World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
35
Citations
7531
World Ranking
9240
National Ranking
210

Irene Cionni publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Irene Cionni sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 69 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Irene Cionni D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Irene Cionni sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Irene Cionni is affiliated with the National Agency For New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development in Italy. Their research focuses primarily on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences with an emphasis on global and planetary change as well as atmospheric science.

Their work covers several topics, including climate variability and models, meteorological phenomena and simulations, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, air quality and health impacts, climate change communication and perception, risk perception and management, and complex systems and time series analysis.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Irene Cionni include:

  • Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) v2.0 - an extended set of large-scale diagnostics for quasi-operational and comprehensive evaluation of Earth system models in CMIP, 2020, Geoscientific model development
  • Seasonal prediction of Euro-Atlantic teleconnections from multiple systems, 2020, Environmental Research Letters
  • Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) v2.0 - diagnostics for extreme events, regional and impact evaluation, and analysis of Earth system models in CMIP, 2021, Geoscientific model development
  • Independent Quality Assessment of Essential Climate Variables: Lessons Learned from the Copernicus Climate Change Service, 2022, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Predictive Skill of Teleconnection Patterns in Twentieth Century Seasonal Hindcasts and Their Relationship to Extreme Winter Temperatures in Europe, 2022, Geophysical Research Letters

Frequent co-authors working alongside Irene Cionni include:

  • Veronika Eyring
  • Mattia Righi
  • Llorenç Lledó
  • Verónica Torralba
  • Lisa Bock

Publication venues where Irene Cionni's work has appeared frequently include:

  • Geoscientific model development
  • UNC Libraries
  • Environmental Research Letters
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Geophysical Research Letters

Best Publications

  • Pre-industrial to end 21st century projections of tropospheric ozone from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP)

    P. J. Young;P. J. Young;P. J. Young;A. T. Archibald;K. W. Bowman;J.-F. Lamarque

  • Global air quality and climate

    Arlene M. Fiore;Vaishali Naik;Dominick V. Spracklen;Allison Steiner

  • Global premature mortality due to anthropogenic outdoor air pollution and the contribution of past climate change

    Raquel A. Silva;J. Jason West;Yuqiang Zhang;Susan C. Anenberg

  • Tropospheric ozone changes, radiative forcing and attribution to emissions in the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP)

    D. S. Stevenson;Paul Young;Paul Young;Paul Young;Vaishali Naik;Jean-Francois Lamarque

  • The Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP): overview and description of models, simulations and climate diagnostics

    J. F. Lamarque;Drew T. Shindell;B Josse;Paul Young;Paul Young;Paul Young

  • Preindustrial to present-day changes in tropospheric hydroxyl radical and methane lifetime from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP)

    Vaishali Naik;A. Voulgarakis;Arlene M. Fiore;L. W. Horowitz

  • Analysis of Present Day and Future OH and Methane Lifetime in the ACCMIP Simulations

    A. Voulgarakis;A. Voulgarakis;V. Naik;J.F. Lamarque;D.T. Shindell

  • Long-term ozone changes and associated climate impacts in CMIP5 simulations

    Veronika Eyring;Julie Michelle Arblaster;Julie Michelle Arblaster;Irene Cionni;Jan Sedlacek

  • Chemistry-Climate Model Simulations of Twenty- First Century Stratospheric Climate and Circulation Changes

    Neal Butchart;I. Cionni;V. Eyring;T. G. Shepherd

  • Ozone database in support of CMIP5 simulations: results and corresponding radiative forcing

    I. Cionni;V. Eyring;J. F. Lamarque;W. J. Randel

  • Multi-model assessment of stratospheric ozone return dates and ozone recovery in CCMVal-2 models

    V. Eyring;I. Cionni;G. E. Bodeker;Andrew J. Charlton-Perez

  • Multimodel climate and variability of the stratosphere

    N. Butchart;Andrew J. Charlton-Perez;I. Cionni;S. C. Hardiman

  • Stratospheric ozone response to sulfate geoengineering: Results from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)

    Giovanni Pitari;Valentina Aquila;Ben Kravitz;Alan Robock

  • Estimates of Ozone Return Dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations

    Sandip S. Dhomse;Douglas Kinnison;Martyn P. Chipperfield;Ross J. Salawitch

  • ESMValTool (v1.0) – a community diagnostic and performance metrics tool for routine evaluation of Earth system models in CMIP

    Veronika Eyring;Mattia Righi;Axel Lauer;Martin Evaldsson

  • The effect of future ambient air pollution on human premature mortality to 2100 using output from the ACCMIP model ensemble

    Raquel A. Silva;J. Jason West;Jean François Lamarque;Drew T. Shindell

  • Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) v2.0 - An extended set of large-scale diagnostics for quasi-operational and comprehensive evaluation of Earth system models in CMIP

    Veronika Eyring;Veronika Eyring;Lisa Bock;Axel Lauer;Mattia Righi

  • Technical support for European action to reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from international maritime transport

    J. Faber;A. Markowska;D. Nelissen;M. Davidson

  • Assessment of the AMS-MINNI system capabilities to simulate air quality over Italy for the calendar year 2005

    Mihaela Mircea;Luisella Ciancarella;Gino Briganti;G. Calori

  • Comparing concentration-based (AOT40) and stomatal uptake (PODY) metrics for ozone risk assessment to European forests.

    Alessandro Anav;Alessandro Anav;Alessandra De Marco;Chiara Proietti;Andrea Alessandri

Frequent Co-Authors

Veronika Eyring
Veronika Eyring University of Bremen
Paul Young
Paul Young Lancaster University
William J. Collins
William J. Collins University of Reading
Jean-Francois Lamarque
Jean-Francois Lamarque National Center for Atmospheric Research
Sarah A. Strode
Sarah A. Strode Goddard Space Flight Center
Kengo Sudo
Kengo Sudo Nagoya University
David A. Plummer
David A. Plummer Environment and Climate Change Canada
Larry W. Horowitz
Larry W. Horowitz Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory
Drew T. Shindell
Drew T. Shindell Duke University
Sophie Szopa
Sophie Szopa Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, several online degree programs offer flexible and affordable routes to build relevant expertise. Students seeking cost-effective options may explore the best affordable online general studies degree programs, which provide a broad foundation and allow for specialization in environmental subjects.

Choosing the right program is essential, especially for working professionals or those new to college. Many learners look for the easy bachelor's degree paths that still offer quality education, balancing workload with career goals in sustainability and ecology.

For students passionate about earth sciences, pursuing a geologist degree online can open doors to careers in resource management, environmental consulting, and research. These programs emphasize fieldwork skills alongside theoretical knowledge.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a critical role in environmental analysis. The best GIS programs equip students with spatial data expertise, essential for mapping, monitoring ecosystems, and supporting environmental decision-making.

Best Scientists Citing Irene Cionni

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles