World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
57
Citations
16233
World Ranking
13606
National Ranking
5773

Kevin G. Peters publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin G. Peters sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 123 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Kevin G. Peters D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin G. Peters sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kevin G. Peters is affiliated with Procter & Gamble in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines within medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. The primary fields of study include Medicine with 25 publications and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology with 12 publications.

The subfields of study cover Molecular Biology, Ophthalmology, Epidemiology, Oncology, and Cancer Research. Specific topics frequently addressed in Peters's work include:

  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
  • Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts

Peters has contributed to research published in a variety of venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Translational Vision Science & Technology
  • JCI Insight
  • American Journal of Ophthalmology
  • EMBO Molecular Medicine

The scientist's recent papers include:

  • "Tie2 Activation via VE-PTP Inhibition With Razuprotafib as an Adjunct to Latanoprost in Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension" (2022) published in Translational Vision Science & Technology
  • "Tie2 activation protects against prothrombotic endothelial dysfunction in COVID-19" (2021) published in JCI Insight
  • "VE-PTP inhibition elicits eNOS phosphorylation to blunt endothelial dysfunction and hypertension in diabetes" (2020) published in Cardiovascular Research
  • "Macular and Peripapillary Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Metrics Predict Progression in Diabetic Retinopathy: A Sub-analysis of TIME-2b Study Data" (2020) published in American Journal of Ophthalmology
  • "A Small Molecule Inhibitor of VE-PTP Activates Tie2 in Schlemm's Canal Increasing Outflow Facility and Reducing Intraocular Pressure" (2020) published in Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Kevin G. Peters include Akshay Buch, Dietmar Vestweber, Mitchell Brigell, Barbara Withers, and Astrid F. Nottebaum. These collaborators have contributed to several joint publications, indicating active and recurring partnerships across the scientist's projects.

Best Publications

  • Fetal liver kinase 1 is a receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor and is selectively expressed in vascular endothelium

    T P Quinn;K G Peters;C De Vries;N Ferrara

  • Large induction of keratinocyte growth factor expression in the dermis during wound healing

    Sabine Werner;Kevin G. Peters;Michael T. Longaker;Frances Fuller-Pace

  • Two FGF receptor genes are differentially expressed in epithelial and mesenchymal tissues during limb formation and organogenesis in the mouse.

    K.G. Peters;S. Werner;G. Chen;L.T. Williams

  • Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor expression during embryogenesis and tissue repair suggests a role in endothelial differentiation and blood vessel growth

    K G Peters;C De Vries;L T Williams

  • Unique Expression Pattern of the FGF Receptor 3 Gene during Mouse Organogenesis

    Kevin Peters;David Ornitz;Sabine Werner;Lewis Williams

  • Rescue of Diabetes-Related Impairment of Angiogenesis by Intramuscular Gene Therapy with Adeno-VEGF

    Alain Rivard;Marcy Silver;Dongfen Chen;Marianne Kearney

  • Targeted expression of a dominant negative FGF receptor blocks branching morphogenesis and epithelial differentiation of the mouse lung.

    K. Peters;S. Werner;Xiang Liao;S. Wert

  • Tie2 Expression and Phosphorylation in Angiogenic and Quiescent Adult Tissues

    Adrianne L. Wong;Zishan A. Haroon;Sabine Werner;Mark W. Dewhirst

  • Point mutation of an FGF receptor abolishes phosphatidylinositol turnover and Ca2+ flux but not mitogenesis.

    Kevin G. Peters;Jacky Marie;Jacky Marie;Emily Wilson;Harlan E. Ives

  • Antiangiogenic gene therapy targeting the endothelium-specific receptor tyrosine kinase Tie2

    Pengnian Lin;Jake A. Buxton;Ann Acheson;Czeslaw Radziejewski

  • Differential splicing in the extracellular region of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 generates receptor variants with different ligand-binding specificities.

    S. Werner;D.-S. R. Duan;C. De Vries;K. G. Peters

  • Inhibition of tumor angiogenesis using a soluble receptor establishes a role for Tie2 in pathologic vascular growth.

    Pengnian Lin;Peter Polverini;Mark Dewhirst;Siqing Shan

  • Differential Expression of Tissue Factor Protein in Directional Atherectomy Specimens From Patients With Stable and Unstable Coronary Syndromes

    Brian H. Annex;Stephen M. Denning;Keith M. Channon;Michael H. Sketch

  • The zebrafish gene cloche acts upstream of a flk-1 homologue to regulate endothelial cell differentiation

    Wayne Liao;Brent W. Bisgrove;Holly Sawyer;Barbara Hug

  • Inhibition of tumor growth by targeting tumor endothelium using a soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor

    Pengnian Lin;Sabita Sankar;Si Qing Shan;Mark W. Dewhirst

  • Targeted expression of a dominant-negative FGF receptor mutant in the epidermis of transgenic mice reveals a role of FGF in keratinocyte organization and differentiation.

    S. Werner;W. Weinberg;Xiang Liao;K. G. Peters

  • Impaired Collateral Vessel Development Associated With Reduced Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in ApoE−/− Mice

    Thierry Couffinhal;Marcy Silver;Marianne Kearney;Alison Sullivan

  • Tyrosine 1101 of Tie2 Is the Major Site of Association of p85 and Is Required for Activation of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase and Akt

    Christopher D. Kontos;Thomas P. Stauffer;Wen-Pin Yang;John D. York

  • Functional significance of Tie2 signaling in the adult vasculature.

    Kevin G Peters;Christopher D Kontos;P Charles Lin;Adrianne L Wong

  • VEGF enhances pulmonary vasculogenesis and disrupts lung morphogenesis in vivo.

    Xin Zeng;Susan E. Wert;Robert Federici;Kevin G. Peters

Frequent Co-Authors

Lewis T. Williams
Lewis T. Williams University of California, San Francisco
Keith M. Channon
Keith M. Channon University of Oxford
Dietmar Vestweber
Dietmar Vestweber Max Planck Society
Mark W. Dewhirst
Mark W. Dewhirst Duke University
Peter A. Campochiaro
Peter A. Campochiaro Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Sabine Werner
Sabine Werner ETH Zurich
Didier Y. R. Stainier
Didier Y. R. Stainier Max Planck Society
Feng Wang
Feng Wang University of California, Berkeley
Jaime Escobedo
Jaime Escobedo Novartis (Switzerland)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your studies in Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to a variety of healthcare career paths. Many students now choose flexible learning by enrolling in online degree programs, making it easier to balance work and study. If you are interested in patient data and insurance claims, understanding the job outlook for medical billing and coding can help you decide if this fast-growing administrative role is right for you.

For those seeking a leadership or management role in healthcare, pursuing an online health information management degree can provide essential skills in managing patient records and health systems. If nutrition is your passion, many universities also offer the cheapest online nutrition degree programs for both current professionals and career changers.

Additionally, those interested in technology and patient care may consider online ultrasound tech programs, which combine biology fundamentals with real-world clinical skills. Exploring these online degrees can help you find a healthcare career path that fits your goals and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Kevin G. Peters

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles