sensor challenge: Performance and evaluation of solver submitted multi-pollutant sensor systems, 2021, Atmospheric Environment
  • Associations of Air Pollution and Pediatric Asthma in Cleveland, Ohio, 2021, The Scientific World JOURNAL
  • Air Quality Sensor Experts Convene: Current Quality Assurance Considerations for Credible Data, 2024, ACS ES&T Air
  • Unexpected anthropogenic emission decreases explain recent atmospheric mercury concentration declines, 2024, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Russell Long
  • S. P. Urbanski
  • Andrew Habel
  • Maribel Colón
  • Jonathan D. Krug

Key publication venues where Matthew S. Landis has published multiple papers include:

  • Atmospheric Environment
  • ACS ES&T Air
  • Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques

Best Publications

  • Dynamic oxidation of gaseous mercury in the Arctic troposphere at polar sunrise.

    Steve E. Lindberg;Steve Brooks;C.-J. Lin;Karen J. Scott

  • Development and characterization of an annular denuder methodology for the measurement of divalent inorganic reactive gaseous mercury in ambient air.

    Matthew S. Landis;Robert K. Stevens;Frank Schaedlich;Eric M. Prestbo

  • Field evaluation of low-cost particulate matter sensors in high- and low-concentration environments

    Tongshu Zheng;Michael H. Bergin;Karoline K. Johnson;Sachchida N. Tripathi

  • Atmospheric mercury concentrations observed at ground-based monitoring sites globally distributed in the framework of the GMOS network

    Francesca Sprovieri;Nicola Pirrone;Mariantonia Bencardino;Francesco D'Amore

  • Mutagenicity and lung toxicity of smoldering vs. flaming emissions from various biomass fuels: implications for health effects from wildland fires.

    Yong Ho Kim;Yong Ho Kim;Sarah H Warren;Q Todd Krantz;Charly King

  • Atmospheric mercury deposition to Lake Michigan during the Lake Michigan Mass Balance Study.

    Matthew S. Landis;Gerald J. Keeler

  • Sources of Mercury Wet Deposition in Eastern Ohio, USA

    Gerald J. Keeler;Matthew S. Landis;Gary A. Norris;Emily M. Christianson

  • Atmospheric mercury in the Lake Michigan basin: influence of the Chicago/Gary urban area.

    Matthew S. Landis;and Alan F. Vette;Gerald J. Keeler

  • Gaseous elemental mercury in the marine boundary layer: evidence for rapid removal in anthropogenic pollution.

    Peter Weiss-Penzias;Daniel A. Jaffe;Anna Mcclintick;Eric M. Prestbo

  • FORMATION OF REACTIVE GASEOUS MERCURY IN THE ARCTIC: EVIDENCE OF OXIDATION OF Hg ◦ TO GAS-PHASE Hg-II COMPOUNDS AFTER ARCTIC SUNRISE

    S. E. Lindberg;S. Brooks;C-J. Lin;K. Scott

  • Personal exposures to PM2.5 mass and trace elements in Baltimore, MD, USA

    Matthew S Landis;Gary A Norris;Ronald W Williams;Jason P Weinstein

  • The use of Pb, Sr, and Hg isotopes in Great Lakes precipitation as a tool for pollution source attribution

    Laura S. Sherman;Joel D. Blum;J. Timothy Dvonch;Lynne E. Gratz

  • Critical Evaluation of a Modified Automatic Wet-Only Precipitation Collector for Mercury and Trace Element Determinations

    Matthew S. Landis;Gerald J. Keeler

  • Source apportionment of ambient fine and coarse particulate matter at the Fort McKay community site, in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region, Alberta, Canada.

    Matthew S. Landis;J. Patrick Pancras;Joseph R. Graney;Emily M. White

  • Impacts of a large boreal wildfire on ground level atmospheric concentrations of PAHs, VOCs and ozone.

    Gregory R. Wentworth;Yayne-abeba Aklilu;Matthew S. Landis;Yu-Mei Hsu

  • Individual particle analysis of indoor, outdoor, and community samples from the 1998 Baltimore particulate matter study

    Teri L Conner;Gary A Norris;Matthew S Landis;Ronald W Williams

  • Reactive mercury in the troposphere: Model formation and results for Florida, the northeastern United States, and the Atlantic Ocean

    Sanford Sillman;Frank J. Marsik;Khalid I. Al-Wali;Gerald J. Keeler

  • Receptor modeling of ambient and personal exposure samples: 1998 Baltimore Particulate Matter Epidemiology-Exposure Study

    Philip K Hopke;Ziad Ramadan;Pentti Paatero;Gary A Norris

  • Divalent inorganic reactive gaseous mercury emissions from a mercury cell chlor-alkali plant and its impact on near-field atmospheric dry deposition

    Matthew S. Landis;Gerald J. Keeler;Khalid I. Al-Wali;Robert K. Stevens

  • The impact of the 2016 Fort McMurray Horse River Wildfire on ambient air pollution levels in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region, Alberta, Canada.

    Matthew S. Landis;Eric S. Edgerton;Emily M. White;Gregory R. Wentworth

  • Fluxes of reactive gaseous mercury measured with a newly developed method using relaxed eddy accumulation

    Henrik Skov;Steven B. Brooks;Michael E. Goodsite;Steve E. Lindberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert K. Stevens
Robert K. Stevens Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Gerald J. Keeler
Gerald J. Keeler University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Eric S. Edgerton
Eric S. Edgerton Durham University
Kevin E. Percy
Kevin E. Percy K.E. Percy Air Quality Effects Consulting Ltd
J. Timothy Dvonch
J. Timothy Dvonch University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Francesca Sprovieri
Francesca Sprovieri University of Calabria
Nicola Pirrone
Nicola Pirrone National Research Council (CNR)
M. Ian Gilmour
M. Ian Gilmour Environmental Protection Agency
Aurélien Dommergue
Aurélien Dommergue Grenoble Alpes University
Sagar V. Krupa
Sagar V. Krupa University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths that often intersect with other disciplines. For instance, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are crucial in environmental research and management. Pursuing one of the best GIS graduate programs helps students gain advanced skills in spatial data analysis, enhancing their ability to tackle environmental challenges.

Environmental professionals also benefit from public policy and administration knowledge. Enrolling in the best online masters in public administration programs equips learners with leadership skills vital for influencing environmental regulations and community initiatives.

Understanding human behavior and societal trends is essential for effective environmental advocacy. Online study options like a sociology bachelor degree online provide valuable insights into social dynamics, helping graduates design sustainable solutions aligned with community needs.

For those interested in advancing into educational roles, online doctoral studies such as online Ed D programs without dissertation requirement offer flexible pathways to leadership positions in environmental education and research without the traditional dissertation workload.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew S. Landis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles