World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
67
Citations
23708
World Ranking
2157
National Ranking
1083

Peter J. Denning publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Denning sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 459 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Peter J. Denning D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Denning sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1998 - Outstanding Contribution to ACM Award For contributions to the early development of operating systems and its theory and to the core curriculum and development of computer science as a discipline.
  • 1996 - ACM Karl V. Karlstrom Outstanding Educator Award For his efforts in developing a scientific core for operating systems, in formulating a curriculum, and in elucidating Computer Science to the broader scientific community.
  • 1994 - ACM Fellow For outstanding service to ACM in many capacities over many years -- including President, Council Member, Chairman of the Editorial Committee, Editor-in-Chief of Computing Surveys and Communications of the ACM, and for notable contributions to the computing profession as an author, editor, and communicator.
  • 1989 - ACM Distinguished Service Award For outstanding service to ACM in many capacities over many years - including President, Council Member, Chairman of the Editorial Committee, Editor in Chief of Computing Surveys and Communications of the ACM, and for notable contributions to the computing profession as an author, editor and communicator.
  • 1984 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Peter J. Denning is affiliated with the Naval Postgraduate School in the United States. Their research contributions span several key areas within computer science and related disciplines. The main topics covered by their work include:

  • Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
  • Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Interconnection Networks and Systems
  • Advanced Data Storage Technologies
  • Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
  • Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Denning's publications focus on various subfields of study such as Computational Theory and Mathematics, Computer Networks and Communications, Computer Science Applications, Artificial Intelligence, and Management Science and Operations Research.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Denning include:

  • Matti Tedre
  • Ted G. Lewis
  • Jeff Johnson
  • Todd W. Lyons

The venues where Denning frequently publishes reflect their research interests and contributions. Important publication venues include:

  • Communications of the ACM
  • Ubiquity
  • Informatics in Education
  • ACM Computing Surveys
  • IEEE Annals of the History of Computing

Some of the recent papers authored by Peter J. Denning are:

  • Computational Thinking: A Disciplinary Perspective (2021) - Informatics in Education
  • Can Generative AI Bots Be Trusted? (2023) - Communications of the ACM
  • Dilemmas of Artificial Intelligence (2020) - Communications of the ACM
  • Working Set Analytics (2021) - ACM Computing Surveys
  • Computational Thinking for Professionals (2021) - Communications of the ACM

Peter J. Denning has received several awards throughout their career, recognizing their contributions to computer science. These include:

  • Outstanding Contribution to ACM Award (1998) for contributions to operating systems theory and the computer science core curriculum
  • ACM Karl V. Karlstrom Outstanding Educator Award (1996) for efforts in developing a scientific foundation for operating systems and curriculum formulation
  • ACM Fellow (1994) for extensive service to ACM and contributions as an author, editor, and communicator
  • ACM Distinguished Service Award (1989) for service including leadership roles at ACM journals and organization
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1984)

Best Publications

  • Certification of programs for secure information flow

    Dorothy E. Denning;Peter J. Denning

  • The working set model for program behavior

    Peter J. Denning

  • Operating Systems Theory

    Edward G. Coffman;Peter J. Denning

  • Computing As a Discipline

    P.J. Denning;D.E. Comer;D. Gries;M.C. Mulder

  • Virtual memory

    Peter J. Denning

  • The Operational Analysis of Queueing Network Models

    Peter J. Denning;Jeffrey P. Buzen

  • Protection: principles and practice

    G. Scott Graham;Peter J. Denning

  • Computing as a discipline

    D. E. Comer;David Gries;Michael C. Mulder;Allen Tucker

  • Working Sets Past and Present

    P.J. Denning

  • Protection - Principles and practice

    G. S. Graham;P. J. Denning

  • Remaining trouble spots with computational thinking

    Peter J. Denning

  • Principles of Optimal Page Replacement

    Alfred V. Aho;Peter J. Denning;Jeffrey D. Ullman

  • The locality principle

    Peter J. Denning

  • ACM president's letter: electronic junk

    Peter J. Denning

  • Properties of the working-set model

    Peter J. Denning;Stuart C. Schwartz

  • The profession of ITBeyond computational thinking

    Peter J. Denning

  • The long quest for computational thinking

    Matti Tedre;Peter J. Denning

  • Great Principles of Computing

    Peter J. Denning

  • Effects of scheduling on file memory operations

    Peter J. Denning

  • Thrashing: its causes and prevention

    Peter J. Denning

  • Beyond calculation: the next fifty years

    Peter J. Denning;Robert M. Metcalfe

Frequent Co-Authors

Dorothy E. Denning
Dorothy E. Denning Naval Postgraduate School
David Gries
David Gries Cornell University
Peter Wegner
Peter Wegner Brown University
Walter F. Tichy
Walter F. Tichy Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Daniel A. Menascé
Daniel A. Menascé George Mason University
Paul S. Rosenbloom
Paul S. Rosenbloom University of Southern California
Jeff Offutt
Jeff Offutt George Mason University
Jeffrey D. Ullman
Jeffrey D. Ullman Stanford University
Ravi Sandhu
Ravi Sandhu The University of Texas at San Antonio
Lawrence H. Snyder
Lawrence H. Snyder Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science education in the USA often leads students to consider various degree and career pathways. Beginning your journey at one of the community colleges near me can be a cost-effective entry point, especially if you want to build foundational skills or transfer to a four-year institution later.

For those interested in advancing their academic qualifications, specialized online programs open up even more options. An online edd program prepares students for leadership roles in educational technology, research, or administration.

Choosing the right school is crucial. Review the best online schools to ensure you gain a respected, accredited education that fits your goals and schedule.

The technology field continues to expand into creative areas as well. Earning a masters in game design online allows graduates to combine programming and artistic skills, leading to dynamic career opportunities in the gaming industry and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Peter J. Denning

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles