World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
43
Citations
31851
World Ranking
1376
National Ranking
582

George P. Huber publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George P. Huber sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 88 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

George P. Huber D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George P. Huber sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute
  • Fellow of the Decision Sciences Institute

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Management
  • Sociology
  • Knowledge management

His primary areas of study are Knowledge management, Management information systems, Organizational effectiveness, Organizational architecture and Organizational change. His Knowledge management study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Outcome and Nothing. His studies in Organizational effectiveness integrate themes in fields like Contrast, Organizational studies, Organization development, Organizational learning and Economic model.

His study in the field of Organizational engineering and Organizational space also crosses realms of Research question. George P. Huber specializes in Organizational learning, namely Organizational memory. His work carried out in the field of Organizational architecture brings together such families of science as Decision theory, Decision engineering and Organizational theory.

His most cited work include:

  • Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures (6295 citations)
  • Retrospective reports of strategic‐level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy (1350 citations)
  • A Theory of the Effects of Advanced Information Technologies on Organizational Design, Intelligence, and Decision Making (1087 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

George P. Huber mostly deals with Knowledge management, Social psychology, Organizational learning, Organizational effectiveness and Sociology. George P. Huber combines subjects such as Decision engineering and R-CAST with his study of Knowledge management. His study explores the link between Social psychology and topics such as Organizational structure that cross with problems in Boundary spanning and Strategic planning.

In Organizational learning, he works on issues like Organization development, which are connected to Organizational commitment. His Organizational effectiveness research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Environmental resource management and Process management. His Strategic management study in the realm of Management connects with subjects such as Organizational processes.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Knowledge management (35.29%)
  • Social psychology (22.35%)
  • Organizational learning (17.65%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2003-2015)?

  • Social psychology (22.35%)
  • Organizational learning (17.65%)
  • Sociology (11.76%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Social psychology, Organizational learning, Sociology, Cognitive psychology and Knowledge management are his primary areas of study. George P. Huber has researched Organizational learning in several fields, including Organizational architecture, Management system, Organization development and Set. His work in the fields of Organization development, such as Organizational studies, overlaps with other areas such as Field and State.

His Cognitive psychology research focuses on Affect and how it relates to Construct, Group outcomes and Social learning. He is interested in Technology management, which is a branch of Knowledge management. His Technology management research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Function, Organizational commitment, Human resource management and Boundary spanning.

Between 2003 and 2015, his most popular works were:

  • Cross-Understanding: Implications for Group Cognition and Performance (177 citations)
  • Organizational Actions in Response to Threats and Opportunities (26 citations)
  • Challenging Organizational Change Research (18 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Management
  • Sociology
  • Social psychology

His main research concerns Social psychology, Supervisor, Orientation, Prospect theory and Lead. His research in Social psychology intersects with topics in Argument, Conditioning and Management. His Prospect theory study frequently links to related topics such as Public economics.

Best Publications

  • Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures

    George P. Huber

  • Retrospective reports of strategic‐level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy

    George P. Huber;Danial J. Power

  • Fit, Equifinality, and Organizational Effectiveness: A Test of Two Configurational Theories

    D. Harold Doty;William H. Glick;George P. Huber

  • A Theory of the Effects of Advanced Information Technologies on Organizational Design, Intelligence, and Decision Making

    George P. Huber

  • Longitudinal Field Research Methods for Studying Processes of Organizational Change

    Andrew H. van de Ven;George P. Huber

  • The Nature and Design of Post-Industrial Organizations

    George P. Huber

  • Organizational Actions in Response to Threats and Opportunities

    Prithviraj Chattopadhyay;William H. Glick;George P. Huber

  • Issues in the design of group decision support systems

    George P. Huber

  • Studying Changes in Organizational Design and Effectiveness: Retrospective Event Histories and Periodic Assessments

    William H. Glick;George P. Huber;C. Chet Miller;D. Harold Doty

  • Transfer of knowledge in knowledge management systems: unexplored issues and suggested studies

    George P. Huber

  • Cognitive Style as a Basis for MIS and DSS Designs: Much ADO About Nothing?

    George P. Huber

  • Computer support for meetings of groups working on unstructured problems: a field experiment

    Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa;V. Srinivasan Rao;George P. Huber

  • Firm and industry as determinants of executive perceptions of the environment

    Kathleen M. Sutcliffe;George P. Huber

  • Determinants of executive beliefs: comparing functional conditioning and social influence

    Prithviraj Chattopadhyay;William H. Glick;C. Chet Miller;George P. Huber

  • Functional Background as A Determinant of Executives' Selective Perception

    Mary J. Waller;George P. Huber;William H. Glick

  • The Decision-Making Paradigm of Organizational Design

    George P. Huber;Reuben R. McDaniel

  • Cross-Understanding: Implications for Group Cognition and Performance

    George P. Huber;Kyle Lewis

  • The Systems Paradigm in Organization Theory: Correcting the Record and Suggesting the Future

    Donde P. Ashmos;George P. Huber

  • The information environments of organizations.

    George P. Huber;Richard L. Daft

  • How Organizations Learn: A Communication Framework.

    Richard Daft;George Huber

  • Organizational Change and Redesign: Ideas and Insights for Improving Performance

    George P. Huber;William H. Glick

Frequent Co-Authors

William H. Glick
William H. Glick Rice University
David H. Gustafson
David H. Gustafson University of Wisconsin–Madison
Kathleen M. Sutcliffe
Kathleen M. Sutcliffe Johns Hopkins University
Andrew H. Van de Ven
Andrew H. Van de Ven University of Minnesota
Lex Donaldson
Lex Donaldson University of New South Wales
Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa
Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa The University of Texas at Austin
Charles C. Snow
Charles C. Snow Pennsylvania State University
Arie Y. Lewin
Arie Y. Lewin Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore studying Business and Management in the USA, it's important to consider the variety of flexible online degrees that can enhance your career and open doors to new opportunities. Numerous online college programs now offer nationally accredited degrees, making quality education more accessible than ever.

For aspiring leaders, an online PhD in organizational leadership is a strong pathway into executive roles and high-level consulting. Those interested in industries such as building and engineering might look into a construction project management degree online to develop skills in overseeing large-scale projects.

The healthcare sector is also expanding rapidly, making an online health administration degree highly relevant for those seeking to lead in hospitals, clinics, or health-related businesses.

By choosing a related online degree that matches your interests, you can accelerate your career, gain specialized expertise, and remain competitive in a dynamic job market.

Best Scientists Citing George P. Huber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles