World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
70
Citations
24593
World Ranking
2466
National Ranking
1166

Margaret Mallory publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaret Mallory sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 99 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Margaret Mallory D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaret Mallory sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Margaret Mallory was affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their academic career was linked to this institution, contributing to research within its environment.

While no specific papers, co-authors, or publication venues are recorded, they maintained a presence in academic research. No detailed data on recent research outputs or publication history is available, which limits a comprehensive overview of their scholarly contributions.

The scientist's main fields of study, subfields, and main research topics remain unspecified, indicating a lack of publicly accessible detailed records regarding the focus areas of their work.

Information about book publications and awards is also not present, leaving gaps in understanding the extent of their scholarly impact and recognition during their career.

Overall, the available data provides a basic reference to Margaret Mallory's association with a notable research institution but does not offer further insight into specific academic achievements, collaborations, or areas of expertise.

Best Publications

  • Dopaminergic Loss and Inclusion Body Formation in α-Synuclein Mice: Implications for Neurodegenerative Disorders

    Eliezer Masliah;Edward Rockenstein;Isaac Veinbergs;Margaret Mallory

  • High-level neuronal expression of abeta 1-42 in wild-type human amyloid protein precursor transgenic mice: synaptotoxicity without plaque formation.

    Lennart Mucke;Eliezer Masliah;Gui-Qiu Yu;Margaret Mallory

  • α-Synuclein Promotes Mitochondrial Deficit and Oxidative Stress

    Leigh J. Hsu;Yutaka Sagara;Armando Arroyo;Edward Rockenstein

  • Altered expression of synaptic proteins occurs early during progression of Alzheimer’s disease

    E. Masliah;M. Mallory;M. Alford;R. DeTeresa

  • β-Amyloid peptides enhance α-synuclein accumulation and neuronal deficits in a transgenic mouse model linking Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease

    Eliezer Masliah;Edward Rockenstein;Isaac Veinbergs;Yutaka Sagara

  • Dendritic injury is a pathological substrate for human immunodeficiency virus-related cognitive disorders. HNRC Group. The HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center.

    E Masliah;R K Heaton;T D Marcotte;R J Ellis

  • Deficient glutamate transport is associated with neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease.

    E Masliah;M Alford;R DeTeresa;M Mallory

  • Abnormal accumulation of NACP/alpha-synuclein in neurodegenerative disorders

    A Takeda;M Mallory;M Sundsmo;W Honer

  • beta-Synuclein inhibits alpha-synuclein aggregation: a possible role as an anti-parkinsonian factor.

    Makoto Hashimoto;Edward Rockenstein;Michael Mante;Margaret Mallory

  • Differential neuropathological alterations in transgenic mice expressing α-synuclein from the platelet-derived growth factor and Thy-1 promoters

    Edward Rockenstein;Margaret Mallory;Makoto Hashimoto;David Song;David Song

  • Neurodegeneration in the Central Nervous System of apoE-Deficient Mice

    Eliezer Masliah;Margaret Mallory;Nianfeng Ge;Michael Alford

  • Quantitative synaptic alterations in the human neocortex during normal aging

    E. Masliah;M. Mallory;L. Hansen;R. DeTeresa

  • Amyloidogenic role of cytokine TGF-β1 in transgenic mice and in Alzheimer's disease

    Tony Wyss-Coray;Eliezer Masliah;Margaret Mallory;Lisa McConlogue

  • Comparison of Neurodegenerative Pathology in Transgenic Mice Overexpressing V717F β-Amyloid Precursor Protein and Alzheimer’s Disease

    Eliezer Masliah;Abbyann Sisk;Margaret Mallory;Lennart Mucke

  • Synaptic and neuritic alterations during the progression of Alzheimer's disease

    E Masliah;M Mallory;L Hansen;R DeTeresa

  • Glutamate transporter alterations in Alzheimer disease are possibly associated with abnormal APP expression.

    Shi Li;Margaret Mallory;Michael Alford;Seigo Tanaka

  • Cortical Synaptic Density is Reduced in Mild to Moderate Human Immunodeficiency Virus Neurocognitive Disorder

    IP Everall;RK Heaton;TD Marcotte;RJ Ellis

  • Synaptotrophic effects of human amyloid β protein precursors in the cortex of transgenic mice

    L. Mucke;E. Masliah;W.B. Johnson;M.D. Ruppe

  • Early formation of mature amyloid-beta protein deposits in a mutant APP transgenic model depends on levels of Abeta(1-42).

    Edward Rockenstein;Margaret Mallory;Michael Mante;Abyanné Sisk

  • Diffuse plaques do not accentuate synapse loss in Alzheimer's disease.

    E Masliah;R D Terry;M Mallory;M Alford

Frequent Co-Authors

Eliezer Masliah
Eliezer Masliah National Institutes of Health
Edward Rockenstein
Edward Rockenstein University of California, San Diego
Robert D. Terry
Robert D. Terry University of California, San Diego
Lawrence A. Hansen
Lawrence A. Hansen University of California, San Diego
Lennart Mucke
Lennart Mucke University of California, San Francisco
Michael Mante
Michael Mante University of California, San Diego
Thomas D. Albright
Thomas D. Albright Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Thomas D. Marcotte
Thomas D. Marcotte University of California, San Diego
Igor Grant
Igor Grant University of California, San Diego
Ronald J. Ellis
Ronald J. Ellis University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying neuroscience, exploring related online degrees can open up various career pathways in mental health, counseling, and behavioral science. Many students pursue master’s degrees in psychology, counseling, or marriage and family therapy to complement or expand their neuroscience expertise.

Accreditation is crucial when selecting a graduate program. For aspiring counselors, choosing from cacrep accredited schools ensures your degree meets professional and licensure standards. Many online counseling degree options also offer flexibility for working students.

Those interested in family dynamics might pursue affordable online mft programs (Marriage and Family Therapy), which lead to rewarding roles in therapy and social services. Cost is a significant consideration—understanding how much does masters in psychology cost can help you plan ahead and choose a program that fits your budget.

Ultimately, online degrees in these fields can enhance your neuroscience background, providing more options to make a meaningful impact in healthcare, education, or research.

Best Scientists Citing Margaret Mallory

Recently Published Articles