World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
40
Citations
6607
World Ranking
8047
National Ranking
2878

John R. Skalski publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John R. Skalski sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 264 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

John R. Skalski D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John R. Skalski sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

John R. Skalski is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States and conducts research primarily within the field of Environmental Science. Their work spans several subfields, including Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Water Science and Technology, Civil and Structural Engineering, and Economics and Econometrics.

The main topics addressed in their research include Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes, Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior, Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, Avian Ecology and Behavior, Economic and Environmental Valuation, and Genetic and Phenotypic Traits in Livestock.

John R. Skalski has contributed to various peer-reviewed journals. They have published multiple papers in the following venues:

  • North American Journal of Fisheries Management
  • Animal Biotelemetry
  • Wildlife Society Bulletin
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
  • PLoS ONE

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by John R. Skalski include:

  • Passage and Survival of Juvenile Salmonid Smolts through Dams in the Columbia and Snake Rivers, 2010-2018, 2020, North American Journal of Fisheries Management
  • Vitality Models Found Useful in Modeling Tag-Failure Times in Acoustic-Tag Survival Studies, 2020, Animal Biotelemetry

The researcher frequently collaborates with the following co-authors:

  • Steven L. Whitlock
  • Richard L. Townsend
  • Ryan A. Harnish
  • Kenneth D. Ham
  • Adrian Tuohy

John R. Skalski's work often focuses on understanding fish passage and survival dynamics as part of ecological and hydrological studies. Their research addresses complex environmental systems and incorporates statistical and modeling approaches to support conservation and management efforts. Notably, the papers they have published discuss topics such as juvenile salmonid smolt passage through dams and the modeling of tag-failure times in acoustic survival studies.

Best Publications

  • Wildlife demography : analysis of sex, age, and count data

    John R. Skalski;Kristen E. Ryding;Joshua J. Millspaugh

  • Estimating Survival and Migration Route Probabilities of Juvenile Chinook Salmon in the Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta

    Russell W. Perry;John R. Skalski;Patricia L. Brandes;Philip T. Sandstrom

  • Use of passive integrated transponder tags to estimate survival of migrant juvenile salmonids in the Snake and Columbia rivers

    John R. Skalski;Steven G. Smith;Robert N. Iwamoto;John G. Williams

  • Demographic Response of Mule Deer to Experimental Reduction of Coyotes and Mountain Lions in Southeastern Idaho

    Mark A. Hurley;James W. Unsworth;Peter Zager;Mark Hebblewhite

  • Survival Estimates for Migrant Yearling Chinook Salmon and Steelhead Tagged with Passive Integrated Transponders in the Lower Snake and Lower Columbia Rivers, 1993–1998

    William D. Muir;Steven G. Smith;John G. Williams;Eric E. Hockersmith

  • Effects of Sounds from a Geophysical Survey Device on Behavior of Captive Rockfish (Sebastes spp.)

    Walter H. Pearson;John R. Skalski;Charles I. Malme

  • Effects of Sounds from a Geophysical Survey Device on Catch-per-Unit-Effort in a Hook-and-Line Fishery for Rockfish (Sebastes spp.)

    John R. Skalski;Walter H. Pearson;Charles I. Malme

  • Techniques for Wildlife Investigation: Design and Analysis of Capture Data.

    S. T. Buckland;J. R. Skalski;D. S. Robson

  • Statistical models for population reconstruction using age-at-harvest data

    Nancy E. Gove;John R. Skalski;Peter Zager;Richard L. Townsend

  • Characterization of chemical waste site contamination and determination of its extent using bioassays

    J. M. Thomas;J. R. Skalski;J. F. Cline;M. C. McShane

  • Factors Associated with Travel Time and Survival of Migrant Yearling Chinook Salmon and Steelhead in the Lower Snake River

    Steven G. Smith;William D. Muir;John G. Williams;John R. Skalski

  • Quantifying Mortal Injury of Juvenile Chinook Salmon Exposed to Simulated Hydro-Turbine Passage

    Richard S. Brown;Thomas J. Carlson;Andrew J. Gingerich;John R. Stephenson

  • Techniques for wildlife investigations : design and analysis of capture data

    John R. Skalski;Douglas S. Robson

  • Determination of ecological scale

    David W. Carlile;David W. Carlile;John R. Skalski;John R. Skalski;John E. Batker;John M. Thomas

  • Estimating route-specific passage and survival probabilities at a hydroelectric project from smolt radiotelemetry studies

    John R Skalski;Richard Townsend;James Lady;Albert E Giorgi

  • Review of Marking Methods and Release-Recapture Designs for Estimating the Survival of Very Small Fish: Examples from the Assessment of Salmonid Fry Survival

    John R. Skalski;Rebecca A. Buchanan;Jim Griswold

  • Assessment of Barotrauma from Rapid Decompression of Depth-Acclimated Juvenile Chinook Salmon Bearing Radiotelemetry Transmitters

    Richard S. Brown;Thomas J. Carlson;Abigail E. Welch;John R. Stephenson

  • Multivariate regression relationships between ocean conditions and early marine survival of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch)

    Kristen E Ryding;John R Skalski

  • Effectiveness of Scat-Detection Dogs in Determining Species Presence in a Tropical Savanna Landscape

    Carly Vynne;John R. Skalski;Ricardo B. Machado;Martha J. Groom

  • Estimating in-river survival of migrating salmonid smolts using radiotelemetry

    John R. Skalski;James Lady;Richard Townsend;Albert E. Giorgi

  • An Evaluation of Sex‐Age‐Kill (SAK) Model Performance

    Joshua J. Millspaugh;John R. Skalski;Richard L. Townsend;Duane R. Diefenbach

Frequent Co-Authors

Joshua J. Millspaugh
Joshua J. Millspaugh University of Montana
Daniel D. Roby
Daniel D. Roby Oregon State University
Kristiina A. Vogt
Kristiina A. Vogt University of Washington
Christian A. Hagen
Christian A. Hagen Oregon State University
Ray Hilborn
Ray Hilborn University of Washington
Samuel K. Wasser
Samuel K. Wasser University of Washington
Hongyi Li
Hongyi Li University of Houston
Andrew B. Cooper
Andrew B. Cooper Seattle Children's Hospital
Lai-yung Ruby Leung
Lai-yung Ruby Leung Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Arthur N. Popper
Arthur N. Popper University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career pathways that often intersect with other social and behavioral sciences. For students interested in broader societal impacts and human-environment interactions, an online bachelors in sociology can complement environmental studies by providing valuable insights into social dynamics and community engagement.

For professionals aiming to advance their expertise through graduate-level education, there are flexible options such as doctorate degree online no dissertation programs. These pathways enable learners to earn advanced credentials without the traditional research burden, ideal for those balancing career and personal commitments.

Additionally, educators and environmental advocates might consider transitioning from an eds to edd programs online, which offer a streamlined route to doctoral-level qualifications focused on leadership and policy development within environmental education and related sectors.

Finally, those passionate about social work and community health can explore online dsw programs in social work. These programs equip graduates to tackle complex environmental justice issues and advocate for sustainable resource management in vulnerable populations.

Best Scientists Citing John R. Skalski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles