What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
Mark W. Paschke mainly focuses on Botany, Agronomy, Soil water, Ecology and Biomass.
His research links Horticulture with Botany.
When carried out as part of a general Horticulture research project, his work on Allelopathy is frequently linked to work in Phytotoxin, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of study.
The Agronomy study combines topics in areas such as Revegetation and Vegetation.
His Biomass research includes themes of Biosolids, Restoration ecology and Ecosystem.
His work on Bromus tectorum is typically connected to Relative species abundance as part of general Perennial plant study, connecting several disciplines of science.
His most cited work include:
- Nitrogen Availability and Old-Field Succession in a Shortgrass Steppe (185 citations)
- Metallophytes—a view from the rhizosphere (147 citations)
- Retracted: Dual role for an allelochemical: (±)‐catechin from Centaurea maculosa root exudates regulates conspecific seedling establishment (117 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Mark W. Paschke focuses on Botany, Agronomy, Ecology, Soil water and Plant community.
His Botany study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Symbiosis and Frankia.
His study in Symbiosis is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Hyperaccumulator and Rhizosphere.
He has included themes like Biosolids and Vegetation, Revegetation in his Agronomy study.
His research on Plant community also deals with topics like
- Steppe that connect with fields like Ecological succession, Dominance and Old field,
- Ecosystem which intersects with area such as Restoration ecology.
He interconnects Poaceae and Introduced species in the investigation of issues within Perennial plant.
He most often published in these fields:
- Botany (50.56%)
- Agronomy (38.20%)
- Ecology (25.84%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2020)?
- Restoration ecology (8.99%)
- Agronomy (38.20%)
- Environmental protection (4.49%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Restoration ecology, Agronomy, Environmental protection, Ecosystem services and Agroforestry are his primary areas of study.
He has researched Restoration ecology in several fields, including Ecosystem and Environmental planning.
The various areas that Mark W. Paschke examines in his Agronomy study include Ecology and Revegetation.
His Revegetation study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Native plant, Soil water, Graminoid, Plant cover and Mulch.
His studies deal with areas such as Adaptive management and Environmental resource management as well as Ecosystem services.
His Growing season research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Perennial plant, Plant community, Grassland and Seeding.
Between 2013 and 2020, his most popular works were:
- Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation in Vietnam: An exploratory analysis at the national level (50 citations)
- Optimizing seed mixture diversity and seeding rates for grassland restoration (33 citations)
- Symphyotrichum ericoides populations from seleniferous and nonseleniferous soil display striking variation in selenium accumulation. (20 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
Mark W. Paschke mostly deals with Biomass, Growing season, Agronomy, Ecology and Agroforestry.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Perennial plant, Odocoileus, Juniper, Understory and Forage in addition to Biomass.
The concepts of his Growing season study are interwoven with issues in Grassland, Seeding, Introduced species, Plant community and Revegetation.
His study in the field of Forb also crosses realms of Diversity.
His Agroforestry study combines topics in areas such as Population growth, Global issue and Sustainability.
Mark W. Paschke incorporates a variety of subjects into his writings, including Global issue, Forest transition and Forest restoration.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
