What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Gene
- Enzyme
- Cell membrane
Mark A. McNiven focuses on Cell biology, Dynamin, Endocytosis, GTPase and Dynamin II.
Mark A. McNiven has included themes like Invadopodium, Biochemistry and Arp2/3 complex, Actin cytoskeleton, Cytoskeleton in his Cell biology study.
His work carried out in the field of Dynamin brings together such families of science as Molecular motor, Golgi apparatus, Actin, Endocytic cycle and Internalization.
His Internalization study deals with Caveolae intersecting with Cell signaling, Caveolin 1 and Membrane protein.
His research integrates issues of Endoplasmic reticulum, GTP' and Green fluorescent protein in his study of GTPase.
His work is dedicated to discovering how Dynamin II, Secretion are connected with Membrane dynamics, EHD protein family, Alternative splicing and Microtubule and other disciplines.
His most cited work include:
- Caveolins, Liquid-Ordered Domains, and Signal Transduction (946 citations)
- Dynamin-mediated Internalization of Caveolae (664 citations)
- The Mitochondrial Protein hFis1 Regulates Mitochondrial Fission in Mammalian Cells through an Interaction with the Dynamin-Like Protein DLP1 (656 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary scientific interests are in Cell biology, Dynamin, Endocytosis, GTPase and Endocytic cycle.
The concepts of his Cell biology study are interwoven with issues in Internalization and Cortactin, Cytoskeleton.
His Cytoskeleton research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Kinesin and Microtubule.
His specific area of interest is Dynamin, where he studies Dynamin II.
His research in Endocytosis intersects with topics in Molecular biology and Caveolae.
His GTPase study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Autophagy and Lipid droplet.
He most often published in these fields:
- Cell biology (71.58%)
- Dynamin (40.53%)
- Endocytosis (17.89%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2021)?
- Cell biology (71.58%)
- Lipid droplet (9.47%)
- Cancer research (11.58%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Mark A. McNiven mostly deals with Cell biology, Lipid droplet, Cancer research, Autophagy and Internal medicine.
The various areas that he examines in his Cell biology study include Endocytic cycle, Internalization, Invadopodia and Dynamin.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Catabolism, Steatosis, Hepatocyte and Fatty liver.
His studies deal with areas such as VAV1, Cell migration, Pancreatic cancer, Signal transduction and Metastasis as well as Cancer research.
He combines subjects such as Triphosphatase and Lysosome with his study of Autophagy.
His Internal medicine research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Endocrinology and Oncology.
Between 2013 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- The small GTPase Rab7 as a central regulator of hepatocellular lipophagy. (135 citations)
- A novel Rab10-EHBP1-EHD2 complex essential for the autophagic engulfment of lipid droplets. (67 citations)
- Integrated mate-pair and RNA sequencing identifies novel, targetable gene fusions in peripheral T-cell lymphoma (62 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Gene
- Enzyme
- Cell membrane
Mark A. McNiven focuses on Lipid droplet, Cell biology, Autophagy, Cancer research and GTPase.
His study in Lipid droplet is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Endocrinology, Lipid metabolism, Hepatocyte and Fatty liver.
Mark A. McNiven has researched Cell biology in several fields, including Endocytic cycle and Triphosphatase.
His work carried out in the field of Endocytic cycle brings together such families of science as Catabolism and Small GTPase.
His Autophagy research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Computational biology and Programmed cell death.
His studies deal with areas such as Pancreatic tumor, Cell migration, CDC42, Signal transduction and Metastasis as well as Cancer research.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
