World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gerardine DeSanctis

Gerardine DeSanctis

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
48
Citations
20678
World Ranking
1079
National Ranking
475

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
20247
World Ranking
7360
National Ranking
3206

Gerardine DeSanctis publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerardine DeSanctis sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 108 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Gerardine DeSanctis D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerardine DeSanctis sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gerardine DeSanctis was affiliated with Duke University in the United States during their academic career. Their work contributed to the field of organizational behavior and information systems, although detailed records of specific publications or research topics are not provided in the available data.

The scientist's scholarly activities did not show any recent papers or frequent collaborations documented in the provided information. Similarly, there is no data indicating frequent publication venues or book publishers associated with their work.

There is no listed information regarding specific fields or subfields of study thoroughly covered by Gerardine DeSanctis, nor are there identified main topics central to their research portfolio in the present source data.

Available data does not include details related to co-authors, awards, or honors received during their career. Furthermore, no information was provided concerning the number or titles of their publications.

Gerardine DeSanctis is recorded as deceased, thus the account of their academic contributions and affiliation is described in the past tense.

Best Publications

  • Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory

    Gerardine DeSanctis;Marshall Scott Poole

  • A foundation for the study of group decision support systems

    Gerardine DeSanctis;R. Brent Gallupe

  • Understanding the use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration

    Marshall Poole;Gerardine Desanctis

  • Introduction to the Special Issue: Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations

    Gerardine Desanctis;Peter Monge

  • Electronic Communication and Changing Organizational Forms

    Janet Fulk;Gerardine DeSanctis

  • Using a GDSS to facilitate group consensus: some intended and unintended consequences

    Richard T. Watson;Gerardine DeSanctis;Marshall Scott Poole

  • Computer-based support for group problem-finding: an exprimental investigation

    R. Brent Gallupe;Gerardine DeSanctis;Gary W. Dickson

  • Group decision support systems: a new frontier

    Gerardine DeSanctis;Brent Gallupe

  • Group decision support systems: a new frontier

    Gerardine DeSanctis;Brent Gallupe

  • COMPUTER GRAPHICS AS DECISION AIDS: DIRECTIONS FOR RESEARCH*

    Gerardine DeSanctis

  • A study of influence in computer-mediated group decision making

    Ilze Zigurs;M. Scott Poole;Gerardine L. DeSanctis

  • Human resource information systems: a current assessment

    Gerardine DeSanctis

  • Understanding the effectiveness of computer graphics for decision support: a cumulative experimental approach

    Gary W. Dickson;Gerardine DeSanctis;D. J. McBride

  • Methodological issues in experimental IS research: experiences and recommendations

    Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa;Gary W. Dickson;Gerardine DeSanctis

  • Conflict management in a computer-supported meeting in a computer supported meeting environment

    Marshall Scott Poole;Michael Holmes;Gerardine Desanctis

  • Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations

    Gerardine DeSanctis;Peter Monge

  • Structuration Theory in Information Systems Research: Methods and Controversies

    Marshall Scott Poole;Gerardine DeSanctis

  • Coordination of information technology management: team-based structures and computer-based communication systems

    Gerardine DeSanctis;Brad M. Jackson

  • Providing Decisional Guidance for Multicriteria Decision Making in Groups

    Moez Limayem;Gerardine DeSanctis

  • Use of group decision support systems as an appropriation process

    M.S. Poole;G. DeSanctis

  • Attitudes toward telecommuting: implications for work-at-home programs

    Gerardine DeSanctis

  • Using a GDSS to Facilitate Group Consensus: some Intended and Unimtended Consequences.

    Richard G. Watson;Gerardine DeSanctis;Marshall Scott Poole

Frequent Co-Authors

Marshall Scott Poole
Marshall Scott Poole University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Børge Obel
Børge Obel Aarhus University
Richard M. Burton
Richard M. Burton Duke University
Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa
Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa The University of Texas at Austin
R. Brent Gallupe
R. Brent Gallupe University of Auckland
Jeffrey T. Glass
Jeffrey T. Glass Duke University
Vallabh Sambamurthy
Vallabh Sambamurthy University of Wisconsin–Madison
Blake Ives
Blake Ives College of Charleston
John Leslie King
John Leslie King University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Janet Fulk
Janet Fulk University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in studying Business and Management in the USA, there are multiple online pathways to accelerate your career. Many students choose accelerated program options, which allow them to earn their qualifications faster and enter the workforce sooner. These programs are ideal for motivated individuals who want to maximize their time and investment.

For flexibility and cost-effectiveness, online business management degree programs are a popular choice. These programs let you balance your studies with work or family commitments, and often feature affordable tuition options for budget-conscious learners.

The field of healthcare offers additional opportunities with specialized degrees. Those interested in leadership within healthcare may consider a health administration degree to gain the skills needed to manage medical facilities or healthcare organizations. For advanced roles, a masters in healthcare management can open doors to senior positions and greater responsibilities.

Exploring these online degree pathways gives you the flexibility, speed, and expertise required to thrive in today’s fast-evolving business and healthcare environments.

Best Scientists Citing Gerardine DeSanctis

Recently Published Articles