World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 40 8049 7735 2878 2680 264 6607

John R. Skalski publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John R. Skalski between 1979 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John R. Skalski published across 47 years, from 1979 to 2025, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2013. 1 of the 272 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2013. 1979: 2 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 3 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 11 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 16 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1979 2025

272 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John R. Skalski: publications per year, 1979 to 2025
Year Publications
1979 2
1980 0
1981 5
1982 4
1983 5
1984 2
1985 1
1986 2
1987 2
1988 0
1989 1
1990 3
1991 1
1992 11
1993 5
1994 10
1995 6
1996 6
1997 5
1998 8
1999 4
2000 7
2001 7
2002 13
2003 7
2004 1
2005 16
2006 12
2007 12
2008 8
2009 8
2010 12
2011 13
2012 13
2013 17
2014 4
2015 5
2016 8
2017 3
2018 6
2019 5
2020 4
2021 3
2022 2
2023 2
2024 0
2025 1
Total 272
Download as CSV

John R. Skalski publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John R. Skalski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–270 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 264 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181 264
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

John R. Skalski D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John R. Skalski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321 40
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

John R. Skalski is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States and conducts research primarily within the field of Environmental Science. Their work spans several subfields, including Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Water Science and Technology, Civil and Structural Engineering, and Economics and Econometrics.

The main topics addressed in their research include Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes, Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior, Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, Avian Ecology and Behavior, Economic and Environmental Valuation, and Genetic and Phenotypic Traits in Livestock.

John R. Skalski has contributed to various peer-reviewed journals. They have published multiple papers in the following venues:

  • North American Journal of Fisheries Management
  • Animal Biotelemetry
  • Wildlife Society Bulletin
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
  • PLoS ONE

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by John R. Skalski include:

  • Passage and Survival of Juvenile Salmonid Smolts through Dams in the Columbia and Snake Rivers, 2010-2018, 2020, North American Journal of Fisheries Management
  • Vitality Models Found Useful in Modeling Tag-Failure Times in Acoustic-Tag Survival Studies, 2020, Animal Biotelemetry

The researcher frequently collaborates with the following co-authors:

  • Steven L. Whitlock
  • Richard L. Townsend
  • Ryan A. Harnish
  • Kenneth D. Ham
  • Adrian Tuohy

John R. Skalski's work often focuses on understanding fish passage and survival dynamics as part of ecological and hydrological studies. Their research addresses complex environmental systems and incorporates statistical and modeling approaches to support conservation and management efforts. Notably, the papers they have published discuss topics such as juvenile salmonid smolt passage through dams and the modeling of tag-failure times in acoustic survival studies.

Best Publications

  • Wildlife demography : analysis of sex, age, and count data

    John R. Skalski;Kristen E. Ryding;Joshua J. Millspaugh

  • Estimating Survival and Migration Route Probabilities of Juvenile Chinook Salmon in the Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta

    Russell W. Perry;John R. Skalski;Patricia L. Brandes;Philip T. Sandstrom

  • Use of passive integrated transponder tags to estimate survival of migrant juvenile salmonids in the Snake and Columbia rivers

    John R. Skalski;Steven G. Smith;Robert N. Iwamoto;John G. Williams

  • Demographic Response of Mule Deer to Experimental Reduction of Coyotes and Mountain Lions in Southeastern Idaho

    Mark A. Hurley;James W. Unsworth;Peter Zager;Mark Hebblewhite

  • Survival Estimates for Migrant Yearling Chinook Salmon and Steelhead Tagged with Passive Integrated Transponders in the Lower Snake and Lower Columbia Rivers, 1993–1998

    William D. Muir;Steven G. Smith;John G. Williams;Eric E. Hockersmith

  • Effects of Sounds from a Geophysical Survey Device on Behavior of Captive Rockfish (Sebastes spp.)

    Walter H. Pearson;John R. Skalski;Charles I. Malme

  • Effects of Sounds from a Geophysical Survey Device on Catch-per-Unit-Effort in a Hook-and-Line Fishery for Rockfish (Sebastes spp.)

    John R. Skalski;Walter H. Pearson;Charles I. Malme

  • Techniques for Wildlife Investigation: Design and Analysis of Capture Data.

    S. T. Buckland;J. R. Skalski;D. S. Robson

  • Statistical models for population reconstruction using age-at-harvest data

    Nancy E. Gove;John R. Skalski;Peter Zager;Richard L. Townsend

  • Characterization of chemical waste site contamination and determination of its extent using bioassays

    J. M. Thomas;J. R. Skalski;J. F. Cline;M. C. McShane

  • Factors Associated with Travel Time and Survival of Migrant Yearling Chinook Salmon and Steelhead in the Lower Snake River

    Steven G. Smith;William D. Muir;John G. Williams;John R. Skalski

  • Quantifying Mortal Injury of Juvenile Chinook Salmon Exposed to Simulated Hydro-Turbine Passage

    Richard S. Brown;Thomas J. Carlson;Andrew J. Gingerich;John R. Stephenson

  • Techniques for wildlife investigations : design and analysis of capture data

    John R. Skalski;Douglas S. Robson

  • Determination of ecological scale

    David W. Carlile;David W. Carlile;John R. Skalski;John R. Skalski;John E. Batker;John M. Thomas

  • Estimating route-specific passage and survival probabilities at a hydroelectric project from smolt radiotelemetry studies

    John R Skalski;Richard Townsend;James Lady;Albert E Giorgi

  • Review of Marking Methods and Release-Recapture Designs for Estimating the Survival of Very Small Fish: Examples from the Assessment of Salmonid Fry Survival

    John R. Skalski;Rebecca A. Buchanan;Jim Griswold

  • Assessment of Barotrauma from Rapid Decompression of Depth-Acclimated Juvenile Chinook Salmon Bearing Radiotelemetry Transmitters

    Richard S. Brown;Thomas J. Carlson;Abigail E. Welch;John R. Stephenson

  • Multivariate regression relationships between ocean conditions and early marine survival of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch)

    Kristen E Ryding;John R Skalski

  • Effectiveness of Scat-Detection Dogs in Determining Species Presence in a Tropical Savanna Landscape

    Carly Vynne;John R. Skalski;Ricardo B. Machado;Martha J. Groom

  • Estimating in-river survival of migrating salmonid smolts using radiotelemetry

    John R. Skalski;James Lady;Richard Townsend;Albert E. Giorgi

  • An Evaluation of Sex‐Age‐Kill (SAK) Model Performance

    Joshua J. Millspaugh;John R. Skalski;Richard L. Townsend;Duane R. Diefenbach

Frequent Co-Authors

Joshua J. Millspaugh
Joshua J. Millspaugh University of Montana
Daniel D. Roby
Daniel D. Roby Oregon State University
Kristiina A. Vogt
Kristiina A. Vogt University of Washington
Christian A. Hagen
Christian A. Hagen Oregon State University
Ray Hilborn
Ray Hilborn University of Washington
Samuel K. Wasser
Samuel K. Wasser University of Washington
Hongyi Li
Hongyi Li University of Houston
Andrew B. Cooper
Andrew B. Cooper Seattle Children's Hospital
Lai-yung Ruby Leung
Lai-yung Ruby Leung Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Arthur N. Popper
Arthur N. Popper University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career pathways that often intersect with other social and behavioral sciences. For students interested in broader societal impacts and human-environment interactions, an online bachelors in sociology can complement environmental studies by providing valuable insights into social dynamics and community engagement.

For professionals aiming to advance their expertise through graduate-level education, there are flexible options such as doctorate degree online no dissertation programs. These pathways enable learners to earn advanced credentials without the traditional research burden, ideal for those balancing career and personal commitments.

Additionally, educators and environmental advocates might consider transitioning from an eds to edd programs online, which offer a streamlined route to doctoral-level qualifications focused on leadership and policy development within environmental education and related sectors.

Finally, those passionate about social work and community health can explore online dsw programs in social work. These programs equip graduates to tackle complex environmental justice issues and advocate for sustainable resource management in vulnerable populations.

Best Scientists Citing John R. Skalski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles