World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Microbiology

D-Index
55
Citations
33634
World Ranking
3761
National Ranking
334

Jim F. Huggett publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jim F. Huggett sits on this spectrum.

55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 264 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 233 scientists 205–214 publications: 207 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55 publications 679+

This scientist: 160 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

Jim F. Huggett D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jim F. Huggett sits on this spectrum.

40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 111 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 122 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 93 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jim F. Huggett is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple aspects of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with significant attention to medicine. The primary areas of focus include molecular biology, infectious diseases, biomedical engineering, epidemiology, and cancer research.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics such as molecular biology techniques and applications, SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing, biosensors and analytical detection, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research, viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology, clinical laboratory practices and quality control, and cancer genomics and diagnostics.

Frequent collaborators in their work include Denise M. O'Sullivan, Heinz Zeichhardt, Martin Kammel, Megan H. Cleveland, and Mojca Milavec. These partnerships have resulted in numerous publications across several scientific venues.

Notable publication venues where Jim F. Huggett has published include Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), Clinical Chemistry, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), SSRN Electronic Journal, and Methods.

Among recent papers contributed by Jim F. Huggett are:

  • The Digital MIQE Guidelines Update: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Digital PCR Experiments for 2020 (2020) - Clinical Chemistry
  • Discordant bioinformatic predictions of antimicrobial resistance from whole-genome sequencing data of bacterial isolates: an inter-laboratory study (2020) - Microbial Genomics
  • The Dangers of Using Cq to Quantify Nucleic Acid in Biological Samples: A Lesson From COVID-19 (2021) - Clinical Chemistry
  • Cautionary Note on Contamination of Reagents Used for Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 (2020) - Clinical Chemistry
  • STROBE-metagenomics: a STROBE extension statement to guide the reporting of metagenomics studies (2020) - The Lancet Infectious Diseases

Best Publications

  • The MIQE Guidelines: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments

    Stephen A. Bustin;Vladimir Benes;Jeremy A. Garson;Jan Hellemans

  • Real-time RT-PCR normalisation; strategies and considerations

    J Huggett;K Dheda;K Dheda;S Bustin;A Zumla

  • Validation of housekeeping genes for normalizing RNA expression in real-time PCR

    Keertan Dheda;Jim F. Huggett;Stephen A. Bustin;Margaret A. Johnson

  • The Digital MIQE Guidelines: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Digital PCR Experiments

    Jim F. Huggett;Carole A. Foy;Vladimir Benes;Kerry Emslie

  • MIQE précis: Practical implementation of minimum standard guidelines for fluorescence-based quantitative real-time PCR experiments

    Stephen A Bustin;Jean-François Beaulieu;Jim Huggett;Rolf Jaggi

  • The implications of using an inappropriate reference gene for real-time reverse transcription PCR data normalization

    K. Dheda;J.F. Huggett;J.S. Chang;L.U. Kim

  • Integrating informatics tools and portable sequencing technology for rapid detection of resistance to anti-tuberculous drugs.

    Jody E. Phelan;Denise M. O’Sullivan;Diana Machado;Jorge Ramos

  • Considerations for Digital PCR as an Accurate Molecular Diagnostic Tool

    Jim F. Huggett;Simon Cowen;Carole A. Foy

  • Comparison of microfluidic digital PCR and conventional quantitative PCR for measuring copy number variation

    Alexandra S. Whale;Jim F. Huggett;Simon Cowen;Valerie Speirs

  • Lung Remodeling in Pulmonary Tuberculosis

    Keertan Dheda;Helen Booth;Jim F. Huggett;Margaret A. Johnson

  • Towards standardisation of cell-free DNA measurement in plasma: controls for extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and quantification

    Alison S. Devonshire;Alexandra S. Whale;Alice Gutteridge;Gerwyn Jones

  • qPCR primer design revisited.

    Stephen A. Bustin;Jim Huggett

  • Differential susceptibility of PCR reactions to inhibitors: an important and unrecognised phenomenon

    Jim F Huggett;Tanya Novak;Jeremy A Garson;Clare Green

  • Accurate and rapid identification of bacterial species from positive blood cultures with a DNA-based microarray platform: an observational study

    Päivi Tissari;Alimuddin Zumla;Eveliina Tarkka;Sointu Mero

  • Fundamentals of multiplexing with digital PCR

    Alexandra S. Whale;Jim F. Huggett;Svilen Tzonev

  • Rapid and Accurate Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Sputum Samples by Cepheid Xpert MTB/RIF Assay-A Clinical Validation Study

    Andrea Rachow;Alimuddin Zumla;Norbert Heinrich;Gabriel Rojas-Ponce

  • Evaluation of Digital PCR for Absolute RNA Quantification

    Rebecca Sanders;Deborah Jane Mason;Carole A. Foy;Jim F. Huggett

  • Comparative Study of Sensitivity, Linearity, and Resistance to Inhibition of Digital and Nondigital Polymerase Chain Reaction and Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assays for Quantification of Human Cytomegalovirus

    Gavin Nixon;Jeremy A Garson;Paul Grant;Eleni Nastouli

  • Development of a highly sensitive liquid biopsy platform to detect clinically-relevant cancer mutations at low allele fractions in cell-free DNA.

    Davina Gale;Andrew R. J. Lawson;Karen Howarth;Mikidache Madi

  • Rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis through the detection of mycobacterial DNA in urine by nucleic acid amplification methods.

    Clare Green;Jim F Huggett;Elizabeth Talbot;Peter Mwaba

  • Utility of the antigen-specific interferon-gamma assay for the management of tuberculosis.

    Keertan Dheda;Zarir F. Udwadia;Jim F. Huggett;Margaret A. Johnson

Frequent Co-Authors

Alimuddin Zumla
Alimuddin Zumla University College London
Stephen A. Bustin
Stephen A. Bustin Anglia Ruskin University
Keertan Dheda
Keertan Dheda University of Cape Town
Graham A. W. Rook
Graham A. W. Rook University College London
Jeremy A. Garson
Jeremy A. Garson University College London
Jo Vandesompele
Jo Vandesompele Ghent University
Taane G. Clark
Taane G. Clark London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Michael W. Pfaffl
Michael W. Pfaffl Technical University of Munich
Vladimir Benes
Vladimir Benes European Molecular Biology Laboratory
Robert F. Miller
Robert F. Miller University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring microbiology opens doors to diverse career paths, many of which offer flexible online education options. For those interested in healthcare administration, programs like the fastest online medical billing and coding certificate programs provide a quick route to enter the medical billing field, which supports many clinical operations.

If you're considering further medical qualifications, it's important to know what medical degree can I get online to understand the scope and limitations of online healthcare education. This knowledge helps set realistic goals for your academic and career development.

Public health intersects closely with microbiology, especially in disease control and epidemiology. Many students benefit from enrolling in online MPH programs easy to get into, which offer accessible pathways to gain expertise in public health without traditional admission barriers.

Additionally, microbiology graduates interested in supporting children’s health and emotional wellbeing might explore roles highlighted by the child life specialists salary guide. This career blends medical knowledge with compassionate care, providing meaningful impact in pediatric settings.

Best Scientists Citing Jim F. Huggett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles