World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 39 8329 7994 158 155 95 6417

Hans Blanck publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hans Blanck between 1977 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hans Blanck published across 43 years, from 1977 to 2019, averaging 2.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 1988. 2 of the 102 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 1988. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication
1977 2019

102 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hans Blanck: publications per year, 1977 to 2019
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 2
1984 3
1985 3
1986 1
1987 0
1988 7
1989 4
1990 2
1991 2
1992 4
1993 0
1994 0
1995 3
1996 6
1997 1
1998 3
1999 4
2000 2
2001 3
2002 3
2003 4
2004 3
2005 1
2006 4
2007 4
2008 2
2009 7
2010 3
2011 2
2012 3
2013 4
2014 3
2015 3
2016 3
2017 0
2018 1
2019 1
Total 102
Download as CSV

Hans Blanck publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans Blanck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 95 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440 95
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Hans Blanck D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans Blanck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275 39
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Hans Blanck is affiliated with the University of Gothenburg in Sweden. Their research predominantly lies within the field of Environmental Science, with a particular focus on Pollution and Ecology as subfields.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, including:

  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Microplastics and Plastic Pollution

A significant paper authored by Hans Blanck was published in 2020, titled "Triclosan changes community composition and selects for specific bacterial taxa in marine periphyton biofilms in low nanomolar concentrations", which appeared in the journal Ecotoxicology. This publication contributes to understanding the influence of chemical pollutants on microbial communities in marine environments.

Hans Blanck has collaborated with several frequent coauthors, including:

  • K. Martin Eriksson
  • Kemal Sanli
  • Nilsson Rickard Henrik
  • Alexander Eiler
  • Natàlia Corcoll

Ecotoxicology is noted as a frequent venue for their publications.

Best Publications

  • Joint algal toxicity of 16 dissimilarly acting chemicals is predictable by the concept of independent action.

    M Faust;R Altenburger;T Backhaus;H Blanck

  • Predicting the joint algal toxicity of multi-component s-triazine mixtures at low-effect concentrations of individual toxicants.

    M. Faust;R. Altenburger;T. Backhaus;H. Blanck

  • A Critical Review of Procedures and Approaches Used for Assessing Pollution-Induced Community Tolerance (PICT) in Biotic Communities

    Hans Blanck

  • Pollution-Induced Community Tolerance—A New Ecotoxicological Tool

    H Blanck;S-Å Wängberg;S Molander

  • Toxic effects of the antifouling agent irgarol 1051 on periphyton communities in coastal water microcosms

    Björn Dahl;Hans Blanck

  • Minimal selective concentrations of tetracycline in complex aquatic bacterial biofilms

    Sara V. Lundström;Marcus Östman;Johan Bengtsson-Palme;Carolin Rutgersson

  • Toxicity of a mixture of dissimilarly acting substances to natural algal communities: predictive power and limitations of independent action and concentration addition.

    Thomas Backhaus;Asa Arrhenius;Hans Blanck

  • Species-dependent variation in algal sensitivity to chemical compounds

    Hans Blanck;Göran Wallin;Sten-Åke Wängberg

  • Short-term toxicity of zinc to microbenthic algae and bacteria in a metal polluted stream

    W Admiraal;H Blanck;M Buckert-de Jong;H Guasch

  • Induced Community Tolerance in Marine Periphyton established under Arsenate Stress

    Hans Blanck;Sten-Åke Wängberg

  • The BEAM-project: prediction and assessment of mixture toxicities in the aquatic environment

    Thomas Backhaus;Rolf Altenburger;Åsa Arrhenius;Hans Blanck

  • Predictability of the mixture toxicity of 12 similarly acting congeneric inhibitors of photosystem II in marine periphyton and epipsammon communities.

    Åsa Arrhenius;Frederick Grönvall;Martin Scholze;Thomas Backhaus

  • Pollution-induced community tolerance (PICT) in marine periphyton in a gradient of tri-n-butyltin (TBT) contamination

    Hans Blanck;Björn Dahl

  • Use of microcapsules as controlled release devices for coatings

    Markus Andersson Trojer;Lars Nordstierna;Jonatan Bergek;Hans Blanck

  • Long-term toxicity of zinc to bacteria and algae in periphyton communities from the river Göta Älv, based on a microcosm study

    Maria Paulsson;Bo Nyström;Hans Blanck

  • Toxicity of the pharmaceutical clotrimazole to marine microalgal communities.

    Tobias Porsbring;Hans Blanck;Henrik Tjellström;Thomas Backhaus

  • Water quality objectives for mixtures of toxic chemicals: problems and perspectives.

    M Vighi;R Altenburger;Å Arrhenius;T Backhaus

  • Pollution-induced community tolerance (PICT): towards an ecologically relevant risk assessment of chemicals in aquatic systems

    Ahmed Tlili;Annette Berard;Annette Berard;Hans Blanck;Agnes Bouchez

  • Single‐substance and mixture toxicity of five pharmaceuticals and personal care products to marine periphyton communities

    Thomas Backhaus;Tobias Porsbring;Åsa Arrhenius;Sara Brosche

  • Detection of Pollution-Induced Community Tolerance (PICT) in marine periphyton communities established under diuron exposure

    Sverker Molander;Hans Blanck

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Backhaus
Thomas Backhaus University of Gothenburg
Martin Scholze
Martin Scholze Brunel University London
Magnus Nydén
Magnus Nydén University College London
Per O.J. Hall
Per O.J. Hall University of Gothenburg
Rolf Altenburger
Rolf Altenburger Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Wim Admiraal
Wim Admiraal University of Amsterdam
Sergi Sabater
Sergi Sabater University of Girona
Helena Guasch
Helena Guasch University of Girona
R. Henrik Nilsson
R. Henrik Nilsson University of Gothenburg
Jussi V. K. Kukkonen
Jussi V. K. Kukkonen University of Eastern Finland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens many doors to interdisciplinary career paths. Many professionals complement their scientific knowledge with degrees in public administration, like mpa one year programs, to gain skills in policy-making and management that are crucial for environmental governance.

Social perspectives are equally important in environmental work. Pursuing an online sociology bachelor programs can provide insight into societal behaviors and community engagement strategies, essential for sustainable development projects.

For those interested in education-focused roles, you might explore advanced qualifications that do not require a dissertation, such as education doctoral programs without dissertation. These offer practical leadership skills for implementing environmental education at various levels.

Additionally, accredited pathways for higher degrees, including accredited eds to edd programs, provide opportunities for professionals aiming to become leaders in environmental education and policy. These programs combine research and practice to drive impactful environmental change.

Best Scientists Citing Hans Blanck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles