World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Neuroscience
Taiwan
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 60 3771 3448 2 2 244 19326

Ching-Po Lin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ching-Po Lin between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ching-Po Lin published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 12.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2025. 74 of the 395 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2025. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 29 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 33 publications 2023: 33 publications 2024: 36 publications 2025: 38 publications
1994 2025

395 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ching-Po Lin: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 0
2003 1
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 10
2008 13
2009 11
2010 9
2011 12
2012 19
2013 15
2014 21
2015 19
2016 16
2017 11
2018 24
2019 17
2020 29
2021 26
2022 33
2023 33
2024 36
2025 38
Total 395
Download as CSV

Ching-Po Lin publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ching-Po Lin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 238–247 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 244 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203 244
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Ching-Po Lin D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ching-Po Lin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328 60
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Neuroscience in Taiwan Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Neuroscience in Taiwan Leader Award

Overview

Ching-Po Lin is affiliated with National Yang Ming University in Taiwan and has contributed extensively to research in medicine and neuroscience. Their work spans 255 publications in medicine and 174 in neuroscience, with a particular focus on subfields such as cognitive neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, psychiatry and mental health, neurology, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The scientist's research covers several main topics, including functional brain connectivity studies, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, advanced MRI techniques and applications, dementia and cognitive impairment research, neural dynamics and brain function, mental health research topics, and EEG and brain-computer interfaces.

Ching-Po Lin has authored notable papers including:

  • Connectome gradient dysfunction in major depression and its association with gene expression profiles and treatment outcomes (2022, Molecular Psychiatry)
  • Resolving heterogeneity in schizophrenia through a novel systems approach to brain structure: individualized structural covariance network analysis (2021, Molecular Psychiatry)
  • Symptom improvement in children with autism spectrum disorder following bumetanide administration is associated with decreased GABA/glutamate ratios (2020, Translational Psychiatry)
  • An extended Human Connectome Project multimodal parcellation atlas of the human cortex and subcortical areas (2021, Brain Structure and Function)
  • Extensive Cortical Connectivity of the Human Hippocampal Memory System: Beyond the "What" and "Where" Dual Stream Model (2021, Cerebral Cortex)

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Ching-Po Lin include:

  • Chu-Chung Huang
  • Qiyong Gong
  • Shih-Jen Tsai
  • Kun-Hsien Chou
  • Tianmei Si

The scientist's work has been published in several recurring venues, such as:

  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience (11 publications)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (11 publications)
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition (8 publications)
  • Translational Psychiatry (7 publications)
  • Cerebral Cortex (5 publications)

Best Publications

  • Toward discovery science of human brain function

    Bharat B. Biswal;Maarten Mennes;Xi Nian Zuo;Suril Gohel

  • Automated anatomical labelling atlas 3

    Edmund T. Rolls;Edmund T. Rolls;Chu Chung Huang;Ching Po Lin;Jianfeng Feng

  • Resolving crossing fibres using constrained spherical deconvolution: Validation using diffusion-weighted imaging phantom data

    Jacques-Donald Tournier;Chun-Hung Yeh;Fernando Calamante;Fernando Calamante;Kuan-Hung Cho

  • Expertise Modulates the Perception of Pain in Others

    Yawei Cheng;Ching Po Lin;Ho Ling Liu;Yuan Yu Hsu

  • Diffusion Tensor Tractography Reveals Abnormal Topological Organization in Structural Cortical Networks in Alzheimer's Disease

    Chun Yi Lo;Pei Ning Wang;Kun Hsien Chou;Jinhui Wang

  • Does feature selection improve classification accuracy? Impact of sample size and feature selection on classification using anatomical magnetic resonance images.

    Carlton Chu;Ai Ling Hsu;Kun Hsien Chou;Peter Bandettini

  • The perception of pain in others suppresses somatosensory oscillations: A magnetoencephalography study

    Yawei Cheng;Chia Yen Yang;Ching Po Lin;Po Lei Lee

  • Love hurts: an fMRI study.

    Yawei Cheng;Chenyi Chen;Ching Po Lin;Kun Hsien Chou

  • Medial reward and lateral non-reward orbitofrontal cortex circuits change in opposite directions in depression

    Wei Cheng;Edmund T. Rolls;Jiang Qiu;Jiang Qiu;Wei Liu;Wei Liu

  • Atypical Development of White Matter Microstructure in Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorders

    Yawei Cheng;Kun-Hsien Chou;I-Yun Chen;Yang-Teng Fan

  • Elevated expression of TDP-43 in the forebrain of mice is sufficient to cause neurological and pathological phenotypes mimicking FTLD-U

    Kuen Jer Tsai;Chun Hung Yang;Chun Hung Yang;Yen Hsin Fang;Kuan Hung Cho

  • Structural and cognitive deficits in remitting and non-remitting recurrent depression: a voxel-based morphometric study.

    Cheng Ta Li;Cheng Ta Li;Ching Po Lin;Kun Hsien Chou;I. Yun Chen

  • Connectome gradient dysfunction in major depression and its association with gene expression profiles and treatment outcomes

    Unknown

  • Gender Differences in the Mu Rhythm of the Human Mirror-Neuron System

    Yawei Cheng;Po Lei Lee;Chia Yen Yang;Ching Po Lin

  • Validation of diffusion tensor magnetic resonance axonal fiber imaging with registered manganese-enhanced optic tracts.

    Ching Po Lin;Wen Yih Isaac Tseng;Hui Cheng Cheng;Jyh Horng Chen

  • New human-specific brain landmark: The depth asymmetry of superior temporal sulcus

    François Leroy;Qing Cai;Stephanie L. Bogart;Jessica Dubois

  • Validation of diffusion spectrum magnetic resonance imaging with manganese-enhanced rat optic tracts and ex vivo phantoms.

    Ching Po Lin;Van Jay Wedeen;Jyh Horng Chen;Ching Yao

  • Probabilistic topography of human corpus callosum using cytoarchitectural parcellation and high angular resolution diffusion imaging tractography.

    Yi Ping Chao;Kuan Hung Cho;Chun Hung Yeh;Kun Hsien Chou

  • Anatomical insights into disrupted small-world networks in schizophrenia

    Qifeng Wang;Tung-Ping Su;Tung-Ping Su;Yuan Zhou;Kun-Hsien Chou

  • SEX DIFFERENCES IN THE NEUROANATOMY OF HUMAN MIRROR-NEURON SYSTEM: A VOXEL-BASED MORPHOMETRIC INVESTIGATION

    Y. Cheng;K.-H. Chou;J. Decety;I.-Y. Chen

  • Complexity of spontaneous BOLD activity in default mode network is correlated with cognitive function in normal male elderly: a multiscale entropy analysis

    Albert C. Yang;Chu Chung Huang;Heng Liang Yeh;Mu En Liu

Frequent Co-Authors

Albert C. Yang
Albert C. Yang National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Shih-Jen Tsai
Shih-Jen Tsai Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Jianfeng Feng
Jianfeng Feng Fudan University
Jong-Ling Fuh
Jong-Ling Fuh Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Chen-Jee Hong
Chen-Jee Hong Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Shuu-Jiun Wang
Shuu-Jiun Wang National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Bharat B. Biswal
Bharat B. Biswal New Jersey Institute of Technology
Edmund T. Rolls
Edmund T. Rolls University of Warwick
Jiang Qiu
Jiang Qiu Southwest University
Yung-Yang Lin
Yung-Yang Lin National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Ching-Po Lin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles