World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard M. Burton

Richard M. Burton

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
40
Citations
8645
World Ranking
5271
National Ranking
2491

Richard M. Burton publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Burton sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 154 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Richard M. Burton D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Burton sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard M. Burton is affiliated with Duke University in the United States and has a substantial body of research primarily focused on organizational design and management science. Their work encompasses multiple fields including Business, Management and Accounting, Decision Sciences, and Social Sciences, with a particular concentration on strategy, management, and innovation.

Their research topics cover a range of areas such as:

  • Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Complex Systems and Decision Making
  • Business Strategy and Innovation
  • Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Quality and Supply Management
  • Auction Theory and Applications
  • Service and Product Innovation

Richard M. Burton has published extensively in several venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Journal of Organization Design
  • Social Science & Medicine
  • Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory
  • Cambridge University Press eBooks

Some of their recent notable papers include:

  • New trends in organization design (2020), Journal of Organization Design
  • Expanding the organizational design space: the emergence of AI robot bosses (2023), Journal of Organization Design
  • Fit, misfit, and design: JOD studies that touch reality (2020), Journal of Organization Design
  • Organizational resilience in emergency healthcare: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic in five Danish hospitals (2025), Social Science & Medicine
  • How firm boundaries and relatedness jointly affect diversification value: trade-offs between governance and flexibility (2020), Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory

In addition to journal articles, Burton has contributed to a book published by Cambridge University Press titled Organizational Design (2020), which has received citations and contributes to the academic discussion on organizational structures.

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Børge Obel
  • Dorthe Døjbak Håkonsson
  • Erik R. Larsen
  • Iben Duvald
  • C. Lohse

Their scholarly work is characterized by the integration of strategy and management with complex systems and decision-making theories, often analyzing how organizational structures can adapt or innovate in the context of evolving business environments and technological advances.

Best Publications

  • Research Design for Mixed Methods: A Triangulation-based Framework and Roadmap

    Scott F. Turner;Laura B. Cardinal;Richard M. Burton

  • Equity and the Technology Transfer Strategies of American Research Universities

    Maryann Feldman;Irwin Feller;Janet Bercovitz;Richard Burton

  • Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design : Developing Theory for Application

    Richard M. Burton;Børge Obel;Starling Hunter;Mikael Søndergaard

  • Organizational Structure as a Determinant of Academic Patent and Licensing Behavior: An Exploratory Study of Duke, Johns Hopkins, and Pennsylvania State Universities

    Janet Bercovitz;Maryann Feldman;Irwin Feller;Richard Burton

  • Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: The Dynamics of Fit

    Richard M. Burton;Børge Obel

  • Organizational Design : A Step-by-Step Approach

    Richard M. Burton;Børge Obel;Dorthe Døjbak Håkonsson

  • The impact of organizational climate and strategic fit on firm performance

    Richard M. Burton;Jørgen Lauridsen;Børge Obel;Børge Obel

  • A practical guide for making theory contributions in strategic management

    Richard Makadok;Richard M. Burton;Jay B. Barney

  • Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design

    Richard M. Burton;Børge Obel

  • Virtual Teams: What are their Characteristics, and Impact on Team Performance?

    Sze-Sze Wong;Richard M. Burton

  • The validity of computational models in organization science: from model realism to purpose of the model

    Richard M. Burton;Børge Obel

  • Return on Assets Loss from Situational and Contingency Misfits

    Richard M. Burton;Jørgen Lauridsen;Børge Obel

  • How failure to align organizational climate and leadership style affects performance

    Dorthe Døjbak Haakonsson;Richard M. Burton;Børge Obel;Jørgen Lauridsen

  • Organizations and Complexity: Searching for the Edge of Chaos

    Tim Carroll;Richard M. Burton

  • Computational Modeling for What-Is, What-Might-Be, and What-Should-Be Studies---And Triangulation

    Richard M. Burton;Børge Obel

  • Designing efficient organizations : modelling and experimentation

    Huseyin Leblebici;Richard M. Burton;Borge Obel

  • The science of organizational design: Fit between structure and coordination

    Richard M. Burton;Børge Obel

  • Organizational consultant: creating a usable theory for organizational design

    Helmy H. Baligh;Richard M. Burton;Børge Obel

  • Computational Laboratories for Organization Science: Questions, Validity and Docking

    Richard M. Burton

  • A Computer Simulation Test of the M-Form Hypothesis

    Richard M. Burton;Borge Obel

  • Exploration versus exploitation: Emotions and performance as antecedents and consequences of team decisions

    Dorthe Døjbak Håkonsson;Jacob Kjær Eskildsen;Linda Argote;Dan Mønster

Frequent Co-Authors

Børge Obel
Børge Obel Aarhus University
Gerardine DeSanctis
Gerardine DeSanctis Duke University
Will Mitchell
Will Mitchell University of Toronto
Maryann P. Feldman
Maryann P. Feldman Arizona State University
Charles C. Snow
Charles C. Snow Pennsylvania State University
Richard A. Bettis
Richard A. Bettis University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Linda Argote
Linda Argote Carnegie Mellon University
Jay B. Barney
Jay B. Barney University of Utah
Sim B. Sitkin
Sim B. Sitkin Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Social Sciences and Humanities can open doors to diverse careers. Many universities now offer 1 year master's programs online for those seeking an accelerated route to specialized positions, like policy analysis or nonprofit management.

For undergraduates, choosing an accelerated bachelor's degree online accredited allows students to graduate faster and start their professional journey sooner. These programs are ideal for motivated learners eager to switch careers or advance quickly.

Specialized pathways like social work and behavioral analysis are also popular. Students interested in making a difference in their communities can pursue flexible and affordable msw programs online, leading to advanced social work roles.

Those fascinated by behavior analysis can consider bcba masters programs online, designed to prepare graduates for Board Certified Behavior Analyst certification. These programs are crucial for professionals aiming to impact education, healthcare, and community organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Richard M. Burton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles