World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 91 11668 10976 5980 5535 208 33986

Kathleen R. Cho publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kathleen R. Cho between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kathleen R. Cho published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 7.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 105 publications in 2023. 16 of the 330 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 105. Peak 105 publications in 2023. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 4 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 105 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 8 publications
1982 2025

330 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kathleen R. Cho: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 2
1988 1
1989 4
1990 5
1991 4
1992 8
1993 3
1994 6
1995 10
1996 5
1997 7
1998 2
1999 3
2000 8
2001 6
2002 7
2003 6
2004 4
2005 6
2006 5
2007 6
2008 7
2009 6
2010 4
2011 6
2012 5
2013 12
2014 2
2015 11
2016 7
2017 12
2018 3
2019 9
2020 9
2021 5
2022 2
2023 105
2024 8
2025 8
Total 330
Download as CSV

Kathleen R. Cho publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathleen R. Cho sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 208 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363 208
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Kathleen R. Cho D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathleen R. Cho sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 91
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Kathleen R. Cho is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans multiple aspects of medicine, with a focus on reproductive medicine, molecular biology, obstetrics and gynecology, cancer research, and immunology.

The primary subjects of their work include:

  • Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Endometrial and cervical cancer treatments
  • Cancer mechanisms and therapy
  • Reproductive system and pregnancy
  • Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Epigenetics and DNA methylation
  • Cancer, lipids, and metabolism

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Kathleen R. Cho are:

  • Epigenetic driver mutations in ARID1A shape cancer immune phenotype and immunotherapy, 2020, published in Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • Altering the Microbiome Inhibits Tumorigenesis in a Mouse Model of Oviductal High-Grade Serous Carcinoma, 2021, published in Cancer Research
  • Metabolic collateral lethal target identification reveals MTHFD2 paralogue dependency in ovarian cancer, 2022, published in Nature Metabolism
  • Progestogen-driven B7-H4 contributes to onco-fetal immune tolerance, 2024, published in Cell
  • Menopausal hormone therapy prior to the diagnosis of ovarian cancer is associated with improved survival, 2020, published in Gynecologic Oncology

The scientist frequently publishes in these venues:

  • Clinical Cancer Research
  • Cancer Research
  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • Cancers

Frequent co-authors collaborating on their work include:

  • Yali Zhai
  • Eric R. Fearon
  • Celeste Leigh Pearce
  • Malcolm C. Pike
  • Alice W. Lee

Kathleen R. Cho has been recognized as a member of the National Academy of Medicine since 2015 and is also a member of the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • Identification of a chromosome 18q gene that is altered in colorectal cancers

    Eric R. Fearon;Kathleen R. Cho;Janice M. Nigro;Scott E. Kern

  • p53-Mediated Activation of miRNA34 Candidate Tumor-Suppressor Genes

    Guido T. Bommer;Isabelle Gerin;Ying Feng;Andrew J. Kaczorowski

  • Epigenetic silencing of TH1-type chemokines shapes tumour immunity and immunotherapy.

    Dongjun Peng;Ilona Kryczek;Nisha Nagarsheth;Lili Zhao

  • DPC4 Gene in Various Tumor Types

    Mieke Schutte;Ralph H. Hruban;Lora Hedrick;Kathleen R. Cho

  • Mutations in PTEN are frequent in endometrial carcinoma but rare in other common gynecological malignancies.

    Hironori Tashiro;Marian S. Blazes;Rong Wu;Kathleen R. Cho

  • Cervical Cancer, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

    Wui Jin Koh;Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum;Sarah Bean;Kristin Bradley

  • Frequency of homozygous deletion at p16/CDKN2 in primary human tumours

    P. Cairns;T. J. Polascik;Y. Eby;K. Tokino

  • Large-scale serial analysis of gene expression reveals genes differentially expressed in ovarian cancer.

