World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Huw C. Davies

Huw C. Davies

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
42
Citations
10795
World Ranking
7281
National Ranking
171

Huw C. Davies publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Huw C. Davies sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 113 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Huw C. Davies D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Huw C. Davies sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Huw C. Davies is affiliated with ETH Zurich in Switzerland and has contributed to the field of social sciences with a particular focus on sociology and political science, anthropology, communication, computer science applications, and gender studies. Their research encompasses a range of themes related to social and cultural dynamics, social media and politics, online learning and analytics, gender, feminism and media, youth education and societal dynamics, as well as ethics in clinical research and biomedical ethics and regulation.

Their recent publications include the following works:

  • The Mobilisation of AI in Education: A Bourdieusean Field Analysis, 2020, Sociology
  • An anatomy of the British war on woke, 2023, Race & Class
  • Governing AI-Driven Health Research: Are IRBs Up to the Task?, 2021, Ethics & Human Research
  • When public policy 'fails' and venture capital 'saves' education: Edtech investors as economic and political actors, 2023, Globalisation Societies and Education
  • PLATFORMIZING KNOWLEDGE: MESS AND MEANING IN WEB 3.0 INFRASTRUCTURES, 2020, AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Davies include:

  • Rebecca Eynon
  • Ben Williamson
  • Cory Salveson
  • Sheena Macrae
  • Phoebe Friesen

The main publication venues for Davies' work correspond with their interdisciplinary approach, including:

  • Sociology
  • Race & Class
  • Ethics & Human Research
  • Globalisation Societies and Education
  • AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research

Davies' topics of study primarily address issues within social and cultural dynamics, including the intersection of technology and society. This includes investigations into social media and political influence, the analytics of online learning environments, and the ethical dimensions surrounding clinical and biomedical research practices.

Research outputs show engagement with both theoretical and applied concerns, particularly in relation to emerging technologies such as AI in education and health research, as well as platformization in web infrastructures. Additionally, Davies' work reflects an interest in the social implications of contemporary policy debates and economic actors, such as venture capitalists involved in educational technology.

Best Publications

  • A lateral boundary formulation for multi-level prediction models

    H. C. Davies

  • A lagrangian‐based analysis of extratropical cyclones. I: The method and some applications

    By Heini Wernli;Huw C. Davies

  • A new look at the ω‐equation

    B. J. Hoskins;I. Draghici;H. C. Davies

  • Surrogate climate-change scenarios for regional climate models

    Christoph Schär;Christoph Frei;Daniel Lüthi;Huw C. Davies

  • Structure of stratospheric intrusions into the troposphere

    C. Appenzeller;H. C. Davies

  • Updating prediction models by dynamical relaxation: an examination of the technique

    H. C. Davies;R. E. Turner

  • Fragmentation of stratospheric intrusions

    C. Appenzeller;H. C. Davies;W. A. Norton

  • Heavy precipitation processes in a warmer climate

    Christoph Frei;Christoph Schär;Daniel Lüthi;Huw C. Davies

  • Limitations of Some Common Lateral Boundary Schemes used in Regional NWP Models

    Huw C. Davies

  • Heavy precipitation on the alpine southside: An upper-level precursor

    Alexia C. Massacand;Heini Wernli;Huw C. Davies

  • Perspicacious indicators of atmospheric blocking

    C. Schwierz;M. Croci-Maspoli;H. C. Davies

  • Blocking precursors to stratospheric sudden warming events

    Olivia Martius;L. M. Polvani;H. C. Davies

  • A new look at the ?-equation

    Brian J. Hoskins;Ion Draghici;Huw C. Davies

  • An event‐based jet‐stream climatology and typology

    Patrick Koch;Heini Wernli;Huw C. Davies

  • A Multifaceted Climatology of Atmospheric Blocking and Its Recent Linear Trend

    M. Croci-Maspoli;C. Schwierz;H. C. Davies

  • The Palette of Fronts and Cyclones within a Baroclinic Wave Development

    H. C. Davies;Ch Schär;H. Wernli

  • Breaking Waves at the Tropopause in the Wintertime Northern Hemisphere: Climatological Analyses of the Orientation and the Theoretical LC1/2 Classification

    Olivia Martius;C. Schwierz;H. C. Davies

  • Climate dynamics and extreme precipitation and flood events in Central Europe

    Christoph Frei;Huw C. Davies;Joachim Gurtz;Christoph Schär

  • Tropopause-Level Waveguides

    Olivia Martius;C. Schwierz;H. C. Davies

  • Eady Edge Waves and Rapid Development

    H. C. Davies;C. H. Bishop

  • Atmospheric blocking: space-time links to the NAO and PNA

    Mischa Croci-Maspoli;Cornelia Schwierz;Huw C. Davies

Frequent Co-Authors

Olivia Martius
Olivia Martius University of Bern
Heini Wernli
Heini Wernli ETH Zurich
Daniel Lüthi
Daniel Lüthi ETH Zurich
Christof Appenzeller
Christof Appenzeller Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology
Michael T. Montgomery
Michael T. Montgomery Naval Postgraduate School
Brian J. Hoskins
Brian J. Hoskins University of Reading
Adam A. Scaife
Adam A. Scaife Met Office
Masakazu Yoshimori
Masakazu Yoshimori University of Tokyo
Lorenzo M. Polvani
Lorenzo M. Polvani Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields that address today’s environmental challenges. For students interested in earth systems, pursuing one of the best online geology degree programs provides foundational knowledge in geoscience, crucial for careers in natural resource management and environmental consulting.

Another rapidly growing area is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), where spatial analysis skills are essential. The gis degree programs offer targeted training to harness mapping technology, fostering opportunities in urban planning, environmental monitoring, and disaster response.

For those looking to influence environmental policy and public administration, exploring easiest online mpa programs can be a smart choice. These programs prepare graduates for leadership roles in government and nonprofit organizations focused on sustainability and resource management.

Lastly, environmental issues are deeply influenced by social factors. An online sociology bachelor programs provide insights into human behavior and communities, enriching careers in environmental justice and advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing Huw C. Davies

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles