World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
45
Citations
8141
World Ranking
6376
National Ranking
2297

Robert K. Stevens publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert K. Stevens sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 139 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Robert K. Stevens D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert K. Stevens sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1969 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • 1963 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Robert K. Stevens is affiliated with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection in the United States. Their career involves work related to environmental protection at a state governmental level, which may encompass research, policy implementation, and regulatory oversight.

Stevens has been recognized with two notable fellowships. In 1963, they were named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), and in 1969, a Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. These honors suggest involvement in scientific work during the mid-20th century, reflecting a professional standing acknowledged by prominent scientific organizations.

There are no records of recent papers, co-authors, or specific publication venues linked to Stevens in the provided data. Likewise, no information is available about books authored or main and subfields of study, and main research topics. Consequently, details about Stevens's scientific contributions are limited to their affiliation and recognitions.

Best Publications

  • Dynamic oxidation of gaseous mercury in the Arctic troposphere at polar sunrise.

    Steve E. Lindberg;Steve Brooks;C.-J. Lin;Karen J. Scott

  • Development and characterization of an annular denuder methodology for the measurement of divalent inorganic reactive gaseous mercury in ambient air.

    Matthew S. Landis;Robert K. Stevens;Frank Schaedlich;Eric M. Prestbo

  • Sampling and analysis of atmospheric sulfates and related species

    Robert K. Stevens;Thomas G. Dzubay;George Russwurm;Dwight Rickel

  • Direct Determination of the Phase Distributions of Semi-Volatile Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Using Annular Denuders

    Lara A. Gundel;Victor C. Lee;Kariyawasam R.R. Mahanama;Robert K. Stevens

  • Evaluation of an annular denuder/filter pack system to collect acidic aerosols and gases.

    Petros. Koutrakis;Jack M. Wolfson;James L. Slater;Michael. Brauer

  • Intercomparison of methods for sampling and analysis of atmospheric mercury species

    J Munthe;I Wängberg;N Pirrone;Å Iverfeldt

  • Ambient air analysis with dichotomous sampler and x-ray fluorescence spectrometer

    Thomas G. Dzubay;Robert K. Stevens

  • Distinguishing the Contributions of Residential Wood Combustion and Mobile Source Emissions Using Relative Concentrations of Dimethylphenanthrene Isomers

    Bruce A. Benner;Stephen A. Wise;Lloyd A. Currie;George A. Klouda

  • Visibility and aerosol composition in Houston, Texas

    Thomas G. Dzubay;Robert K. Stevens;Charles W. Lewis;Don H. Hern

  • Gas chromatography of reactive sulfur gases in air at the parts-per-billion level.

    R. K. Stevens;J. D. Mulik;A. E. O'Keeffe;K. J. Krost

  • Nitric acid measurement methods: An intercomparison

    Chester W. Spicer;James E. Howes;Thomas A. Bishop;Lesly H. Arnold

  • Stratigraphy and correlation of the Cambro-Ordovician Cow Head Group, western Newfoundland

    Unknown

  • A composite receptor method applied to Philadelphia aerosol

    Thomas G. Dzubay;Robert K. Stevens;Glen E. Gordon;Ilhan. Olmez

  • Early Paleozoic ophiolite complexes of the Newfoundland Appalachians as mantle‐oceanic crust sequences

    Unknown

  • Characterization of the aerosol in the Great Smoky Mountains.

    Robert K. Stevens;Thomas G. Dzubay;Robert W. Shaw;William A. McClenny

  • Czech Air Quality Monitoring and Receptor Modeling Study

    J. P. Pinto and;R. K. Stevens;R. D. Willis and;R. Kellogg

  • FORMATION OF REACTIVE GASEOUS MERCURY IN THE ARCTIC: EVIDENCE OF OXIDATION OF Hg ◦ TO GAS-PHASE Hg-II COMPOUNDS AFTER ARCTIC SUNRISE

    S. E. Lindberg;S. Brooks;C-J. Lin;K. Scott

  • Composition of fine particle regional sulfate component in Shenandoah Valley

    Semra G. Tuncel;Ilhan. Olmez;Josef R. Parrington;Glen E. Gordon

  • Evolution of a Lower Paleozoic Continental-Margin Carbonate Platform, Northern Canadian Appalachians

    Noel P. James;Robert K. Stevens;Christopher R. Barnes;Ian Knight

  • Use of Elemental Tracers to Source Apportion Mercury in South Florida Precipitation

    J. T. Dvonch;J. R. Graney;G. J. Keeler;R. K. Stevens

  • Contribution of woodsmoke and motor vehicle emissions to ambient aerosol mutagenicity.

    Charles W. Lewis;Ralph E. Baumgardner;Robert K. Stevens;Larry D. Claxton

  • Measurements of atmospheric nitrate and nitric acid: The denuder difference experiment

    Unknown

  • Divalent inorganic reactive gaseous mercury emissions from a mercury cell chlor-alkali plant and its impact on near-field atmospheric dry deposition

    Matthew S. Landis;Gerald J. Keeler;Khalid I. Al-Wali;Robert K. Stevens

  • An investigation of source–receptor relationships for mercury in south Florida using event precipitation data

    J.T Dvonch;J.R Graney;F.J Marsik;G.J Keeler

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew S. Landis
Matthew S. Landis Environmental Protection Agency
Gerald J. Keeler
Gerald J. Keeler University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Joseph P. Pinto
Joseph P. Pinto University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
John M. Ondov
John M. Ondov University of Maryland, College Park
William E. Wilson
William E. Wilson Environmental Protection Agency
Steve E. Lindberg
Steve E. Lindberg Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Nicola Pirrone
Nicola Pirrone National Research Council (CNR)
Francesca Sprovieri
Francesca Sprovieri University of Calabria
David B. Kittelson
David B. Kittelson University of Minnesota
Judith C. Chow
Judith C. Chow Desert Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens the door to various interdisciplinary fields and career pathways. Many students explore related programs such as geoscience, geology, and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to deepen their expertise. Pursuing an online geoscience degree offers a comprehensive understanding of earth systems, which complements environmental science studies well.

For those interested in spatial data and mapping technologies, looking into the best GIS undergraduate programs is a smart choice. These programs equip students with skills highly sought after in environmental consulting, urban planning, and natural resource management.

Many aspiring graduates also consider more flexible and affordable options. Programs listed under affordable online general studies degree can be a practical starting point for those balancing budgets and career goals without compromising quality education.

Additionally, students who want a less demanding curriculum might explore options described as the easiest bachelor's degree to get. Such pathways can still lead to rewarding roles, especially when combined with internships or certifications in environmental fields.

Best Scientists Citing Robert K. Stevens

Recently Published Articles