What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Ecology
- Ecosystem
- Agriculture
His main research concerns Hydrology, Amazon rainforest, Ecology, Canopy and Deforestation.
His work on Karst as part of general Hydrology study is frequently linked to Monitoring program, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science.
As part of one scientific family, Marcelo Zacharias Moreira deals mainly with the area of Amazon rainforest, narrowing it down to issues related to the Isotope analysis, and often Animal science, Biogeochemical cycle, Tropics and Subtropics.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Isotopes of nitrogen and δ13C in addition to Ecology.
His Canopy study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Forestry, Species diversity and Litter.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Biomass, Dry season, Tropical rainforest and Transpiration.
His most cited work include:
- The effects of partial throughfall exclusion on canopy processes, aboveground production, and biogeochemistry of an Amazon forest (312 citations)
- Uncertainty in the biomass of Amazonian forests: An example from Rondônia, Brazil (235 citations)
- Contribution of transpiration to forest ambient vapour based on isotopic measurements (150 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Marcelo Zacharias Moreira mainly investigates Ecology, Hydrology, Agronomy, Trophic level and Soil water.
His Ecology study frequently links to other fields, such as δ13C.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Throughfall, Canopy, Dry season and Meteoric water in addition to Hydrology.
His Canopy research includes elements of Amazonian and Transpiration.
The concepts of his Soil water study are interwoven with issues in Nutrient and Plant litter.
His research integrates issues of Deforestation and Litter in his study of Amazon rainforest.
He most often published in these fields:
- Ecology (35.42%)
- Hydrology (26.04%)
- Agronomy (18.75%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?
- Ecology (35.42%)
- Trophic level (13.54%)
- Environmental chemistry (13.54%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary scientific interests are in Ecology, Trophic level, Environmental chemistry, δ13C and Habitat.
Marcelo Zacharias Moreira merges Ecology with Composition in his research.
His Trophic level research includes themes of Niche, Omnivore, STREAMS, Isotope analysis and Pollution.
The various areas that he examines in his Environmental chemistry study include Phytoplankton and Amazon rainforest.
His work carried out in the field of δ13C brings together such families of science as Food processing, Pasture, Biome and Biogeochemistry.
His research in Ecosystem intersects with topics in Canopy and Biogeochemical cycle.
Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Human-modified landscapes alter mammal resource and habitat use and trophic structure (20 citations)
- Nitrogen cycling in monospecific and mixed-species plantations of Acacia mangium and Eucalyptus at 4 sites in Brazil (18 citations)
- The trophic structure of fish communities from streams in the Brazilian Cerrado under different land uses: an approach using stable isotopes (17 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Ecology
- Ecosystem
- Agriculture
His scientific interests lie mostly in Trophic level, δ15N, Agronomy, Pasture and Ecology.
His Trophic level research integrates issues from Zoology and Pollution.
His δ15N research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Drainage basin, Consumer and Wet season.
Marcelo Zacharias Moreira has researched Agronomy in several fields, including Soil organic matter, Soil carbon and Soil water.
His Pasture research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of STREAMS and Land use.
Omnivore, Habitat, Habitat destruction, Ecological niche and Isotope analysis are among the areas of Ecology where Marcelo Zacharias Moreira concentrates his study.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