    Colleen D. Hough;Cheryl A. Sherman-Baust;Ellen S. Pizer;F. J. Montz

  • Human papillomavirus 16 E6 expression disrupts the p53-mediated cellular response to DNA damage

    Theodore D. Kessis;Robert J. Slebos;William G. Nelson;Michael B. Kastan

  • A Transforming Growth Factor β Receptor Type II Gene Mutation Common in Colon and Gastric but Rare in Endometrial Cancers with Microsatellite Instability

    Lois L. Myeroff;Ramon Parsons;Seong Jin Kim;Lora Hedrick

  • Uterine Neoplasms, Version 1.2018: Clinical practice guidelines in oncology

    Wui Jin Koh;Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum;Sarah Bean;Kristin Bradley

  • Remodeling of the extracellular matrix through overexpression of collagen VI contributes to cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer cells

    Cheryl A. Sherman-Baust;Ashani T. Weeraratna;Leticia B.A. Rangel;Ellen S. Pizer

  • Gene expression in ovarian cancer reflects both morphology and biological behavior, distinguishing clear cell from other poor-prognosis ovarian carcinomas.

    Donald R. Schwartz;Sharon L R Kardia;Kerby A. Shedden;Rork Kuick

  • p53 gene mutations are common in uterine serous carcinoma and occur early in their pathogenesis

    Hironori Tashiro;Christina Isacson;Ross Levine;Robert J. Kurman

  • p53-dependent G1 arrest involves pRB-related proteins and is disrupted by the human papillomavirus 16 E7 oncoprotein.

    Robbert J. C. Slebos;Mann H. Lee;Beverly S. Plunkett;Theodore D. Kessis

  • ENGINEERING AN INTRACELLULAR PATHWAY FOR MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX CLASS II PRESENTATION OF ANTIGENS

    Tzyy-Choou Wu;F. G. Guarnieri;K. F. Staveley-O'carroll;R. P. Viscidi

  • Activation of AXIN2 Expression by β-Catenin-T Cell Factor A FEEDBACK REPRESSOR PATHWAY REGULATING Wnt SIGNALING

    Janet Y. Leung;Frank T. Kolligs;Rong Wu;Yali Zhai

  • Myeloid derived suppressor cells enhance stemness of cancer cells by inducing microRNA101 and suppressing the corepressor CtBP2

    Tracy X. Cui;Ilona Kryczek;Lili Zhao;Ende Zhao

  • Tight Junction Proteins Claudin-3 and Claudin-4 Are Frequently Overexpressed in Ovarian Cancer but Not in Ovarian Cystadenomas

    Leticia B A Rangel;Rachana Agarwal;Theresa D'Souza;Ellen S. Pizer

  • FGF-20 and DKK1 are transcriptional targets of β-catenin and FGF-20 is implicated in cancer and development

    Mario N Chamorro;Mario N Chamorro;Donald R Schwartz;Alin Vonica;Ali H Brivanlou

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric R. Fearon
Eric R. Fearon University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Rork Kuick
Rork Kuick University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Bert Vogelstein
Bert Vogelstein Johns Hopkins University
Thomas J. Giordano
Thomas J. Giordano University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum
Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Jonathan I. Epstein
Jonathan I. Epstein Johns Hopkins University
Patricia J. Eifel
Patricia J. Eifel The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Brigitte M. Ronnett
Brigitte M. Ronnett Johns Hopkins University
David E. Cohn
David E. Cohn The Ohio State University
Sharon L.R. Kardia
Sharon L.R. Kardia University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Medical careers in the USA offer diverse pathways, many of which can be accessed or advanced through online study. Whether you’re interested in nursing, healthcare management, or specialized roles, there are flexible online options to help you achieve your goals.

For those aiming to fast-track their professional journey, you may want to explore the shortest dnp program for advanced nursing practice. If you’re looking to enter the workforce quickly, consider what is the fastest way to become an lpn and start gaining valuable clinical experience sooner.

For nurses with an interest in mental health, psych nurse practitioner programs can provide specialized, in-demand training online. Alternatively, if you’re interested in the administrative side of healthcare, you may benefit from an affordable healthcare administration degree online, which prepares graduates for management roles in a rapidly growing field.

Each of these online pathways offers varying lengths, costs, and career outcomes. Exploring your options carefully can help you choose a program that meets both your professional ambitions and your lifestyle needs.

Best Scientists Citing Kathleen R. Cho

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles