World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
66
Citations
19255
World Ranking
8530
National Ranking
658

Philip S. Poole publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip S. Poole sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 175 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Philip S. Poole D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip S. Poole sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip S. Poole is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily falls within the Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a strong focus on subfields such as Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Agronomy and Crop Science, Environmental Engineering, and Ecology.

The scientist's work covers several main topics including:

  • Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
  • Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
  • Nematode management and characterization studies
  • Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
  • Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Some of the recent papers associated with their research include:

  • Influence of Plant Fraction, Soil, and Plant Species on Microbiota: a Multikingdom Comparison, 2020, mBio
  • Deciphering bacterial mechanisms of root colonization, 2021, Environmental Microbiology Reports
  • Engineering rhizobacteria for sustainable agriculture, 2020, The ISME Journal
  • Lifestyle adaptations of Rhizobium from rhizosphere to symbiosis, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Optimizing Rhizobium- legume symbioses by simultaneous measurement of rhizobial competitiveness and N 2 fixation in nodules, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Frequent coauthors in Philip S. Poole's body of work include:

  • Beatriz Jorrín
  • Vinoy K. Ramachandran
  • Andrzej Tkacz
  • Raphael Ledermann
  • Timothy L. Haskett

Philip S. Poole's publications commonly appear in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Environmental Microbiology
  • Frontiers in Plant Science
  • mBio

Best Publications

  • Role of soil microorganisms in improving P nutrition of plants

    P. Gyaneshwar;G. Naresh Kumar;L. J. Parekh;P. S. Poole

  • The plant microbiome.

    Thomas R Turner;Euan K James;Philip S Poole

  • The Rules of Engagement in the Legume-Rhizobial Symbiosis

    Giles E.D. Oldroyd;Jeremy D. Murray;Philip S. Poole;J. Allan Downie

  • Transport and metabolism in legume-rhizobia symbioses

    Michael Udvardi;Philip S. Poole

  • The genome of Rhizobium leguminosarum has recognizable core and accessory components

    J. Peter W. Young;Lisa C. Crossman;Andrew Wb Johnston;Nicholas R. Thomson

  • Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation and the Challenges to Its Extension to Nonlegumes

    Florence Mus;Matthew B. Crook;Kevin Garcia;Amaya Garcia Costas

  • Amino-acid cycling drives nitrogen fixation in the legume– Rhizobium symbiosis

    Emma M. Lodwig;Arthur H.F. Hosie;Alex Bourdes;K. Findlay

  • Comparative metatranscriptomics reveals kingdom level changes in the rhizosphere microbiome of plants

    Thomas R Turner;Karunakaran Ramakrishnan;John Walshaw;Darren Heavens

  • Rhizobia: from saprophytes to endosymbionts.

    Philip Poole;Vinoy Ramachandran;Jason Terpolilli

  • Metabolic changes of rhizobia in legume nodules.

    Juergen Prell;Philip Poole

  • Stability and succession of the rhizosphere microbiota depends upon plant type and soil composition

    Andrzej Tkacz;Jitender Cheema;Govind Chandra;Alastair Grant

  • Absolute quantitation of microbiota abundance in environmental samples

    Andrzej Tkacz;Marion Hortala;Philip S. Poole

  • Metabolism of Rhizobium bacteroids

    Emma Lodwig;Philip Poole

  • Whole Genome Analyses Suggests that Burkholderia sensu lato Contains Two Additional Novel Genera (Mycetohabitans gen. nov., and Trinickia gen. nov.): Implications for the Evolution of Diazotrophy and Nodulation in the Burkholderiaceae.

    Paulina Estrada-de los Santos;Marike Palmer;Belén Chávez-Ramírez;Chrizelle Winsie Beukes

  • Nutrient sharing between symbionts.

    James White;Jurgen Prell;Euan K. James;Philip Poole

  • Understanding the holobiont: the interdependence of plants and their microbiome.

    Carmen Sánchez-Cañizares;Beatriz Jorrín;Philip S Poole;Andrzej Tkacz

  • Role of root microbiota in plant productivity.

    Andrzej Tkacz;Philip Poole

  • Involvement of a phosphate starvation inducible glucose dehydrogenase in soil phosphate solubilization by Enterobacter asburiae

    P Gyaneshwar;L.J Parekh;G Archana;P.S Poole

  • Legumes regulate Rhizobium bacteroid development and persistence by the supply of branched-chain amino acids

    J. Prell;J. P. White;A. Bourdes;S. Bunnewell

  • Adaptation of Rhizobium leguminosarum to pea, alfalfa and sugar beet rhizospheres investigated by comparative transcriptomics

    Vinoy K Ramachandran;Alison K East;Ramakrishnan Karunakaran;J Allan Downie

Frequent Co-Authors

Judith P. Armitage
Judith P. Armitage University of Oxford
J. Allan Downie
J. Allan Downie John Innes Centre
Euan K. James
Euan K. James James Hutton Institute
Andrew W. B. Johnston
Andrew W. B. Johnston University of East Anglia
John W. Peters
John W. Peters Washington State University
Giles E. D. Oldroyd
Giles E. D. Oldroyd University of Cambridge
Antonis Papachristodoulou
Antonis Papachristodoulou University of Oxford
Tim Wheeler
Tim Wheeler University of Reading
Michael K. Udvardi
Michael K. Udvardi Oak Ridge National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Philip S. Poole

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles