World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
74
Citations
22845
World Ranking
5526
National Ranking
427

J. Peter W. Young publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Peter W. Young sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 182 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

J. Peter W. Young D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Peter W. Young sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

J. Peter W. Young is affiliated with the University of York in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Environmental Science, with particular emphasis on Plant Science, Ecology, and Molecular Biology among other subfields.

The main topics that feature prominently in their work include:

  • Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
  • Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
  • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
  • Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies

Their publication record covers a range of scientific venues, with frequent contributions to the following journals:

  • INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Molecular Ecology Resources
  • PubMed
  • Frontiers in Plant Science

Among recent published papers authored or co-authored by J. Peter W. Young are:

  • Defining the Rhizobium leguminosarum Species Complex (2021) in Genes
  • User-friendly bioinformatics pipeline gDAT (graphical downstream analysis tool) for analysing rDNA sequences (2021) in Molecular Ecology Resources
  • Why are rhizobial symbiosis genes mobile? (2021) in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Symbiosis genes show a unique pattern of introgression and selection within a Rhizobium leguminosarum species complex (2020) in PubMed
  • MAUI-seq: Metabarcoding using amplicons with unique molecular identifiers to improve error correction (2020) in Molecular Ecology Resources

J. Peter W. Young has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Sara Moeskjær
  • Stig Uggerhøj Andersen
  • Euan K. James
  • Bryden Fields
  • Marta Maluk

Best Publications

  • The role of ecological theory in microbial ecology

    James I. Prosser;Brendan J. M. Bohannan;Tom P. Curtis;Richard J. Ellis

  • Genome of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus provides insight into the oldest plant symbiosis

    Emilie Tisserant;Mathilde Malbreil;Alan Kuo;Annegret Kohler

  • Improved PCR primers for the detection and identification of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

    Jaikoo Lee;Jaikoo Lee;Sangsun Lee;J. Peter W. Young

  • The genome of Rhizobium leguminosarum has recognizable core and accessory components

    J. Peter W. Young;Lisa C. Crossman;Andrew Wb Johnston;Nicholas R. Thomson

  • Extensive Fungal Diversity in Plant Roots

    Philippe Vandenkoornhuyse;Sandra L. Baldauf;Corinne Leyval;Jean Straczek

  • Reclassification of American Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar phaseoli type I strains as Rhizobium etli sp. nov.

    L. Segovia;J. P. W. Young;E. Martinez-Romero

  • Plant communities affect arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity and community composition in grassland microcosms

    David Johnson;David Johnson;Philippe J. Vandenkoornhuyse;Jonathan R. Leake;Lucy Gilbert

  • Molecular techniques in taxonomy

    Godfrey M. Hewitt;Andrew W. B. Johnston;J. Peter W. Young

  • Legume-Nodulating Betaproteobacteria: Diversity, Host Range, and Future Prospects

    Prasad Gyaneshwar;Ann M Hirsch;Lionel Moulin;Wen-Ming Chen

  • The transcriptome of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices (DAOM 197198) reveals functional tradeoffs in an obligate symbiont

    E. Tisserant;A. Kohler;P. Dozolme-Seddas;R. Balestrini

  • Introducing the bacterial 'chromid': not a chromosome, not a plasmid

    Peter W. Harrison;Ryan P.J. Lower;Nayoung K.D. Kim;J. Peter W. Young

  • Three phylogenetic groups of nodA and nifH genes in Sinorhizobium and Mesorhizobium isolates from leguminous trees growing in Africa and Latin America

    Kaisa Haukka;Kristina Lindström;J. Peter W. Young

  • Proposed Minimal Standards for the Description of New Genera and Species of Root- and Stem-Nodulating Bacteria

    P. H. Graham;M. J. Sadowsky;H. H. Keyser;Y. M. Barnet

  • Nonlegumes, Legumes, and Root Nodules Harbor Different Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Communities

    Tanja R. Scheublin;Karyn P. Ridgway;J. Peter W. Young;Marcel G. A. van der Heijden

  • Burkholderia species are ancient symbionts of legumes

    Cyril Bontemps;Geoffrey N. Elliott;Marcelo F. Simon;Fábio B. Dos Reis Júnior

  • Symbiosis within Symbiosis: Evolving Nitrogen-Fixing Legume Symbionts

    Philippe Remigi;Philippe Remigi;Philippe Remigi;Jun Zhu;Jun Zhu;J. Peter W. Young;Catherine Masson-Boivin;Catherine Masson-Boivin

  • The Glutamine Synthetases of Rhizobia: Phylogenetics and Evolutionary Implications

    Sarah L. Turner;J. Peter W. Young

  • Differentiation of Pseudomonas solanacearum, Pseudomonas syzygii, Pseudomonas pickettii and the Blood Disease Bacterium by partial 16S rRNA sequencing: construction of oligonucleotide primers for sensitive detection by polymerase chain reaction.

    S. E. Seal;L. A. Jackson;J. P. W. Young;M. J. Daniels

  • Active root-inhabiting microbes identified by rapid incorporation of plant-derived carbon into RNA

    Philippe Vandenkoornhuyse;Stéphane Mahé;Philip Ineson;Phil Staddon

  • Diversity and specificity of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae on wild and cultivated legumes.

    Lesley A. Mutch;J. Peter W. Young

Frequent Co-Authors

Euan K. James
Euan K. James James Hutton Institute
Janet I. Sprent
Janet I. Sprent University of Dundee
Wen-Ming Chen
Wen-Ming Chen Fudan University
En Tao Wang
En Tao Wang Instituto Politécnico Nacional
Stig Uggerhøj Andersen
Stig Uggerhøj Andersen Aarhus University
Wen Xin Chen
Wen Xin Chen China Agricultural University
Sergio Miana de Faria
Sergio Miana de Faria Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation
Marcelo F. Simon
Marcelo F. Simon Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation
Alastair Fitter
Alastair Fitter University of York
Kevin S. Gould
Kevin S. Gould Victoria University of Wellington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring Biology and Biochemistry studies in the USA, a range of related online degrees can help expand your career options. Professionals looking to advance in healthcare can consider msn to dnp online no clinicals programs, which provide a flexible pathway to a doctorate without on-site requirements.

For those interested in leadership or administrative roles, doctoral programs for healthcare administration can pave the way toward executive positions in hospitals and health organizations. If pharmacy is your interest, pharm d online programs offer an accessible route to earn an advanced degree with a clinical and scientific focus.

Additionally, those curious about physiology, fitness, and well-being can benefit from an exercise science degree online accredited program. These pathways are ideal for students who want flexibility, specialization, or leadership opportunities beyond traditional laboratory science. Online degrees in these fields can broaden your skills and help you build a dynamic and in-demand science or healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing J. Peter W. Young

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles