World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
98
Citations
35491
World Ranking
8916
National Ranking
4588

Frank J. Veith publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank J. Veith sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 842 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Frank J. Veith D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank J. Veith sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank J. Veith is affiliated with Yeshiva University in the United States. Their research has been primarily concentrated in the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Epidemiology, and Internal Medicine.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Vascular Procedures and Complications

Regarding publication venues, Frank J. Veith has frequently contributed to:

  • Journal of Vascular Surgery
  • Annals of Vascular Surgery
  • European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
  • Angiology
  • Vascular

Some of the recent published papers include:

  • "Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression Analysis of Outcomes of Endovascular and Open Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm" (2020, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery)
  • "Long-term chimney/snorkel endovascular aortic aneurysm repair experience for complex abdominal aortic pathologies within the PERICLES registry" (2020, Journal of Vascular Surgery)
  • "Benefits and drawbacks of statins and non-statin lipid lowering agents in carotid artery disease" (2022, Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases)
  • "Cholesterol, carotid artery disease and stroke: what the vascular specialist needs to know" (2020, Annals of Translational Medicine)
  • "Contemporary outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients deemed unfit for open surgical repair" (2020, Journal of Vascular Surgery)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Frank J. Veith include:

  • Karan Garg
  • Caron Rockman
  • Glenn R. Jacobowitz
  • Heepeel Chang
  • Neal S. Cayne

Best Publications

  • Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

    Elliot L Chaikof;Jan D. Blankensteijn;Peter L Harris;Geoffrey H White

  • Six-year prospective multicenter randomized comparison of autologous saphenous vein and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in infrainguinal arterial reconstructions.

    Frank J. Veith;Sushil K. Gupta;Enrico Ascer;Sheila White-Flores

  • The care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines

    Elliot L. Chaikof;David C. Brewster;Ronald L. Dalman;Michel S. Makaroun

  • A comparison of recombinant urokinase with vascular surgery as initial treatment for acute arterial occlusion of the legs. Thrombolysis or Peripheral Arterial Surgery (TOPAS) Investigators.

    Kenneth Ouriel;Frank J. Veith;Arthur A. Sasahara

  • Nature and significance of endoleaks and endotension: Summary of opinions expressed at an international conference

    Frank J. Veith;Richard A. Baum;Richard A. Baum;Takao Ohki;Takao Ohki;Max Amor;Max Amor

  • Identifying and grading factors that modify the outcome of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

    Elliot L. Chaikof;Mark F. Fillinger;Jon S. Matsumura;Robert B. Rutherford

  • Initial experience with transluminally placed endovascular grafts for the treatment of complex vascular lesions.

    Marin Ml;Veith Fj;Cynamon J;Sanchez La

  • SVS practice guidelines for the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: Executive summary

    Elliot L. Chaikof;David C. Brewster;Ronald L. Dalman;Michel S. Makaroun

  • Transluminally placed endovascular stented graft repair for arterial trauma

    Michael L. Marin;Frank J. Veith;Thomas F. Panetta;Jacob Cynamon

  • Increasing Incidence of Midterm and Long-term Complications After Endovascular Graft Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Note of Caution Based on a 9-year Experience

    Takao Ohki;Frank J. Veith;Palma Shaw;Evan Lipsitz

  • Collected world experience about the performance of the snorkel/chimney endovascular technique in the treatment of complex aortic pathologies: the PERICLES registry.

    Konstantinos P Donas;Jason T Lee;Mario L Lachat;Giovanni Torsello

  • Thrombolysis or peripheral arterial surgery: Phase I results

    Kenneth Ouriel;Frank J. Veith;Arthur A. Sasahara

  • Ex vivo human carotid artery bifurcation stenting: Correlation of lesion characteristics with embolic potential

    Takao Ohki;Michael L. Marin;Ross T. Lyon;George L. Berdejo

  • Unilateral and bilateral hypogastric artery interruption during aortoiliac aneurysm repair in 154 patients: a relatively innocuous procedure.

    Manish Mehta;Frank J. Veith;Takao Ohki;Jacob Cynamon

  • Transfemoral endoluminal stented graft repair of a popliteal artery aneurysm

    Michael L. Marin;Frank J. Veith;Thomas F. Panetta;Jacob Cynamon

  • Changing arteriosclerotic disease patterns and management strategies in lower-limb-threatening ischemia.

    Frank J. Veith;Sushil K. Gupta;Kurt R. Wengerter;Jamie Goldsmith

  • Current status of carotid bifurcation angioplasty and stenting based on a consensus of opinion leaders

    Frank J. Veith;Max Amor;Takao Ohki;Hugh G. Beebe

  • Efficacy of a filter device in the prevention of embolic events during carotid angioplasty and stenting: An ex vivo analysis.

    Takao Ohki;Gary S. Roubin;Frank J. Veith;Sriram S. Iyer

  • Collected world and single center experience with endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

    Frank J. Veith;Frank J. Veith;Mario Lachat;Dieter Mayer;Martin Malina

  • Progress in limb salvage by reconstructive arterial surgery combined with new or improved adjunctive procedures.

    Frank J. Veith;Sushil K. Gupta;Russell H. Samson;Larry A. Scher

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur J. Matas
Arthur J. Matas University of Minnesota
David W. Chang
David W. Chang University of Chicago
Gary S. Roubin
Gary S. Roubin University of Alabama at Birmingham
Michel S. Makaroun
Michel S. Makaroun University of Pittsburgh
Stanley S. Siegelman
Stanley S. Siegelman Johns Hopkins University
Christopher K. Zarins
Christopher K. Zarins Stanford University
Geoffrey D. Rubin
Geoffrey D. Rubin University of Arizona
Dimitri P. Mikhailidis
Dimitri P. Mikhailidis University College London
Anthony D. Whittemore
Anthony D. Whittemore Brigham and Women's Hospital
William H. Pearce
William H. Pearce Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in exploring other healthcare career options beyond traditional medical degrees? There are many flexible online programs tailored to healthcare professionals in the USA.

For nurses, the fastest psych np program options can help you quickly advance in specialized mental health roles. These programs allow working professionals to balance their education with career commitments.

Administrative roles are also in high demand. Earning an affordable healthcare administration degree online can prepare you for leadership in hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations.

If you're looking to further specialize, check out programs that focus on cost efficiency, such as a masters in healthcare administration cost comparison guide and the cheapest dnp online programs for those aiming for the highest levels of nursing practice and leadership.

Exploring these online degrees can open a wide range of rewarding healthcare career pathways, often at a lower cost and with greater flexibility than traditional on-campus programs.

Best Scientists Citing Frank J. Veith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles