World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
7782
World Ranking
7257
National Ranking
3927

John M. Ivancevich publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Ivancevich sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 105 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

John M. Ivancevich D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Ivancevich sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

John M. Ivancevich was affiliated with the University of Houston in the United States during their academic career. Their research profile reflects a focus on the field of management and organizational studies, broadly situated within business disciplines.

Throughout their career, Ivancevich contributed to the academic community through various publications, although no specific papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues are listed in the available data. Their work intersected with multiple areas pertinent to organizational behavior, human resource management, and industrial relations, which are common subfields related to their primary affiliation and expertise.

The scientist's research topics likely addressed issues relevant to workplace dynamics, personnel management, and organizational effectiveness given common thematic focuses in their professional domain. Without detailed records of individual papers or citations, the specifics of these contributions remain generalized.

There is no record of awards associated with John M. Ivancevich, nor any documented book publications or collaborations with other researchers in the data provided.

Their contributions remain part of the scholarly record within business and management studies at the University of Houston. Ivancevich's career is noted to have concluded, as the data indicates the scientist is deceased.

Best Publications

  • Fundamentals of Management

    James H. Donnelly;James L. Gibson;John M. Ivancevich

  • Executive Actions For Managing Human Resources Before And After Acquisition

    David M. Schweiger;John M. Ivancevich;Frank R. Power

  • Stress and work : a managerial perspective

    John M. Ivancevich;Michael T. Matteson

  • Worksite stress management interventions.

    John M. Ivancevich;Michael T. Matteson;Sara M. Freedman;James S. Phillips

  • Punishment in Organizations: A Review, Propositions, and Research Suggestions

    Richard D. Arvey;John M. Ivancevich

  • Organisational Behaviour and Management

    J. Ivancevich;Michael T Matteson

  • Occupational stress, Type A behavior, and physical well being.

    John M. Ivancevich;Michael T. Matteson;Cynthia Preston

  • Perilaku dan manajemen organisasi

    John M. Ivancevich;Robert Konopaske;Michael T. Matteson

  • Job loss: An individual level review and model.

    Richard S DeFrank;John M Ivancevich

  • The effects of goal setting, external feedback, and self-generated feedback on outcome variables: A field experiment.

    John M. Ivancevich;J. Timothy McMahon

  • Human Resource Management, 12th ed.

    Robert Konopaske;John M Ivancevich

  • Involuntary Job Loss: Institutional Interventions and a Research Agenda

    Carrie R. Leana;John M. Ivancevich

  • Occupational stress, attitudes, and health problems in the information systems professional

    John M. Ivancevich;H. Albert Napier;James C. Wetherbe

  • Different Goal Setting Treatments and Their Effects On Performance and Job Satisfaction

    John M. Ivancevich

  • Organizational Stressors and Heart Disease: A Research Model

    Michael T. Matteson;John M. Ivancevich

  • Managerial Willingness to Assume Traveling, Short-term and Long-term Global Assignments

    Robert Konopaske;Chet Robie;John M. Ivancevich

  • Relation of Type A behavior to performance and satisfaction among sales personnel

    Michael T Matteson;John M Ivancevich;Samuel V Smith

  • A Type A-B Person-Work Environment Interaction Model for Examining Occupational Stress and Consequences

    John M. Ivancevich;Michael T. Matteson

  • Life events and hassles as predictors of health symptoms, job performance, and absenteeism

    John M. Ivancevich

  • Job Stress: From Theory to Suggestion

    John M Ivancevich;Daniel C Ganster

  • Relation of Organizational Structure to Job Satisfaction, Anxiety-Stress, and Performance.

    John M. Ivancevich;James H. Donnelly

  • Role Clarity and the Salesman: An empirical study reveals that perceived role clarity may be an important factor in maximizing a salesman's job performance.

    James H. Donnelly;John M. Ivancevich

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven J. Skinner
Steven J. Skinner University of Kentucky
Daniel C. Ganster
Daniel C. Ganster Colorado State University
James C. Wetherbe
James C. Wetherbe Texas Tech University
Richard D. Arvey
Richard D. Arvey National University of Singapore

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology in the USA unlocks a wide range of fulfilling career paths, including roles in clinical practice, counseling, research, and education. One increasingly in-demand career is substance abuse counseling. Requirements to enter this field differ by location, with most positions requiring specialized education, practical training, and often state licensure.

For example, if you are interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Durham, you’ll need a relevant degree, supervised experience, and possibly state-specific certification. Similarly, El Paso substance abuse counselors education requirements focus on formal academic qualifications and practical skills to address the complexities of addiction.

The process for how to become a substance abuse counselor in Fort Wayne also highlights the importance of ongoing professional development and licensure exams. Additionally, substance abuse counselor requirements in Fort Worth emphasize the value of ethical practice and cultural competency.

With many universities now offering online psychology degrees and counseling programs, students have flexible options for building a strong foundation toward these careers while meeting regional or national qualifications.

Best Scientists Citing John M. Ivancevich

Recently Published Articles