World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 86 14035 13216 7119 6591 490 29929

James L. Mohler publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James L. Mohler between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James L. Mohler published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 13.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 111 publications in 2023. 13 of the 628 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 111. Peak 111 publications in 2023. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 25 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 30 publications 2013: 28 publications 2014: 30 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 111 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 2 publications
1980 2025

628 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James L. Mohler: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 2
1986 2
1987 7
1988 2
1989 3
1990 5
1991 3
1992 7
1993 6
1994 8
1995 5
1996 8
1997 3
1998 10
1999 13
2000 3
2001 5
2002 9
2003 12
2004 12
2005 9
2006 9
2007 19
2008 20
2009 25
2010 16
2011 22
2012 30
2013 28
2014 30
2015 21
2016 26
2017 21
2018 26
2019 23
2020 17
2021 18
2022 18
2023 111
2024 11
2025 2
Total 628
Download as CSV

James L. Mohler publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James L. Mohler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 481–500 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 490 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713 490
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

James L. Mohler D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James L. Mohler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960 86
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

James L. Mohler is affiliated with the Roswell Park Cancer Institute in the United States. Their research spans various areas within medicine, focusing predominantly on prostate cancer and related fields.

The main fields of study for Mohler include Medicine, with specific attention to subfields such as Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Oncology, Surgery, and Cancer Research. Mohler's work is closely associated with topics involving Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research, Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism, Hormonal and reproductive studies, Global Cancer Incidence and Screening, Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer, and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life.

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Mohler cover a range of subjects related to cancer and prostate cancer in particular:

  • Microbial Biofilm: A Review on Formation, Infection, Antibiotic Resistance, Control Measures, and Innovative Treatment, 2023, Microorganisms
  • Implementation of Germline Testing for Prostate Cancer: Philadelphia Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019, 2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Cancer and Leukemia Group B 90203 (Alliance): Radical Prostatectomy With or Without Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy in Localized, High-Risk Prostate Cancer, 2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • High intratumoral CD8+ T-cell infiltration is associated with improved survival in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, 2020, The Prostate
  • Deconstructing, Addressing, and Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Inequities in Prostate Cancer Care, 2022, European Urology

Mohler has collaborated extensively with several frequent coauthors, including:

  • Jeannette T. Bensen
  • Elizabeth T. H. Fontham
  • Susan E. Steck
  • Gary J. Smith
  • Jack A. Taylor

Their publications have appeared predominantly in venues such as:

  • UNC Libraries
  • The Prostate
  • The Journal of Urology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • European Urology

Best Publications

  • Prostate cancer. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology.

    James Mohler;Robert R. Bahnson;Barry Boston;J. Erik Busby

  • Prostate Cancer, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

    James L. Mohler;Emmanuel S. Antonarakis;Andrew J. Armstrong;Anthony V. D'Amico

  • Genetic Risk and Carcinogen Exposure: a Common Inherited Defect of the Carcinogen-Metabolism Gene Glutathione S-Transferase M1 (GSTM1) That Increases Susceptibility to Bladder Cancer

    Douglas A. Bell;Jack A. Taylor;David F. Paulson;Cary N. Robertson

  • The Androgen Axis in Recurrent Prostate Cancer

    James L. Mohler;Christopher W. Gregory;O. Harris Ford;Desok Kim

  • A Mechanism for Androgen Receptor-mediated Prostate Cancer Recurrence after Androgen Deprivation Therapy

    C. W. Gregory;Bin He;R. T. Johnson;O. H. Ford

  • Androgen Receptor Stabilization in Recurrent Prostate Cancer Is Associated with Hypersensitivity to Low Androgen

    Christopher W. Gregory;Raymond T. Johnson;James L. Mohler;Frank S. French

  • Prostate Cancer, Version 1.2016

    James L. Mohler;Andrew J. Armstrong;Robert R. Bahnson;Anthony Victor D'Amico

  • Testosterone and Dihydrotestosterone Tissue Levels in Recurrent Prostate Cancer

    Mark A. Titus;Michael J. Schell;Fred B. Lih;Kenneth B. Tomer

  • The 2010 NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology on Prostate Cancer

    James L. Mohler

  • Elevation of Topoisomerase I Messenger RNA, Protein, and Catalytic Activity in Human Tumors: Demonstration of Tumor-type Specificity and Implications for Cancer Chemotherapy

    Intisar Husain;James L. Mohler;Hillard F. Seigler;Jeffrey M. Besterman

  • Dehydroepiandrosterone Activates Mutant Androgen Receptors Expressed in the Androgen-Dependent Human Prostate Cancer Xenograft CWR22 and LNCaP Cells

    Jiann An Tan;Yousuf Sharief;Katherine G. Hamil;Christopher W. Gregory

  • Association of Prostate Cancer with Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphism

    Jack A. Taylor;Ari Hirvonen;Mary Watson;Gary Pittman

  • Prostate Cancer,,Version 2.2014 Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

    James L. Mohler;Philip W. Kantoff;Andrew J. Armstrong;Robert R. Bahnson

  • Androgen Receptor Expression in Androgen-independent Prostate Cancer Is Associated with Increased Expression of Androgen-regulated Genes

    Christopher W. Gregory;Katherine G. Hamil;Desok Kim;Susan H. Hall

  • Trans-ancestry genome-wide association meta-analysis of prostate cancer identifies new susceptibility loci and informs genetic risk prediction

    David V. Conti;Burcu F. Darst;Lilit C. Moss;Edward J. Saunders

  • The 5 Alpha-Reductase Isozyme Family: A Review of Basic Biology and Their Role in Human Diseases

    Faris Azzouni;Alejandro Godoy;Yun Li;James Mohler

  • Activated Cdc42-associated kinase Ack1 promotes prostate cancer progression via androgen receptor tyrosine phosphorylation.

    Nupam P. Mahajan;Yuanbo Liu;Samarpan Majumder;Maria R. Warren

  • NCCN Guidelines Updates: Prostate Cancer and Prostate Cancer Early Detection.

    Peter H. Carroll;James L. Mohler

  • Prostate cancer early detection, Version 2.2016: Featured updates to the NCCN guidelines

    Peter R. Carroll;J. Kellogg Parsons;Gerald Andriole;Robert R. Bahnson

  • Prostate Cancer, Version 3.2012 Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines

    James L. Mohler;Andrew J. Armstrong;Robert R. Bahnson;Barry Boston

Frequent Co-Authors

Elizabeth M. Wilson
Elizabeth M. Wilson University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Eric J. Small
Eric J. Small University of California, San Francisco
James A. Eastham
James A. Eastham Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Frank S. French
Frank S. French University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Carl Morrison
Carl Morrison Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Jack A. Taylor
Jack A. Taylor National Institutes of Health
Adam S. Kibel
Adam S. Kibel Brigham and Women's Hospital
Donald L. Trump
Donald L. Trump University of Virginia
Eric A. Klein
Eric A. Klein Cleveland Clinic
Candace S. Johnson
Candace S. Johnson Roswell Park Cancer Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t always mean committing to years of medical school. There are many alternative online degrees and career pathways in healthcare that offer flexibility and a faster route to employment. For example, if you’re interested in back-office roles, you might be wondering, can you get financial aid for medical billing and coding? Many accredited online schools do provide support, making it easier to launch your career.

Nursing remains a popular option, and you might be surprised to learn that there are lpn school without teas test requirements, allowing aspiring nurses to start training without additional standardized exams. Those interested in healthcare leadership may also pursue an accelerated healthcare administration degree online for a quicker path into management positions.

Practicing nurses who want to advance their career can explore adn to fnp bridge programs to become a Family Nurse Practitioner. Online learning has unlocked a wide range of possibilities, allowing you to tailor your path and find the right fit within the booming healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing James L. Mohler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles