World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 42 7446 7154 91 89 152 6323

Helge Brattebø publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Helge Brattebø between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Helge Brattebø published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2014. 9 of the 169 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2014. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 6 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 6 publications 2025: 3 publications
1986 2025

169 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Helge Brattebø: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 1
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 1
1997 1
1998 2
1999 4
2000 2
2001 2
2002 0
2003 1
2004 1
2005 2
2006 2
2007 1
2008 6
2009 4
2010 3
2011 7
2012 8
2013 7
2014 19
2015 5
2016 16
2017 12
2018 9
2019 14
2020 12
2021 10
2022 5
2023 1
2024 6
2025 3
Total 169
Download as CSV

Helge Brattebø publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helge Brattebø sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 152 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539 152
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Helge Brattebø D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helge Brattebø sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305 42
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters Technology
  • Member of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters Technology
  • Member of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters Technology

Overview

Helge Brattebø is affiliated with the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Norway. Their research focuses primarily on the fields of engineering and environmental science, with notable contributions to subfields such as building and construction, environmental engineering, electrical and electronic engineering, industrial and manufacturing engineering, and renewable energy, sustainability, and the environment.

The main topics covered in Helge Brattebø's work include environmental impact and sustainability, building energy and comfort optimization, sustainable building design and assessment, urban transport and accessibility, sustainable supply chain management, recycling and waste management techniques, and municipal solid waste management.

Helge Brattebø has contributed to a range of publication venues, including:

  • Energy and Buildings
  • Journal of Industrial Ecology
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Resources Conservation and Recycling
  • Building and Environment

The scientist has coauthored research frequently with other scholars such as Nataša Nord, Carine Lausselet, Jan Sandstad Næss, Eirik Resch, and Nina Holck Sandberg.

A selection of recent papers authored by Helge Brattebø includes:

  • "Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method for assessing the sustainability of end-of-life alternatives for waste plastics: A case study of Norway" (2020, The Science of The Total Environment)
  • "Waste prevention, energy recovery or recycling - Directions for household food waste management in light of circular economy policy" (2020, Resources Conservation and Recycling)
  • "Temporal analysis of the material flows and embodied greenhouse gas emissions of a neighborhood building stock" (2020, Journal of Industrial Ecology)
  • "Large potentials for energy saving and greenhouse gas emission reductions from large-scale deployment of zero emission building technologies in a national building stock" (2021, Energy Policy)
  • "Estimating dynamic climate change effects of material use in buildings-Timing, uncertainty, and emission sources" (2020, Building and Environment)

Helge Brattebø is a member of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters in the technology section.

Best Publications

  • Sewage sludge disposal strategies for sustainable development

    Małgorzata Kacprzak;Ewa Neczaj;Krzysztof Fijałkowski;Anna Grobelak

  • Carbon emissions of infrastructure development.

    Daniel B. Müller;Gang Liu;Amund N. Løvik;Roja Modaresi

  • Projection of Construction and Demolition Waste in Norway

    Håvard Bergsdal;Rolf André Bohne;Helge Brattebø

  • Energy consumption, costs and environmental impacts for urban water cycle services: Case study of Oslo (Norway)

    Govindarajan Venkatesh;Helge Brattebø

  • Dynamic material flow analysis for Norway's dwelling stock

    Håvard Bergsdal;Helge Brattebø;Rolf A. Bohne;Daniel B. Müller

  • Understanding the water-energy-carbon nexus in urban water utilities: Comparison of four city case studies and the relevant influencing factors

    G. Venkatesh;Arthur Chan;Helge Brattebø

  • Sustainable management of demolition waste*/ an integrated model for the evaluation of environmental, economic and social aspects

    Anders Klang;Per-Åke Vikman;Helge Brattebø

  • Using Material Flow Analysis (MFA) to generate the evidence on plastic waste management from commercial fishing gears in Norway

    Paritosh Deshpande;Gaspard Philis;Helge Brattebø;Annik Magerholm Fet

  • Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method for assessing the sustainability of end-of-life alternatives for waste plastics: A case study of Norway.

    Paritosh C. Deshpande;Christofer Skaar;Helge Brattebø;Annik Magerholm Fet

  • Towards modelling of construction, renovation and demolition activities: Norway's dwelling stock, 1900–2100

    Igor Sartori;Håvard Bergsdal;Daniel B. Müller;Helge Brattebø

  • Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Bridges

    Johanne Hammervold;Marte Reenaas;Helge Brattebø

  • Waste prevention, energy recovery or recycling - Directions for household food waste management in light of circular economy policy

    Irmeline de Sadeleer;Helge Brattebø;Pieter Callewaert

  • Combined MFA-LCA for analysis of wastewater pipeline networks : Case study of Oslo (Norway).

    G. Venkatesh;Johanne Hammervold;Helge Brattebø

  • Temporal analysis of the material flows and embodied greenhouse gas emissions of a neighborhood building stock

    Carine Lausselet;Johana Paola Forero Urrego;Eirik Resch;Eirik Resch;Helge Brattebø

  • Phosphorus removal by granular activated alumina

    H. Brattebø;H. Ødegaard

  • Dynamic building stock modelling: General algorithm and exemplification for Norway

    Igor Sartori;Nina Holck Sandberg;Helge Brattebø

  • Large potentials for energy saving and greenhouse gas emission reductions from large-scale deployment of zero emission building technologies in a national building stock

    Nina Holck Sandberg;Nina Holck Sandberg;Jan Sandstad Næss;Helge Brattebø;Inger Andresen

  • Life cycle assessment of the water and wastewater system in Trondheim, Norway – A case study

    Helene Slagstad;Helge Brattebø

  • Using a dynamic segmented model to examine future renovation activities in the Norwegian dwelling stock

    Nina Holck Sandberg;Igor Sartori;Helge Brattebø

  • Exploring the pathway from zero-energy to zero-emission building solutions: A case study of a Norwegian office building

    Roberta Moschetti;Helge Brattebø;Magnus Sparrevik

  • Dynamic Eco-Efficiency Projections for Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Strategies at the City Level

    Rolf André Bohne;Helge Brattebø;Håvard Bergsdal

  • Ion exchange for the removal of humic acids in water treatment

    H. Brattebø;H. Ødegaard;O. Halle

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel Müller
Daniel Müller Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Zoran Kapelan
Zoran Kapelan Delft University of Technology
Elena G. Dascalaki
Elena G. Dascalaki National Observatory of Athens
Stefan Pauliuk
Stefan Pauliuk University of Freiburg
Anders Hammer Strømman
Anders Hammer Strømman Norwegian University of Science and Technology
John Krogstie
John Krogstie Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Francesco Cherubini
Francesco Cherubini Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Bal Ram Singh
Bal Ram Singh Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Christopher Kennedy
Christopher Kennedy University of Victoria
Lawrence A. Baker
Lawrence A. Baker University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to a range of interdisciplinary fields. One promising area is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which combines spatial data with environmental analysis. Exploring the best GIS programs can help students gain specialized skills applicable in environmental planning, conservation, and resource management.

For those interested in policy and administration, an online Master of Public Administration (MPA) offers pathways to leadership roles within environmental agencies and non-profits. Accessible through various online MPA degrees, these programs emphasize governance, sustainability, and community engagement.

Understanding social dynamics is also crucial in addressing environmental issues. An online sociology degree bachelors can provide insights into human behavior, societal trends, and cultural impacts on environmental policy and practices.

Finally, for education professionals aiming to enhance curriculum development without the added challenge of a dissertation, the availability of online EdD programs no dissertation can be a practical option, helping them integrate environmental themes into educational frameworks more effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Helge Brattebø

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles