World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
36
Citations
4475
World Ranking
4929
National Ranking
1219

Mark W. Paschke publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Paschke sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 90 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Mark W. Paschke D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Paschke sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Ecosystem

Mark W. Paschke mainly focuses on Botany, Agronomy, Soil water, Ecology and Biomass. His research links Horticulture with Botany. When carried out as part of a general Horticulture research project, his work on Allelopathy is frequently linked to work in Phytotoxin, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of study.

The Agronomy study combines topics in areas such as Revegetation and Vegetation. His Biomass research includes themes of Biosolids, Restoration ecology and Ecosystem. His work on Bromus tectorum is typically connected to Relative species abundance as part of general Perennial plant study, connecting several disciplines of science.

His most cited work include:

  • Nitrogen Availability and Old-Field Succession in a Shortgrass Steppe (185 citations)
  • Metallophytes—a view from the rhizosphere (147 citations)
  • Retracted: Dual role for an allelochemical: (±)‐catechin from Centaurea maculosa root exudates regulates conspecific seedling establishment (117 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Mark W. Paschke focuses on Botany, Agronomy, Ecology, Soil water and Plant community. His Botany study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Symbiosis and Frankia. His study in Symbiosis is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Hyperaccumulator and Rhizosphere.

He has included themes like Biosolids and Vegetation, Revegetation in his Agronomy study. His research on Plant community also deals with topics like

  • Steppe that connect with fields like Ecological succession, Dominance and Old field,
  • Ecosystem which intersects with area such as Restoration ecology. He interconnects Poaceae and Introduced species in the investigation of issues within Perennial plant.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (50.56%)
  • Agronomy (38.20%)
  • Ecology (25.84%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2020)?

  • Restoration ecology (8.99%)
  • Agronomy (38.20%)
  • Environmental protection (4.49%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Restoration ecology, Agronomy, Environmental protection, Ecosystem services and Agroforestry are his primary areas of study. He has researched Restoration ecology in several fields, including Ecosystem and Environmental planning. The various areas that Mark W. Paschke examines in his Agronomy study include Ecology and Revegetation.

His Revegetation study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Native plant, Soil water, Graminoid, Plant cover and Mulch. His studies deal with areas such as Adaptive management and Environmental resource management as well as Ecosystem services. His Growing season research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Perennial plant, Plant community, Grassland and Seeding.

Between 2013 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation in Vietnam: An exploratory analysis at the national level (50 citations)
  • Optimizing seed mixture diversity and seeding rates for grassland restoration (33 citations)
  • Symphyotrichum ericoides populations from seleniferous and nonseleniferous soil display striking variation in selenium accumulation. (20 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Ecosystem

Mark W. Paschke mostly deals with Biomass, Growing season, Agronomy, Ecology and Agroforestry. The study incorporates disciplines such as Perennial plant, Odocoileus, Juniper, Understory and Forage in addition to Biomass. The concepts of his Growing season study are interwoven with issues in Grassland, Seeding, Introduced species, Plant community and Revegetation.

His study in the field of Forb also crosses realms of Diversity. His Agroforestry study combines topics in areas such as Population growth, Global issue and Sustainability. Mark W. Paschke incorporates a variety of subjects into his writings, including Global issue, Forest transition and Forest restoration.

Best Publications

  • Nitrogen Availability and Old-Field Succession in a Shortgrass Steppe

    Mark W. Paschke;Terry McLendon;Edward F. Redente

  • Metallophytes—a view from the rhizosphere

    Élan R. Alford;Elizabeth A. H. Pilon-Smits;Mark W. Paschke

  • Drivers of seedling establishment success in dryland restoration efforts.

    Nancy Shackelford;Nancy Shackelford;Gustavo B. Paterno;Gustavo B. Paterno;Daniel E. Winkler;Todd E. Erickson

  • Immobilizing nitrogen to control plant invasion

    Laura G. Perry;Dana M. Blumenthal;Thomas A. Monaco;Mark W. Paschke

  • Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation in Vietnam: An exploratory analysis at the national level

    Quy Van Khuc;Bao Quang Tran;Patrick Meyfroidt;Mark W. Paschke

  • Concentrations of the Allelochemical (±)-Catechin IN Centaurea maculosa Soils

    Laura G. Perry;Giles C. Thelen;Wendy M. Ridenour;Ragan M. Callaway

  • Filamentous fungi: the indeterminate lifestyle and microbial ecology.

    D. A. Klein;M. W. Paschke

  • Dual role for an allelochemical: (±)‐catechin from Centaurea maculosa root exudates regulates conspecific seedling establishment

    Laura G. Perry;Giles C. Thelen;Wendy M. Ridenour;Tiffany L. Weir

  • Long-term impacts of infrequent biosolids applications on chemical and microbial properties of a semi-arid rangeland soil

    Tarah S. Sullivan;Tarah S. Sullivan;Mary E. Stromberger;Mark W. Paschke;James A. Ippolito

  • Immobilization of soil nitrogen as a possible method for the restoration of sandy grassland

    K. Török;T. Szili-Kovács;M. Halassy;T. Tóth

  • Manganese toxicity thresholds for restoration grass species.

    Mark W. Paschke;Alejandro Valdecantos;Edward F. Redente

  • Optimizing seed mixture diversity and seeding rates for grassland restoration

    Stephanie Barr;Jayne L. Jonas;Mark W. Paschke

  • Screening of Grassland Plants for Restoration after Spotted Knapweed Invasion

    Laura G. Perry;Chandra Johnson;Elan R. Alford;Jorge M. Vivanco

  • Plant and soil responses to biosolids application following forest fire.

    V. F. Meyer;E. F. Redente;K. A. Barbarick;R. B. Brobst

  • Soil nitrogen mineralization in plantations of Juglans nigra interplanted with actinorhizal Elaeagnus umbellata or Alnus glutinosa

    Mark W. Paschke;Jeffrey O. Dawson;Mark B. David

  • Revegetation of roadcut slopes in Mesa Verde National Park, U.S.A.

    Mark W. Paschke;Claire DeLeo;Edward F. Redente

  • Zinc Toxicity Thresholds for Reclamation Forb Species

    Mark W. Paschke;Laura G. Perry;Edward F. Redente

  • Saprophytic fungal-bacterial biomass variations in successional communities of a semi-arid steppe ecosystem

    Donald A. Klein;T. McLendon;M. W. Paschke;E. F. Redente

  • Zinc toxicity thresholds for important reclamation grass species of the western united states

    Mark W Paschke;Edward F. Redente;David B. Levy

  • Roadside Use of Native Plants

    Mark W. Paschke

Frequent Co-Authors

Jorge M. Vivanco
Jorge M. Vivanco Colorado State University
Ragan M. Callaway
Ragan M. Callaway University of Montana
Elizabeth A. H. Pilon-Smits
Elizabeth A. H. Pilon-Smits Colorado State University
James A. Ippolito
James A. Ippolito The Ohio State University
Jeffrey O. Dawson
Jeffrey O. Dawson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Dittmar Hahn
Dittmar Hahn Texas State University
Frank R. Stermitz
Frank R. Stermitz Colorado State University
Patrick Meyfroidt
Patrick Meyfroidt Université Catholique de Louvain
Charles C. Rhoades
Charles C. Rhoades US Forest Service
Balakrishnan Prithiviraj
Balakrishnan Prithiviraj Dalhousie University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Mark W. Paschke

Trending Scientists