World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Erling Seeberg

Erling Seeberg

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 56 2193 8 97 14282

Erling Seeberg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Erling Seeberg between 1973 and 2016, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Erling Seeberg published across 44 years, from 1973 to 2016, averaging 2.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2003. 1 of the 101 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2016. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2003. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 2 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication
1973 2016

101 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Erling Seeberg: publications per year, 1973 to 2016
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 0
1975 1
1976 2
1977 0
1978 2
1979 0
1980 2
1981 5
1982 3
1983 1
1984 2
1985 1
1986 2
1987 2
1988 0
1989 0
1990 2
1991 0
1992 4
1993 3
1994 3
1995 4
1996 5
1997 3
1998 4
1999 2
2000 3
2001 8
2002 6
2003 12
2004 8
2005 7
2006 2
2007 0
2008 0
2009 0
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 1
Total 101
Download as CSV

Erling Seeberg publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erling Seeberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 97–106 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 97 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131 97
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Erling Seeberg D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erling Seeberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113 56
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Overview

Erling Seeberg was affiliated with the University of Oslo in Norway during their academic career. They contributed to scientific research primarily through their association with this institution.

Throughout their career, Erling Seeberg was recognized as a Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO), an acknowledgment reflecting their involvement in the molecular biology research community.

As no listed recent papers or specific topics of research were provided, details about their exact scientific focus remain limited. Additionally, no coauthors, publication venues, book publications, or detailed fields and subfields of study were documented in the available data.

Best Publications

  • Cloning and expression of a rat brain L-glutamate transporter.

    Gilia Pines;Niels C. Danbolt;Magnar Bjørås;Magnar Bjørås;Yumin Zhang

  • ACCUMULATION OF PREMUTAGENIC DNA LESIONS IN MICE DEFECTIVE IN REMOVAL OF OXIDATIVE BASE DAMAGE

    Arne Klungland;Ian Rosewell;Stephan Hollenbach;Elisabeth Larsen

  • Human and bacterial oxidative demethylases repair alkylation damage in both RNA and DNA

    Per Arne Aas;Marit Otterlei;Pål Ø. Falnes;Cathrine B. Vågbø

  • AlkB-mediated oxidative demethylation reverses DNA damage in Escherichia coli

    Pål Ø. Falnes;Rune F. Johansen;Erling Seeberg

  • The base excision repair pathway.

    Erling Seeberg;Erling Seeberg;Lars Eide;Magnar Bjørås

  • Mutagenicity, toxicity and repair of DNA base damage induced by oxidation.

    Svein Bjelland;Erling Seeberg

  • Mutant huntingtin impairs axonal trafficking in mammalian neurons in vivo and in vitro.

    Eugenia Trushina;Roy B. Dyer;John D. Badger;Daren Ure

  • Repair of 8-Oxodeoxyguanosine Lesions in Mitochondrial DNA Depends on the Oxoguanine DNA Glycosylase (OGG1) Gene and 8-Oxoguanine Accumulates in the Mitochondrial DNA of OGG1-defective Mice

    Nadja C. de Souza-Pinto;Lars Eide;Barbara A. Hogue;Tanja Thybo

  • Opposite base‐dependent reactions of a human base excision repair enzyme on DNA containing 7,8‐dihydro‐8‐oxoguanine and abasic sites

    Magnar Bjørås;Luisa Luna;Barbro Johnsen;Elsebeth Hoff

  • Adaptation to alkylation resistance involves the induction of a DNA glycosylase.

    Grethe Evensen;Erling Seeberg

  • Six-fold speed-up of Smith-Waterman sequence database searches using parallel processing on common microprocessors

    Torbjørn Rognes;Erling Seeberg

  • Human DNA glycosylases of the bacterial Fpg/MutM superfamily: an alternative pathway for the repair of 8‐oxoguanine and other oxidation products in DNA

    Ingrid Morland;Veslemøy Rolseth;Luisa Luna;Torbjørn Rognes

  • Release of normal bases from intact DNA by a native DNA repair enzyme

    Knut G. Berdal;Rune F. Johansen;Erling Seeberg

  • AlkB restores the biological function of mRNA and tRNA inactivated by chemical methylation.

    Rune Ougland;Chun-Mei Zhang;Aivar Liiv;Rune F. Johansen

  • Differential Expression of Two Glial Glutamate Transporters in the Rat Brain: an In Situ Hybridization Study

    R. Torp;N. C. Danbolt;E. Babaie;M. BjØrås

  • The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Homologues of Endonuclease III from Escherichia coli, Ntg1 and Ntg2, Are Both Required for Efficient Repair of Spontaneous and Induced Oxidative DNA Damage in Yeast

    Ingrun Alseth;Lars Eide;Manuela Pirovano;Torbjørn Rognes

  • Base excision of oxidative purine and pyrimidine DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a DNA glycosylase with sequence similarity to endonuclease III from Escherichia coli

    L Eide;M Bjørås;M Pirovano;I Alseth

  • Escherichia coli mutants deficient in 3-methyladenine-DNA glycosylase.

    Peter Karran;Tomas Lindahl;Ingrid Øfsteng;Grethe B. Evensen

  • Proliferation failure and gamma radiation sensitivity of Fen1 null mutant mice at the blastocyst stage.

    Elisabeth Larsen;Christine Gran;Barbro Elisabet Sæther;Erling Seeberg

  • Incision of ultraviolet-irradiated DNA by extracts of E. coli requires three different gene products.

    Erling Seeberg;Jon Nissen-Meyer;Peter Strike;Peter Strike

Frequent Co-Authors

Magnar Bjørås
Magnar Bjørås Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Arne Klungland
Arne Klungland Oslo University Hospital
Niels C. Danbolt
Niels C. Danbolt University of Oslo
Jon Storm-Mathisen
Jon Storm-Mathisen University of Oslo
Jørn A. Holme
Jørn A. Holme Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Gunnar Brunborg
Gunnar Brunborg Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Baruch I. Kanner
Baruch I. Kanner Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Tomas Lindahl
Tomas Lindahl The Francis Crick Institute
Miroslav Radman
Miroslav Radman Université Paris Cité
Alan R. Lehmann
Alan R. Lehmann University of Sussex

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Molecular Biology can unlock diverse doors for your future, both in and beyond the lab. Many related fields offer flexible online study options, making it easier to expand your career possibilities or pivot to new roles. If you are interested in understanding the education required to be a speech pathologist, foundational knowledge from molecular biology can be a useful asset, especially when exploring speech and language disorders.

Other online degrees can complement your science background or develop new skills. Explore online architecture degree programs if you wish to apply scientific principles to design or engineering. For students drawn to data-heavy research or biostatistics, earning a degree from the online mathematics degrees can be a strong next step.

If you are passionate about scientific communication, the best online graphic design programs can help you create compelling visuals for publications or educational content. By considering these related degrees and career pathways, you can build a multidisciplinary skill set that aligns with your interests and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Erling Seeberg

Recently Published Articles