World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 43 1372 1285 579 529 168 42293
Economics and Finance 43 1891 1704 1099 965 158 42271

Paul M. Healy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul M. Healy between 1987 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul M. Healy published across 36 years, from 1987 to 2022, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2003. 4 of the 175 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2003. 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 2 publications
1987 2022

175 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul M. Healy: publications per year, 1987 to 2022
Year Publications
1987 2
1988 0
1989 3
1990 3
1991 0
1992 2
1993 3
1994 0
1995 3
1996 3
1997 2
1998 5
1999 9
2000 7
2001 5
2002 5
2003 13
2004 3
2005 5
2006 2
2007 7
2008 4
2009 3
2010 5
2011 12
2012 6
2013 11
2014 12
2015 10
2016 6
2017 2
2018 6
2019 4
2020 8
2021 2
2022 2
Total 175
Download as CSV

Paul M. Healy publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul M. Healy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 165–169 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 168 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61 168
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul M. Healy D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul M. Healy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69 43
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Paul M. Healy is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research primarily centers on fields within Business, Management, and Accounting, with a notable focus on subfields such as Accounting, Strategy and Management, Finance, Economics and Econometrics, and Gender Studies.

The scientist has contributed to several topics including Corporate Finance and Governance, Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance, Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting, Financial Markets and Investment Strategies, Labor Market Dynamics and Wage Inequality, and Gender Diversity and Inequality.

Recent publications by Paul M. Healy include:

  • Directors' Perceptions of Board Effectiveness and Internal Operations, 2021, Management Science
  • An Empirical Examination of Sell-Side Brokerage Analysts' Published Research, Concierge Services, and High-Touch Services, 2020, European Accounting Review
  • Determinants of Gender Differences in Change in Pay among Job-Switching Executives, 2020, Industrial and Labor Relations Review
  • Index, 2020, Stanford University Press eBooks

Frequent coauthors in their work include:

  • Boris Groysberg
  • J. Yo-Jud Cheng
  • Rajesh Vijayaraghavan
  • David A. Maber
  • Eric Lin

Paul M. Healy's publications have appeared in venues such as:

  • Management Science
  • European Accounting Review
  • Industrial and Labor Relations Review
  • Stanford University Press eBooks

Best Publications

  • Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature $

    Paul M Healy;Krishna G Palepu

  • The effects of bonus schemes on accounting decisions

    Paul M. Healy

  • A Review of the Earnings Management Literature and its Implications for Standard Setting

    Unknown

  • Stock Performance and Intermediation Changes Surrounding Sustained Increases in Disclosure

    Paul M. Healy;Amy P. Hutton;Krishna G. Palepu

  • Does corporate performance improve after mergers

    Paul M. Healy;Krishna G. Palepu;Richard S. Ruback

  • Earnings information conveyed by dividend initiations and omissions

    Paul M. Healy;Krishna G. Palepu

  • The Effect of Firms' Financial Disclosure Strategies on Stock Prices

    Krishna G. Palepu;Paul M. Healy

  • Earnings Information Conveyed by Dividend Initiations and Omissions

    Paul M. Healy;Krishna G. Palepu

  • The Fall of Enron

    Paul M. Healy;Krishna G. Palepu

  • Information Asymmetry, Corporate Disclosure and the Capital Markets: A Review of the Empirical Disclosure Literature

    Paul M. Healy;Paul M. Healy;Krishna Palepu

  • Which Types of Analyst Firms Are More Optimistic

    Amanda Paige Cowen;Boris Groysberg;Paul Healy

  • Business Analysis and Valuation : Using Financial Statements

    Krishna G Palepu;Paul M Healy;Victor L Bernard;Sue Wright

  • What Drives Sell-Side Analyst Compensation at High-Status Investment Banks?

    Boris Groysberg;Paul Murray Healy;David A. Maber

  • The effectiveness of accounting-based dividend covenants

    Paul M Healy;Krishna G Palepu

  • Earnings and Stock Splits

    Paul M. Healy;Paul Asquith;Krishna G. Palepu

  • R&D Accounting and the Tradeoff Between Relevance and Objectivity

    Paul M. Healy;Stewart C. Myers;Christopher D. Howe

  • Which Takeovers Are Profitable? Strategic or Financial?

    Paul M. Healy;Krishna G. Palepu;Richard S. Ruback

  • The challenges of investor communication The case of CUC International, Inc.

    Paul M. Healy;Krishna G. Palepu

  • Analyst Specialization and Conglomerate Stock Breakups

    Stuart C. Gilson;Paul M. Healy;Christopher F. Noe;Krishna G. Palepu

  • Earnings and Risk Changes Surrounding Primary Stock Offers

    Paul M. Healy

  • DISCUSSION OF A MARKET-BASED EVALUATION OF DISCRETIONARY ACCRUAL MODELS

    Paul Healy

Frequent Co-Authors

Krishna G. Palepu
Krishna G. Palepu Harvard University
George Serafeim
George Serafeim Harvard University
Nitin Nohria
Nitin Nohria Harvard University
Robert S. Kaplan
Robert S. Kaplan Harvard University
Thomas Z. Lys
Thomas Z. Lys Northwestern University
Scott A. Richardson
Scott A. Richardson London Business School
Paul Zarowin
Paul Zarowin New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Economics and Finance opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and diverse career opportunities. Many students expand their expertise by studying related fields, which can greatly enhance their employment prospects. For example, professionals interested in organizational dynamics often pursue one of the best hr master's programs online to deepen their knowledge of talent management and workplace strategy.

Other popular pathways include advancing communication skills, which are crucial for leadership and strategy roles. The availability of online master's programs communications allows students to specialize in areas like public relations and digital media from anywhere in the world.

For those drawn to coordinating teams or managing complex projects, enrolling in a project management online degree can lead to rewarding positions in multiple industries, including finance, consulting, and technology.

Finally, business professionals looking to accelerate their careers often consider the best one year mba programs. These condensed programs provide a fast track to advanced knowledge, leadership skills, and new opportunities in today’s competitive job market.

Best Scientists Citing Paul M. Healy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles