World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Leonard A. Herzenberg

Leonard A. Herzenberg

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
118
Citations
50031
World Ranking
281
National Ranking
166

Leonard A. Herzenberg publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leonard A. Herzenberg sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 301 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Leonard A. Herzenberg D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leonard A. Herzenberg sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 118 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1998 - AAI Lifetime Achievement Award, American Association of Immunologists
  • 1987 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1986 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation
  • 1982 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 1976 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

Leonard A. Herzenberg was an academic researcher affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Throughout their career, they contributed to scientific knowledge primarily in the context of their research associations at this institution.

Herzenberg's career included recognition by various prestigious organizations. They were awarded the AAI Lifetime Achievement Award by the American Association of Immunologists in 1998. Earlier honors included becoming a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1987, and being a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation twice, first in 1976 and then again in 1986. Additionally, they were elected as a Member of the National Academy of Sciences in 1982.

These distinctions trace a timeline of acknowledged contributions to their field over several decades.

Best Publications

  • Xenogeneic monoclonal antibodies to mouse lymphoid differentiation antigens.

    Jeffrey A. Ledbetter;Leonard A. Herzenberg

  • Gene transfer and molecular cloning of the rat nerve growth factor receptor.

    Monte J. Radeke;Thomas P. Misko;Charles Hsu;Leonard A. Herzenberg

  • Methods and transformed mammalian lymphocytic cells for producing functional antigen-binding protein including chimeric immunoglobulin and fragments

    Morrison Sherie L;Herzenberg Leonard A;Oi Vernon T

  • Disruption of overlapping transcripts in the ROSA βgeo 26 gene trap strain leads to widespread expression of β-galactosidase in mouse embryos and hematopoietic cells

    Brian P. Zambrowicz;Akira Imamoto;Steve Fiering;Leonard A. Herzenberg

  • CHIMERIC RECEPTORS EG ANTIBODIES BY GENETIC ENGINEERING

    Morrison Sherie L;Herzenberg Leonard A;Oi Vernon T

  • Evolutionary conservation of surface molecules that distinguish T lymphocyte helper/inducer and cytotoxic/suppressor subpopulations in mouse and man

    JA Ledbetter;RL Evans;M Lipinski;C Cummingham-Rundles

  • Two distinct signal transmission pathways in T lymphocytes are inhibited by complexes formed between an immunophilin and either FK506 or rapamycin.

    B E Bierer;P S Mattila;R F Standaert;L A Herzenberg

  • N-Acetylcysteine--a safe antidote for cysteine/glutathione deficiency.

    Kondala R Atkuri;John J Mantovani;Leonard A Herzenberg;Leonore A Herzenberg

  • The History and Future of the Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorter and Flow Cytometry: A View from Stanford

    Leonard A. Herzenberg;David Parks;Bita Sahaf;Omar Perez

  • The LY‐1B Cell Lineage

    Leonore A. Herzenberg;Alan M. Stall;Paul A. Lalor;Charles Sidman

  • Two physically, functionally, and developmentally distinct peritoneal macrophage subsets

    Eliver Eid Bou Ghosn;Alexandra A. Cassado;Gregory R. Govoni;Takeshi Fukuhara

  • Interpreting flow cytometry data: a guide for the perplexed

    Leonore A. Herzenberg;James W. Tung;Wayne A. Moore;Leonard A. Herzenberg

  • Fluorescence-activated cell analysis and sorting of viable mammalian cells based on beta-D-galactosidase activity after transduction of Escherichia coli lacZ

    Garry P. Nolan;Steven Fiering;Jean-Francois Nicolas;Leonard A. Herzenberg

  • 11-color, 13-parameter flow cytometry: Identification of human naive T cells by phenotype, function, and T-cell receptor diversity

    Stephen C. De Rosa;Leonard A. Herzenberg;Leonore A. Herzenberg;Mario Roederer

  • Antigen-specific identification and cloning of hybridomas with a fluorescence-activated cell sorter

    David R. Parks;Virginia M. Bryan;Vernon T. Oi;Leonard A. Herzenberg

  • Immunoglobulin gene expression in transformed lymphoid cells.

    Vernon T. Oi;Sherie L. Morrison;Leonard A. Herzenberg;Paul Berg

  • Cell sorting: automated separation of mammalian cells as a function of intracellular fluorescence.

    H. R. Hulett;W. A. Bonner;Janet Barrett;Leonard A. Herzenberg

  • ANALYSIS OF CELL POPULATIONS WITH A FLUORESCENCE‐ACTIVATED CELL SORTER*

    Michael R. Loken;Leonard A. Herzenberg

  • The actions of cyclosporin A and FK506 suggest a novel step in the activation of T lymphocytes

    Petri S. Mattila;Katharine S. Ullman;Steven Fiering;Elizabeth A. Emmel

  • Variable region framework differences result in decreased or increased affinity of variant anti-digoxin antibodies.

    David J. Panka;Meredith Mudgett-Hunter;David R. Parks;Lisa L. Peterson

Frequent Co-Authors

Leonore A. Herzenberg
Leonore A. Herzenberg Stanford University
Mario Roederer
Mario Roederer National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Garry P. Nolan
Garry P. Nolan Stanford University
Frank J.T. Staal
Frank J.T. Staal Leiden University Medical Center
Stephen C. De Rosa
Stephen C. De Rosa Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Pietro Ghezzi
Pietro Ghezzi Brighton and Sussex Medical School
Hugh O. McDevitt
Hugh O. McDevitt Stanford University
Richard B. Moss
Richard B. Moss Stanford University
Arne Holmgren
Arne Holmgren Karolinska Institute
Michael R. Loken
Michael R. Loken Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Molecular Biology opens doors to a wide range of career options. Many students consider expanding their expertise by exploring fields like counseling, psychology, and human services. For instance, those interested in supporting others’ well-being might look into the cheapest masters in counseling online programs. These flexible options make it easier to balance education with personal commitments.

If you’re curious about the intersection of biology and mental health, you can also explore clinical psychology masters programs online. These degrees carve a pathway toward careers in therapy or research, blending scientific grounding with clinical skills.

Molecular Biology graduates drawn to advocacy or community roles often benefit from a broader understanding of social support systems. In this case, pursuing an online degree in human services can be an excellent gateway to nonprofit and public service careers.

Lastly, for those making a career shift, especially from teaching, it’s important to know the education required to be a speech pathologist. This popular transition lets you leverage your scientific background while making a direct impact in healthcare and education.

Best Scientists Citing Leonard A. Herzenberg

Recently Published Articles